IRS approves museum-project set-aside

Plain-English summary

A private foundation planned to establish a museum for artwork expected from an individual's estate. It had purchased a building for the museum, but pandemic conditions halted renovation planning, prevented the search for a new location, and delayed public museum activity while the estate administration remained unfinished. The foundation requested to reserve part of the estimated project cost and represented that it would not need further set-asides. The IRS concluded that the specific project could be better accomplished through a set-aside than immediate payment and approved it under Section 4942(g)(2). The reserved amount must be paid for the project within 60 months after the first set-aside.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the private foundation treat funds reserved for the delayed museum project as a qualifying distribution?
• Outcome: Approved, with payment required within 60 months.
• Key authorities: IRC § 4942(g)(2); Treas. Reg. § 53.4942(a)-3(b); Rev. Rul. 74-450

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Number: 202118024 Employer Identification Number:
Release Date: sn,2021
Contact Person - ID Number:
Date: February 10, 2021
Contact Telephone Number:

LEGEND UIL
4942.03-07
W = Year
X = Individual
y dollars = Amount
z dollars = Amount

Dear

Why you are receiving this letter
This is our response to your May 29, 2020 letter requesting approval of a set-aside
under Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2). You've been recognized as tax­
exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code and have been determined to be a
private foundation under Section 509(a).

Our determination
Based on the information furnished, your set-aside program is approved under
Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2). As required under Section 4942(g)(2),
the set aside amount must be paid within the 60-month period after the date of the
first set-aside.

Description of set-aside request
You plan to establish a museum for . You purchased
a building that was intended to be converted into an art museum once you take
ownership of certain artwork that resides in the estate of X. The artwork is
expected to be distributed prior to the end of W. Due to the recent COVID-19
pandemic your plans for renovating the building have been placed on hold. Your
leadership is re-evaluating your plans to remodel the building and are not in a
position to operate a museum at this time. You are requesting a set aside in the
amount of y dollars. The project is estimated to cost z dollars. The existing building
is no longer expected to be used for the museum and you are unable to scout new
locations due to the pandemic. You do not believe you will require any additional
funding or set-asides to complete the project.
There are several reasons why the project is better accomplished through the set-
aside rather than immediate payment. The estate of X holds various pieces of
artwork that will be distributed once administration is completed . In addition , the
COVID-19 pandemic has placed a hold on the public visiting of museums which
will continue in the foreseeable future . Finally, while your leadership develops new
plans the artwork

You have attested that the amount of the set-aside will actually be paid for the
specific project within a specified period of time that ends not more than 60
months after the date of the first set-aside.

Basis for our determination
Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2)(A) states that an amount set aside for
a specific project, which includes one or more purposes described in Section
170(c)(2)(B), may be treated as a qualifying distribution if it meets the
requirements of Section 4942(g)(2)(B) .

Section 4942(g)(2)(B) of the Code states that an amount set aside for a specific
project will meet the requirements of this subparagraph if, at the time of the set-
aside, the foundation establishes that the amount will be paid within five years and
either clause (i) or (ii) are satisfied .

Section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) of the Code is satisfied if, at the time of the set-aside, the
private foundation establishes that the project can better be accomplished using
the set-aside than by making an immediate payment.

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) of the Foundations and Similar Excise Taxes
Regulations provides that a private foundation may establish a project as better
accomplished by a set-aside than by immediate payment if the set-aside satisfies
the suitability test described in Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) .

Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) of the Foundations and Similar Excise Taxes
Regulations provides that specific projects better accomplished using a set-aside
include, but are not limited to, projects where relatively long-term expenditures
must be made requiring more than one year's income to assure their continuity.

In Revenue Ruling 74-450, 1974-2 C.B. 388, an operating foundation converted a
portion of newly acquired land into a public park under a four-year construction
contract. The construction contract payments were to be made mainly during the
final two years . This constituted a "specific project. " The foundation 's set-aside of
all its excess earnings for four years was treated as a qualifying distribution under
Internal Revenue Code Section 4942(g)(2) .

What you must do
Your approved set-aside(s) will be documented on your records as pledges or
obligations to be paid by the date specified . The amounts set aside will be taken
into account to determine your minimum investment return under Internal Revenue
Code Section 4942(e)(1 )(A) , and the income attributable to your set aside(s) will
also be taken into account in computing your adjusted net income under Section
4942(f) of the Code.

Additional information
This determination is directed only to the organization that requested it. Internal
Revenue Code Section 611 0(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as a
precedent.

Please keep a copy of this letter in your records.

If you have any questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this
letter.

                                      Sincerely,




                                      Stephen A. Martin
                                      Director, Exempt Organizations
                                      Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure