Seafood trade-relief payments can qualify for the tribal fishing-income exclusion

Number
202053014
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Federal Tax Treatment of Income Derived By Indians From Exercise of Fishing Rights Secured by Treaty, Etc.
Code sections
§ 7873
Ruling dated
November 27, 2020
Publicly released
December 31, 2020

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Members of a federally recognized Indian tribe received payments under the Department of Agriculture's Seafood Trade Relief Program after foreign retaliatory tariffs reduced seafood exports. IRC § 7873 excludes qualifying income that tribal members or qualified Indian entities derive from treaty-protected fishing activities. Counsel viewed the relief payments as substitutes for lost income from harvesting, processing, transporting, or selling the affected fish. The program was limited to commercial fishermen harmed on particular species, and payment amounts reflected expected trade damage for those species. Counsel concluded that if the replaced income qualified as fishing rights-related income, the substitute relief payments received by a tribal member or qualified Indian entity also qualified for the § 7873 exclusion.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May qualifying tribal fishermen exclude Seafood Trade Relief Program payments under § 7873?
  • Outcome: Advice given: yes, when the payments replace qualifying fishing rights-related income
  • Key authorities: IRC § 7873; S. Rep. No. 445, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 474 (1988); H. Rep. No. 312 (part 2), 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 7 (1988)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2020112709582040
UILC: 7873.00-00

Number: 202053014
Release Date: 12/31/2020
From: -----------------------
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2020 9:58:20 AM
To: ---------------------
Cc: ------------------------------------------------------------ Bcc: Subject: Assistance request on the application of sec 7873 to Seafood Trade Relief Program (POSTU- 123809-20)

Hi ----------,
You have asked for CC:EEE:EOET:ET’s assistance on whether members of a federally recognized Indian tribe who are excluding income from fishing rights-related activity under section 7873 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) may also exclude payments received under the Seafood Trade Relief Program (STRP). The STRP is administered by the United States Department of Agriculture and provides payments to eligible commercial fisherman of seafood commodities that have been impacted by trade actions of foreign governments resulting in the loss of exports (“retaliatory tariffs”).

Section 7873 of the Code provides rules governing the federal tax treatment of income derived by Indians from the exercise of fishing rights secured by treaty. The general rule of section 7873(a)(1) provides that no income tax shall be imposed on income derived by a member of an Indian tribe directly or through a qualified Indian entity, or by a qualified Indian entity, from a fishing rights-related activity of such tribe. The general rule of section 7873(a)(2) provides that no employment taxes shall be imposed on remuneration paid for services performed in a fishing rights-related activity of an Indian tribe by a member of such tribe for another member of such tribe or for a qualified Indian entity.

“Fishing rights-related activity” is defined by section 7873(b)(1), with respect to any Indian tribe, as any activity directly related to harvesting, processing, or transporting fish harvested in the exercise of a recognized fishing right of such tribe or to selling such fish, but only if substantially all of such harvesting was performed by members of the tribe.

“Recognized fishing rights” is defined by section 7873(b)(2), with respect to an Indian tribe, as fishing rights secured as of March 17, 1988, by a treaty between the tribe and the United States or by an Executive order or an Act of Congress.

“Qualified Indian entity” is defined by section 7873(b)(3)(A) to mean, with respect to an Indian tribe, any entity if (1) the entity is engaged in a fishing rights-related activity of the tribe, (2) all of the equity interests in the entity are owned by qualified Indian tribes,

members of such tribes, or their spouses, (3) except as provided in regulations, in the case of an entity that engages in any substantial processing or transporting of fish, 90 percent or more of the annual gross receipts of the entity is derived from fishing rights- related activities of one or more qualified Indian tribes each of which owns at least 10 percent of the equity interests in the entity, and (4) substantially all of the management functions of the entity are performed by members of qualified Indian tribes.

The legislative history of section 7873 provides additional guidance on the term “fishing rights-related activity.” Specifically, the Senate report states, “[t]he term “fishing rights- related activity” is defined to include any activity directly related to harvesting (including aquaculture), processing, or transporting fish harvested in the exercise of fishing rights guaranteed by treaty, Federal statute, or executive order, or the selling of such fish, provided that substantially all of the harvesting of such fish was performed by members of the tribe granted such fishing rights. S. Rep. No. 445, 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 474 (1988). The House report further provides, “[i]t is the intent of the Committee that this legislation be read broadly to clarify the tax exempt status of all fishing activities, regardless of whether they are protected by treaty, executive order, or statute. H. Rep. No. 312 (part 2), 100th Cong., 2d Sess. 7 (1988).

We believe the STRP payments received by the tribal fisherman are income derived from a fishing rights-related activity of the tribe, as described in section 7873(a). The STRP payments to commercial fisherman are intended to offset the loss of income from fish exports due to retaliatory tariffs imposed by foreign governments. The STRP payments are not available to anyone affected by retaliatory tariffs in general, they are offered only to commercial fisherman who have lost income on the export of particular fish, and the payments are calculated based on the expected trade damage for each affected species of fish. In effect, the payments are substitutes for income lost on the harvesting, processing, and transporting fish subject due to the tariffs. If the income being replaced by the STRP payments is “income derived from a fishing rights-related activity of the tribe,” then the STRP payments received by a tribal member or qualified Indian entity (as described in section 7873(b)(3)) will also meet the requirements for exclusion under section 7873.

Please let us know if you have any questions or would like to discuss.

-----------------------
--------------------------
-------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace