Private Letter Ruling 202019017 Released May 8, 2020 Approved

Late Form 8996 treated as timely for qualified opportunity fund status

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership was formed to operate as a qualified opportunity fund and hired an adviser to prepare its first federal return, request an automatic extension, and file Form 8996. The adviser knew the filing requirements but failed through an administrative error to request the extension or file the return and election by the original due date. The partnership later filed its return and Form 8996 on the date that would have applied if the extension request had been timely. The IRS treated the QOF self-certification and effective-month choices as regulatory elections eligible for relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. It found that the partnership acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. The Form 8996 was therefore considered timely filed, but the IRS did not rule that the partnership or its investments otherwise met the qualified opportunity fund rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership's late Form 8996 be treated as timely so it can self-certify as a QOF from its formation month?
  • Outcome: approved (the filed Form 8996 was treated as timely)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1, 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202019017 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 5/8/2020 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00
Person To Contact:
------------------------------- ------------------ ID No-----------------
---------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-118715-19
Date:
February 06, 2020

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------
Advisor = ---------------------------------------------------------------


State Z = -------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = -------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Year 1 = --------

Dear ----------------:

This responds to Taxpayer’s request dated August 6, 2019. Specifically, Taxpayer
requests relief under Treasury Regulation §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 for
Taxpayer’s Form 8996 (Qualified Opportunity Fund), as filed on Date 4, to be treated as
timely for purposes of the election: (1) to self-certify the Taxpayer as a qualified
opportunity fund (QOF), as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code); and (2) for the Taxpayer to be treated as a QOF, effective as of the month the
Taxpayer was formed, as provided under Code § 1400Z-2 and Treasury Regulation §
1.1400Z2(d)-1(a).

                                                FACTS

PLR-118715-19 2

According to the information submitted to us, Taxpayer, a partnership organized as a
limited liability company under the laws of State Z, was formed as a QOF on Date 1, for
the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone property as defined in Code
§ 1400Z-2(d)(2). On or around Date 2, Taxpayer’s representatives met with Advisor
regarding the preparation of Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return for Taxpayer’s first
year of operation - Year 1, the year Taxpayer was formed. The information provided by
Taxpayer indicates that Advisor was tasked with preparing and timely filing Taxpayer’s
Federal income tax return and all related forms and elections to self-certify Taxpayer as
a QOF, and to treat Taxpayer as a QOF as of the month Taxpayer was formed.

According to the affidavits and additional information provided to us, Taxpayer and
Advisor were aware of the requirement to file Form 8996 (Qualified Opportunity Fund)
with the Taxpayer’s timely filed Federal income tax return for Year 1 for the Taxpayer to
self-certify QOF status and to be treated as a QOF as of the month Taxpayer was
formed. Advisor was retained by Taxpayer so that Taxpayer could comply with the
Form 8996 requirements and Advisor was expected to file a request for an automatic
extension of time for Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return for Year 1. However,
according to the information submitted to us, Advisor failed to file for an automatic
extension. Additionally, Advisor failed to file Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return and
all related forms and elections by the due date. On Date 3, Advisor informed
Taxpayer’s representatives that the request for automatic extension to file Year 1’s
return was not filed due to an administrative error by Advisor’s firm.

Shortly thereafter, Taxpayer submitted this request asking for relief under Treasury
Regulation §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3. Subsequently, on Date 4 – the due date
that applied if a timely request for an automatic extension had been filed for Year 1 -
Taxpayer filed its Federal income tax return along with Form 8996 signifying its election
to self-certify and be treated as a QOF as of the month the Taxpayer was formed.

                            LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for rules for the
certification of QOFs. Treasury Regulation § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the
self-certification of a QOF must be timely-filed and effectuated annually in such form
and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the
Internal Revenue Service forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 (Qualified Opportunity Fund)
with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be
filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). The information provided
indicates that the Taxpayer did not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its income tax
return (including extensions) due to Advisor’s failure to request an automatic extension
or file the return. Taxpayer filed its first Federal income tax return and Form 8996 on

PLR-118715-19 3

Date 4, the due date that would have applied if Advisor had filed a timely request for an
automatic extension.

Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for electing to be a QOF
and electing to self-certify as a QOF. As such, these elections are regulatory elections,
as defined in section 301.9100-1(b). According to Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-
3(a), requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the
requirements of Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions) must be
made under the rules of Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-3. Additionally, requests for
relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to
establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we
conclude that Taxpayer’s request for extension of time to elect to be a QOF and to self-
certify as a QOF is a regulatory election governed by Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-

  1. We further conclude that, based on the facts and information submitted in connection
    with this request, Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the
    granting of relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly,
    Taxpayer has satisfied the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief, and
    Taxpayer's Form 8996, filed on Date 4, certifying the Taxpayer as a QOF as of the
    month the Taxpayer was formed is considered timely filed.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and
accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This
office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling.
However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual
information, representations, and other data submitted.

This ruling addresses the granting of Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-3 relief as applied
to the election to self-certify the Taxpayer as a QOF by filing Form 8996 for Year 1.
Specifically, we have no opinion, either express or implied, concerning whether any
investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in Treasury
Regulation § 1.1400Z2 (a)–1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under
section 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. We express no opinion
regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other
sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax
treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant
transaction.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

PLR-118715-19 4

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Code § 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling
showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under Code § 6110.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy
of this letter to your authorized representatives.

                                    Sincerely,

                                    Lisa Mojiri-Azad
                                    Assistant to the Branch Chief
                                    Branch 4
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (Income Tax and Accounting)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.