Additional nondisclosure language accepted
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This brief Chief Counsel email reviews additional language for a nondisclosure agreement. The writer states that the language looked good and planned to contact a redacted party again. The writer also noted uncertainty about how extensively that party reviewed agreements of this kind. The public release contains no agreement text or further legal analysis.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Was the additional nondisclosure-agreement language acceptable?
- Outcome: Advice given: yes.
- Key authorities: UILC 6103.14-00, disclosure to contractors
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2020021313435143
UILC: 6103.14-00
Number: 202118011
Release Date: 5/7/2021
From:
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2020 1:43:51 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: NDA
The additional language looks good to me. I will reach out again to -----------------------. I
really don’t know to what extent they review these types of agreements.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.