Private Letter Ruling 202115004 Released April 16, 2021 Approved

Taxpayers may restore installment reporting after preparer's mistake

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A business owner sold the business for an installment note and expected the gain to be reported under the installment method. A new accountant instead reported the entire gain in the sale year, inadvertently electing out of installment reporting. After an attempted amended return and an IRS examination, the taxpayers requested consent to revoke that election. The IRS granted the request because the election was inadvertent, the sale year remained open, and the taxpayers neither relied on hindsight nor sought to avoid federal tax.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayers revoke their election out of the installment method and report the business-sale gain over time?
  • Outcome: Approved. The taxpayers may revoke the election and use installment reporting.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 453(a), (d); Treas. Reg. § 15a.453-1(d)(4)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202115004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/16/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 453.08-00
Person To Contact:

------------------------------------ -----------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:


---------------------------------------- --------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:5
PLR-116231-20
Date: January 19, 2021

Taxpayers A&B = ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taxpayer A = -------------------
Buyer = --------------------------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------
Year = -------
$w = ------------
Months = ----------------
Interest Rate = ----
Payment = -------------
Accountant = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ----------------------------------------------:

This letter refers to the Taxpayers A&B’s request for a private letter ruling for permission
to revoke their election out of the installment method for the sale of certain properties
under § 453 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 15a.453-1(d)(4) of the Income
Tax Regulations (Regulations).

On Date 1, Taxpayer A sold all assets in his business to Buyer. Buyer assumed all
business liabilities and signed a promissory note in the amount of $w. The promissory
note obligated Buyer to make Payment at Interest Rate over a period of Months.
Taxpayers A&B’s preparer who regularly prepared and filed their annual Federal
Income Tax returns became sick, and on Date 2, Taxpayer A met with new Accountant
for the first time. Taxpayer A provided Accountant with the information necessary to
prepare Taxpayers A&B’s federal income tax return for Year with an expectation that
the installment method for the sale of business will be used. Inadvertently, Accountant
did not report the gain from the sales on the installment method under § 453 of the
Code, but instead reported the entire amount as gain on Taxpayers A&B’s Year Federal
PLR-116231-20 2

Income Tax return. Accountant attempted to correct the mistake by filing an amended
Federal Income Tax Return for Year. The Internal Revenue Service examined
Taxpayers A&B’s original Federal Income Tax Return and the amended Federal Income
Tax Return for Year and completed the exam on Date 3. As soon as the exam was
completed and Taxpayers A&B became aware of the appropriate procedure for
requesting a revocation of the election, they requested this ruling.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 453(a) of the Code provides that income from an installment sale shall be taken
into account under the installment method. Section 453(d)(1) provides that § 453(a)
shall not apply to any sale if the taxpayer elects not to have § 453(a) apply to the sale.

Section 453(d)(2) of the Code provides that, except as otherwise provided by
regulations, an election under § 453(d)(1) with respect to a sale may be made only on or
before the due date prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing the taxpayer's
return for the taxable year in which the sale occurs. Such an election shall be made in
the manner prescribed by the regulations.

Section 453(d)(3) of the Code provides that an election under § 453(d)(1) with respect
to any sale may be revoked only with consent of the Secretary.

Section 15a.453-1(d)(4) of the Regulations states that an election out of the installment
method may be revoked only with consent of the Internal Revenue Service. A
revocation will not be permitted when one of its purposes is the avoidance of federal
taxes, or when the taxable year in which any payment was received is closed.

In this case, the information submitted indicates that Taxpayers inadvertently elected
out of the installment method. Additionally, Taxpayers did not use hindsight in
requesting relief, and this request is not motivated by an intent to avoid federal taxes.
Further, the Taxpayers’ taxable year in which the sale took place is not closed.
Accordingly, based on the information submitted, Taxpayers may revoke their election
out of the installment method of reporting under § 453(d)(3) of the Code, and report the
gain on the sale of business using the installment method.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
PLR-116231-20 3

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                             Sincerely,



                                             Erika C. Reigle
                                             Assistant to the Branch Chief, Branch 5
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax & Accounting)

cc: ----------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.