Private Letter Ruling 202020005 Released May 15, 2020 Approved

Late QSST elections do not end corporation's S status

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Shares of an S corporation were held through revocable grantor trusts established by two owners. After the owners died, one trust transferred shares to another trust and the other trust continued holding its shares, but the respective income beneficiaries failed to file timely qualified subchapter S trust elections. The first failure terminated the corporation's S election, and the second would have caused another termination had the election still been in effect. The IRS found both failures inadvertent under section 1362(f) and treated the corporation as continuously maintaining S status. Relief is void unless the beneficiaries file retroactive QSST elections within 120 days, and the IRS expressed no opinion on whether the trusts actually satisfy the QSST requirements.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the corporation retain S status after beneficiaries of two shareholder trusts failed to make timely QSST elections?
  • Outcome: approved as an inadvertent termination, conditioned on retroactive QSST elections within 120 days
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c)(2), 1361(d), and 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202020005 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/15/2020 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1361.00-00, 1361.03-00 Person To Contact:
----------------------------,
------------------------------------------------- ID No. -----------------
------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
-------------- --------------------
--------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-116738-19
Date:
January 13, 2020

LEGEND

X = --------------------------------------------------

State = -----------

A = ------------------------

B = ---------------------------

Trust 1 = --------------------------------------------------------

Trust 2 = ---------------------------------------------------

Trust 3 = ----------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = -------------------

Date 2 = ---------------------

Date 3 = --------------------

Date 4 = ----------------------

Date 5 = ----------------------

Date 6 = --------------------
PLR-116738-19 2

Date 7 = -------------------

Date 8 = --------------------------

Date 9 = --------------------------

Dear -------------------:

   This responds to a letter dated May 14, 2019, and subsequent information,

submitted on behalf of X by X's authorized representative, requesting relief under
section 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code.

FACTS

  According to the information submitted and representations within, X was

incorporated on Date 1, under the laws of State. Effective Date 2, X elected to be taxed
as an S corporation.

  On Date 3, A established Trust 1, a revocable trust treated as a wholly-owned

grantor trust under §§ 671 and 676. On Date 4, Trust 1 acquired shares in X.

    On Date 5, A died and Trust 1 ceased to be a grantor trust with respect to A' s

interest, but continued to qualify as an eligible S corporation shareholder under §
1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) for the 2 year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner's
death. On Date 6, by operation of the governing instrument of Trust 1, shares of X were
transferred to Trust 2. X represents that Trust 2 qualified to elect to be treated as
qualified subchapter S trusts (QSST). However, the sole income beneficiaries of the
separate shares of Trust 2 failed to make timely QSST elections within the meaning of §
1361(d)(2), thereby causing X's S corporation election to terminate on Date 6.

  On Date 7, B established Trust 3, a revocable trust treated as a wholly-owned

grantor trust under §§ 671 and 676. On Date 4, Trust 3 acquired shares in X.

   On Date 8, B died and Trust 3 ceased to be a grantor trust with respect to B' s

interest, but continued to qualify as an eligible S corporation shareholder under §
1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) for the 2 year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner's
death. X represents that Trust 3 qualified to elect to be treated as a QSST. However,
the sole income beneficiaries of the separate shares of Trust 3 failed to make timely
QSST elections within the meaning of § 1361(d)(2). The failure to make the QSST
elections would have terminated X's S corporation election on Date 9 had it not already
been terminated.

   X represents that the circumstances resulting in the failure to file the QSST

elections for Trust 2 and Trust 3 were inadvertent and not motivated by tax avoidance or
PLR-116738-19 3

retroactive tax planning. X further represents that X has filed its income tax returns
consistent with having a valid S election in effect for all taxable years since X elected to
be an S corporation. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments
(consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation) as may be required by the
Secretary.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to

any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.

   Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic

corporation which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more
than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a
trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not
an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1
class of stock.

   Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) provides that for purposes of § 1361(b)(1)(B), a trust all

of which is treated (under subpart E) as owned by an individual who is a citizen or
resident of the United States may be a shareholder of an S corporation.

   Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that a trust may be an S corporation

shareholder if it was described in section 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) immediately before the death
of the deemed owner and it continues in existence after such death, but only for the 2-
year period beginning on the day of the deemed owner's death.

    Section 1361(d)(1) provides that in the case of a QSST with respect to which a

beneficiary makes an election under § 1361(d)(2) the trust is treated as a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i) and, for purposes of § 678(a), the beneficiary of the trust
is treated as the owner of that portion of the trust which consists of stock in a S
corporation with respect to which the election under § 1361(d)(2) is made.

   Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a)

by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3) or § 1361(b)(3)(C); (2) the
Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in such termination were
inadvertent; (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the
circumstances resulting in such termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for
which the termination occurred is a small business corporation; and (4) the corporation
for which the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such
corporation at any time during the period specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to
make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of such corporation as an S
corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then,
PLR-116738-19 4

notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such termination, such corporation shall
be treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

   Based solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that

X's S corporation election terminated beginning on Date 6, when the stock in X was
transferred to Trust 2 because the income beneficiaries of Trust 2 failed to timely file the
required QSST elections under § 1361(d)(2). We conclude that the termination was
inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Moreover, had X's S corporation election
not already terminated on Date 6, it would have terminated on Date 9 as a result of the
income beneficiaries of Trust 3 failing to timely file the required QSST elections under §
1361(d)(2). Similarly, this would have been inadvertent termination within the meaning
of § 1362(f). Pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as continuing to
be an S corporation beginning on and after Date 6, unless X's S corporation election is
otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

    This letter ruling is subject to the condition that within 120 days from the date of

this letter, the income beneficiaries of Trust 2 must file a QSST election effective Date 6
and the income beneficiaries of Trust 3 must file a QSST election effective Date 9. All
elections must be filed with the appropriate service center. A copy of this letter should
be attached to the QSST elections. If this condition is not met, then this ruling is null
and void. Furthermore, if this condition is not met, X must send notification that its S
election has terminated to the service center with which X's S election was filed.

     Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion

concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other
provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X's
eligibility to be an S corporation. Further, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning
whether Trust 2 and Trust 3 meet the requirements of a QSST under § 1361(d)(3).

  The ruling contained in this letter is based on information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and is accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement
executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material
submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-116738-19 5

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to §

6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of

this letter to X's authorized representative.

                                         Sincerely,



                                         Laura C. Fields
                                         Laura C. Fields
                                         Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
                                         Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                         (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes

cc: ---------------------------
---------------------
--------------------------------------

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.