Opportunity fund gets 45 days to make a late self-certification election
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2021, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A partnership formed to invest in qualified opportunity zone property intended to certify itself as a qualified opportunity fund for its first tax year. Its tax adviser knew Form 8996 was required but failed to attach the form to the partnership's timely filed return. The partnership promptly requested relief after discovering the omission and represented that the late election would not lower its tax liability. The IRS found that it acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 45 days from the ruling date to file an amended return with Form 8996, but did not decide whether the partnership or its investments otherwise satisfy the qualified opportunity fund rules.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the partnership receive an extension to make its qualified opportunity fund self-certification election?
- Outcome: Approved. It received 45 days to file an amended return with Form 8996.
- Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(a)-1, 1.1400Z2(d)-1, 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202103013 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 1/22/2021 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------- --------------------, ID No. ------------
------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- --------------------
--------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B05
------------------------------------------- PLR-117194-20
Date:
October 27, 2020
TY: -------
Legend
Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------
Tax Advisor = -------------------
State Z = -------------
Date 1 = ----------------
Affiliates = ---------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Date 2 = ---------------------
Firm = ----------------------------
Year 3 = -------
Dear -----------------:
This ruling responds to the taxpayer’s request dated ------------------. Specifically, the
taxpayer requests an extension of time under sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of
the Income Tax Regulations to (1) make a timely election under section 1.1400Z2(a)-
1(a)(2)(i) to be certified as a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), as defined in section
1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code); and (2) for the taxpayer to be treated
as a QOF, effective as of the month the taxpayer was formed in Year 2 as provided
under section 1400Z-2(d) of the Code and section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a) of the Income Tax
Regulations.
FACTS
The taxpayer was organized as a limited liability company under the laws of State Z in
Date 1 and is classified as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes. The
taxpayer was organized for the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone
property as defined in section 1400Z-2(d)(2). On or shortly after the date of the
taxpayer’s organization, members in the taxpayer made contributions of cash to the
capital of the taxpayer. Certain of those contributions were intended by the members to
be a qualifying investment, as defined in section 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(34).
Since Date 1, the principal owners of the taxpayer have been engaged in starting its
business, located within a qualified opportunity zone, which include obtaining permits
and licenses, and executing a lease for space. The principal owners of taxpayer are
also the principal owners of Affiliates.
Since Year 1, Tax Advisor, a qualified tax advisor, has prepared the Federal tax returns
for Affiliates. Tax Advisor timely filed the Year 2 tax returns of Affiliates on or before
Date 2. Further, Tax Advisor has, since Year 3, prepared the individual income tax
returns for the principal owners of the taxpayer. Tax Advisor timely filed the principals’
individual income tax returns timely for Year 2.
According to the affidavits and information provided to us, the taxpayer and the Tax
Advisor were aware of the requirement to file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund,
with the taxpayer’s timely filed Federal income tax return for Year 2 for the taxpayer to
elect to certify itself as a QOF. The taxpayer and the Tax Advisor were aware of the
taxpayer’s desire to be certified as a QOF for the entire tax year. However, according to
the information submitted, Tax Advisor failed to attach the Form 8996 to the taxpayer’s
timely filed return.
After becoming aware of the consequences of failing to timely file the Form 8996 after
Date 2, the taxpayer directed Firm to promptly to submit this request for relief under
sections 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3. Taxpayer represents that it relied on Tax Advisor
to timely file Form 8996. Taxpayer further represents that granting of the relief under
section 301.9100-3 will not result in a lower tax liability for Year 2.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code directs the Secretary to
prescribe regulations for rules for the certification of QOFs. Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)
of the Income Tax Regulations provides that the rules for an entity to self-certify as a
QOF. Section 1.1400Z2(a)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the entity electing to be certified as a
QOF must do so annually on a timely filed return in such form and manner as may be
prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service
forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.
To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996, Qualified Opportunity Fund,
with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be
filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). The information provided
indicates that the taxpayer did not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its income tax
return (including extensions) due to Tax Advisor’s failure to attach the form to the timely
filed return, even though Tax Advisor was aware of the need to attach Form 8996.
Because section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for an entity to
self-certify as a QOF, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in section
301.9100-1(b).
Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner
will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory
election. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for extensions of time for
regulatory elections (other than automatic extensions covered in section 301.9100-2)
will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence (including affidavits) to establish
that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and the grant of relief will not
prejudice the interests of the Government.
Under section 301.9100-3(b) a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in
good faith if the taxpayer requests relief before the failure to make the regulatory
election is discovered by the Service, or reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make,
the election. However, a taxpayer is not considered to have reasonably relied on a
qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have known that the
professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory election or was not
aware of all relevant facts.
In addition, section 301.9100-3(b)(3) provides that a taxpayer is deemed not to have
acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer—
(i) seeks to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has
been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time the taxpayer requests
relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for
which relief is requested;
(ii) was fully informed in all material respects of the required election and
related tax consequences but chose not to make the election; or
(iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief. If specific facts have changed since
the original deadline that make the election advantageous to a taxpayer,
the Service will not ordinarily grant relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that the Commissioner will grant a reasonable
extension of time to make the regulatory election only when the interests of the
Government will not be prejudiced by the granting of relief.
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the interests of the Government are prejudiced
if granting relief would result in a taxpayer having a lower tax liability in the aggregate
for all taxable years affected by the election than the taxpayer would have had if the
election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money).
Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the interests of the government are ordinarily
prejudiced if the taxable year in which the regulatory election should have been made or
any taxable year that would have been affected by the election had it been timely made
are closed by the period of limitations on assessment under § 6501(a) before the
taxpayer’s receipt of a ruling granting relief under this section.
Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that the taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting
of relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, based solely
on the facts and information submitted, and the representations made in the ruling
request, we grant the taxpayer an extension of 45 days from the date of this letter ruling
to file an amended return to make the election under section 1400Z-2 and section
1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i). The election is to be made on Form 8996.
This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling.
However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.
Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Specifically, we express no opinion, either express or implied, concerning
whether any investments made into the taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined
in section 1.1400Z2 (a)–1(b)(34) or whether the taxpayer meets the requirements under
section 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. We express no opinion
regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other
sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant
transaction.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
Sincerely,
Shareen S. Pflanz
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 5
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax & Accounting)
cc: ----------------------
----------------------------
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2021, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.