Additional nondisclosure language accepted
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This brief Chief Counsel email reviews additional language for a nondisclosure agreement. The writer states that the language looked good and planned to contact a redacted party again. The writer also noted uncertainty about how extensively that party reviewed agreements of this kind. The public release contains no agreement text or further legal analysis.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was the additional nondisclosure-agreement language acceptable?
- Outcome: Advice given: yes.
- Key authorities: UILC 6103.14-00, disclosure to contractors
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2020021313435143
UILC: 6103.14-00
Number: 202118011
Release Date: 5/7/2021
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:43:51 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: NDA
The additional language looks good to me. I will reach out again to -----------------------. I
really don’t know to what extent they review these types of agreements.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace