Late Form 8996 treated as timely for qualified opportunity fund status

Number
202019017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Special Rules for Capital Gains Invested in Opportunity Zones
Topics
Code sections
§ 1400Z-2, § 6110
Ruling dated
February 6, 2020
Publicly released
May 8, 2020

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership was formed to operate as a qualified opportunity fund and hired an adviser to prepare its first federal return, request an automatic extension, and file Form 8996. The adviser knew the filing requirements but failed through an administrative error to request the extension or file the return and election by the original due date. The partnership later filed its return and Form 8996 on the date that would have applied if the extension request had been timely. The IRS treated the QOF self-certification and effective-month choices as regulatory elections eligible for relief under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3. It found that the partnership acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government. The Form 8996 was therefore considered timely filed, but the IRS did not rule that the partnership or its investments otherwise met the qualified opportunity fund rules.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership's late Form 8996 be treated as timely so it can self-certify as a QOF from its formation month?
  • Outcome: approved (the filed Form 8996 was treated as timely)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 1400Z-2; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1400Z2(d)-1, 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202019017
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 5/8/2020
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 1400Z.02-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------
------------------ ID No-----------------
----------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:ITA:B04
PLR-118715-19
Date:
February 06, 2020

LEGEND

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------------------
Advisor = ---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Z = -------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------
Date 3 = -------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Year 1 = --------

Dear ----------------:

This responds to Taxpayer’s request dated August 6, 2019. Specifically, Taxpayer requests relief under Treasury Regulation §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 for Taxpayer’s Form 8996 (Qualified Opportunity Fund), as filed on Date 4, to be treated as timely for purposes of the election: (1) to self-certify the Taxpayer as a qualified opportunity fund (QOF), as defined in § 1400Z-2(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code); and (2) for the Taxpayer to be treated as a QOF, effective as of the month the Taxpayer was formed, as provided under Code § 1400Z-2 and Treasury Regulation § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a).

FACTS

PLR-118715-19
2

According to the information submitted to us, Taxpayer, a partnership organized as a limited liability company under the laws of State Z, was formed as a QOF on Date 1, for the purpose of investing in qualified opportunity zone property as defined in Code
§ 1400Z-2(d)(2). On or around Date 2, Taxpayer’s representatives met with Advisor regarding the preparation of Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return for Taxpayer’s first year of operation - Year 1, the year Taxpayer was formed. The information provided by Taxpayer indicates that Advisor was tasked with preparing and timely filing Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return and all related forms and elections to self-certify Taxpayer as a QOF, and to treat Taxpayer as a QOF as of the month Taxpayer was formed.

According to the affidavits and additional information provided to us, Taxpayer and Advisor were aware of the requirement to file Form 8996 (Qualified Opportunity Fund) with the Taxpayer’s timely filed Federal income tax return for Year 1 for the Taxpayer to self-certify QOF status and to be treated as a QOF as of the month Taxpayer was formed. Advisor was retained by Taxpayer so that Taxpayer could comply with the Form 8996 requirements and Advisor was expected to file a request for an automatic extension of time for Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return for Year 1. However, according to the information submitted to us, Advisor failed to file for an automatic extension. Additionally, Advisor failed to file Taxpayer’s Federal income tax return and all related forms and elections by the due date. On Date 3, Advisor informed Taxpayer’s representatives that the request for automatic extension to file Year 1’s return was not filed due to an administrative error by Advisor’s firm.

Shortly thereafter, Taxpayer submitted this request asking for relief under Treasury Regulation §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3. Subsequently, on Date 4 – the due date that applied if a timely request for an automatic extension had been filed for Year 1 - Taxpayer filed its Federal income tax return along with Form 8996 signifying its election to self-certify and be treated as a QOF as of the month the Taxpayer was formed.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1400Z-2(e)(4)(A) directs the Secretary to prescribe regulations for rules for the certification of QOFs. Treasury Regulation § 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) provides that the self-certification of a QOF must be timely-filed and effectuated annually in such form and manner as may be prescribed by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the Internal Revenue Service forms or instructions, or in publications or guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

To self-certify as a QOF, a taxpayer must file Form 8996 (Qualified Opportunity Fund) with its tax return for the year to which the certification applies. The Form 8996 must be filed by the due date of the tax return (including extensions). The information provided indicates that the Taxpayer did not file its Form 8996 by the due date of its income tax return (including extensions) due to Advisor’s failure to request an automatic extension or file the return. Taxpayer filed its first Federal income tax return and Form 8996 on

PLR-118715-19
3

Date 4, the due date that would have applied if Advisor had filed a timely request for an automatic extension.

Section 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(2)(i) sets forth the manner and timing for electing to be a QOF and electing to self-certify as a QOF. As such, these elections are regulatory elections, as defined in section 301.9100-1(b). According to Treasury Regulation § 301.9100- 3(a), requests for extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions) must be made under the rules of Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-3. Additionally, requests for relief subject to § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Based on the facts and information submitted and the representations made, we conclude that Taxpayer’s request for extension of time to elect to be a QOF and to self- certify as a QOF is a regulatory election governed by Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-

  1. We further conclude that, based on the facts and information submitted in connection
    with this request, Taxpayer has acted reasonably and in good faith, and that the granting of relief would not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, Taxpayer has satisfied the requirements of the regulations for the granting of relief, and Taxpayer's Form 8996, filed on Date 4, certifying the Taxpayer as a QOF as of the month the Taxpayer was formed is considered timely filed.

This ruling is based upon facts and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for a ruling. However, as part of an examination process, the Service may verify the factual information, representations, and other data submitted.

This ruling addresses the granting of Treasury Regulation § 301.9100-3 relief as applied to the election to self-certify the Taxpayer as a QOF by filing Form 8996 for Year 1. Specifically, we have no opinion, either express or implied, concerning whether any investments made into Taxpayer are qualifying investments as defined in Treasury Regulation § 1.1400Z2 (a)–1(b)(34) or whether Taxpayer meets the requirements under section 1400Z-2 and the regulations thereunder to be a QOF. We express no opinion regarding the tax treatment of the instant transaction under the provisions of any other sections of the Code or regulations that may be applicable, or regarding the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or effects resulting from, the instant transaction.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any tax return to which it is relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the letter ruling.

PLR-118715-19
4

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Code § 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent. Enclosed is a copy of the letter ruling showing the deletions proposed to be made when it is disclosed under Code § 6110.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Lisa Mojiri-Azad
Assistant to the Branch Chief
Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Income Tax and Accounting)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace