Pension minimum-funding waiver approved with strict conditions

Plain-English summary

An employer in Chapter 11 sought relief from its pension plan's remaining minimum required contribution. Heavy debt-service costs had caused temporary substantial business hardship, but reduced debt, cost cuts, and planned investment supported projections that future funding obligations could be met. The IRS approved the waiver subject to six conditions, including acceptable collateral, specified contributions, timely quarterly payments, benefit-increase restrictions, later-year funding, and prompt proof of payment to the IRS and PBGC. Failure to satisfy any condition makes the waiver retroactively null and void.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Does the employer's temporary substantial business hardship justify a pension minimum-funding waiver?
• Outcome: Approved, subject to six continuing conditions.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 412(c) and 430(j); ERISA § 302

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202114004 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/9/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 412.06-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------- ----------------------,ID No.------------------
--------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------- Refer Reply To:
-------------------------- CC:EEE:EB:QP2
PLR-115183-20
In Re: ---------------------------------------------------- Date:
------------------------------------------------------------ January 05, 2021

Taxpayer = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan = ------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear -------------:

This letter constitutes notice that the waiver of the minimum funding standard for the
Plan for the plan year ending December 31, ------- (Plan Year) is approved subject to the
conditions listed below. This waiver is for the remaining unpaid minimum required
contribution for the Plan Year; all waiver amortization payments attributable to this
waiver and all outstanding waivers must be paid as stated in § 412(c)(1)(C) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

This waiver is contingent on Taxpayer’s satisfaction of all of the following conditions,
and the failure to satisfy any of these conditions renders this waiver retroactively null
and void as of the date the waiver is granted.

1. Collateral acceptable to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is
   provided to Plan for the full amount of the minimum funding waiver for the -------
   plan year within 120 days from the date of the IRS ruling letter granting the
   waiver;

2. Pursuant to section ------------------------------------------------------------------, Taxpayer
   will make a timely contribution to the Plan in an amount sufficient to meet the
   minimum funding requirement for the Plan for the plan year ending December 31,
   -------;

3. Starting with the quarterly contribution due on April 15, -------, Taxpayer will make

PLR-115183-20 2

  timely contributions equal to the required quarterly contributions to the Plan while
  a waiver under § 412(c) of the Code is in effect with respect to Plan. For this
  purpose, the total amount of each quarterly contribution will be determined in
  accordance with § 430(j)(3)(D) and, whenever applicable, sections 430(j)(3)(E)
  and 430(j)(4);

4. Under § 412(c)(7), Taxpayer is restricted from amending Plan to increase
  benefits and/or Plan liabilities while a waiver under § 412(c) is in effect with
  respect to the Plan, except to any extent otherwise permitted under
  § 412(c)(7)(B), in which case Taxpayer must copy PBGC on any correspondence
  with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) regarding notification of or application for
  such an exception;

5. Taxpayer makes timely contributions to Plan in an amount sufficient to meet the
  minimum funding requirements for Plan for the plan years ending December 31, -
  -------, through December 31, -------, by September 15, ------- through September
  15, -------, respectively;

6. Taxpayer provides proof of payment of all contributions described above to IRS
  and PBGC within (5) business days of each payment thereof, using the following
  fax numbers or addresses:

  ------------------------------
  -------------------------
  ------------------------------------------
  ----------------------------
  -------------------------

  ---------------------------------------------------
  ----------------------------------------------
  ---------------------------
  -------------------------------
  -------------------------
  ------------------------------------------------

This waiver is granted in accordance with § 412(c) of the Code and § 302 of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

Section 412(c)(1) of the Code provides generally that if an employer is unable to satisfy
the minimum funding standard for a plan year without temporary substantial business
hardship and application of the standard would be adverse to the interests of plan
participants in the aggregate, the minimum funding standard requirements may be
waived for the year with respect to all or any portion of the minimum funding standard.
PLR-115183-20 3

Section 412(c)(2) provides that the factors taken into account in determining a
temporary substantial business hardship include whether the employer is operating at
an economic loss, whether there is substantial unemployment or underemployment in
the trade or business and in the industry concerned, whether the sales and profits of the
industry concerned are depressed or declining, and whether it is reasonable to expect
that the plan will be continued only if the waiver is granted.

Taxpayer has been suffering from a temporary substantial business hardship due in part
to the cost of servicing its heavy debt obligations, and Taxpayer recently filed for a
reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. It appears likely that the
Taxpayer will emerge from the reorganization with a substantially reduced debt load.
Taxpayer has also provided detailed plans to cut costs and substantially invest in the
business in order to improve future prospects. As a result of these actions to facilitate
its long-term improvement, Taxpayer’s financial projections illustrate that its cash flows
will improve adequately to satisfy the Plan’s funding obligation in the near future.

Based on the facts as represented by Taxpayer, the legal standard for a “temporary
substantial business hardship” pursuant to § 412(c) has been met.

Section 412(c)(7) of the Code and § 302(c)(7) of ERISA describe the consequences
that result in the event the Plan is amended to increase benefits, change the accrual of
benefits, or change the rate of vesting, while any portion of the waived funding
deficiency remains unamortized. Any amendment to a profit sharing plan or any other
retirement plan (covering employees covered by Plan) maintained by Taxpayer, to
increase (or any action by Taxpayer or its authorized agents or designees, such as a
Board of Directors or Board of Trustees, that has the effect of increasing) the liabilities
of the plan is considered an amendment for purposes of § 412(c) of the Code and
§ 302(c)(7) of ERISA. Similarly, the establishment of a new profit-sharing plan or any
other retirement plan by Taxpayer (covering employees covered by the Plan) is
considered an amendment for purposes of § 412(c)(7) of the Code and § 302(c)(7) of
ERISA.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2021-1, § 7.01(16)(b). This office has
not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for ruling, and such
material is subject to verification on examination. The Associate office will revoke or
modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation retroactively if there has been a
misstatement or omission of controlling facts; the facts at the time of the transaction are
materially different from the controlling facts on which the ruling was based; or, in the
case of a transaction involving a continuing action or series of actions, the controlling
facts change during the course of the transaction. See Rev. Proc. 2021-1, § 11.05.
PLR-115183-20 4

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences or other consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item
discussed or referenced in this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                   Sincerely,




                                   Janet Laufer
                                   Senior Technician Reviewer
                                   Qualified Plans Branch 3
                                   Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations, and
                                   Employment Taxes)

cc: