Missed ESBT elections treated as inadvertent S corporation termination
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An S corporation's shares were held by a grantor trust whose deemed owner died. The trust remained an eligible S shareholder for two years after the owner's death, but no ESBT election was made when that period expired, terminating the corporation's S status. The shares were later transferred to a second trust, which also failed to make a timely ESBT election and would have caused another termination. The company and shareholders continued to treat the company as an S corporation and represented that the failures were inadvertent. The IRS restored S treatment from the first termination date under section 1362(f). Relief required ESBT elections for both trusts with their respective effective dates and all necessary original or amended returns within 120 days; otherwise, the ruling would be void.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May the corporation retain S status after two successive shareholder trusts failed to make timely ESBT elections?
- Outcome: approved (both potential terminations were treated as inadvertent, subject to corrective elections and returns)
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c) and (e), and 1362(d) and (f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(m)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 202019010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 5/8/2020 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1361.01-00, 1361.01-02,
1361.03-03, 1362.00-00, Person To Contact:
1362.01-00, 1362.04-00 -------------------, ID No. -----------------
Telephone Number:
---------------------- --------------------
----------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------- CC:PSI:01
-------------------------------- PLR-114370-19
Date:
December 16, 2019
LEGEND
X = --------------------------------------------
Trust 1 = -----------------------------------------------
Trust 2 = --------------------------------------
A = -------------------
Date 1 = --------------------------
Date 2 = ----------------------
Date 3 = ---------------------------
Date 4 = ---------------------------
Date 5 = -------------------------
State = -------------
Years = ---------------
Dear -------------:
This responds to a letter dated June 17, 2019, and supplemental information, submitted
on behalf of X by X's authorized representatives, requesting relief under section 1362(f)
of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).
PLR-114370-19 2
FACTS
According to the information submitted and representations within, X was incorporated
on Date 1, under the laws of State. Effective Date 2, X elected to be taxed as an S
corporation. A was the grantor of Trust 1, a shareholder of X. A died on Date 3. Trust 1
was a permitted S corporation shareholder under § 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) until Date 4.
However, an Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT) election effective Date 4 was not
timely filed for Trust 1. Accordingly, Trust 1 became an ineligible shareholder of X and
X's S corporation election terminated on Date 4. On Date 5, Trust 1’s shares in X were
transferred to Trust 2. A timely ESBT election was not filed for Trust 2. If X’s S
corporation had not terminated on Date 4, it would have terminated on Date 5 upon the
transfer of Trust 1’s X stock to Trust 2.
X represents that Trust 1 and Trust 2 have at all times met the requirements of an ESBT
within the meaning of § 1361(d)(3), except that the trustees of Trust 1 and Trust 2 did
not make timely ESBT elections under § 1361(e)(3). X further represents that Trust 2
has not filed its income tax returns consistent with being an ESBT for Years.
X represents that, other than the failure to make valid ESBT elections, X has qualified
as a small business corporation at all times since its election on Date 2. X further
represents that X and its shareholders have treated X as an S corporation at all relevant
times. In addition, X represents that X has filed its income tax returns consistent with
having a valid S election in effect for all taxable years since X elected to be an S
corporation.
X represents that its S corporation election termination was inadvertent and was not
motivated by tax avoidance or retroactive tax planning. Further, X represents that X
and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of
obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule as provided under § 1362(f) that
may be required by the Secretary.
LAW AND ANALYSIS
Section 1361(a)(1) of the Code provides that the term “S corporation” means, with
respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under §
1362(a) is in effect for such year.
Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation
which is not an ineligible corporation and which does not (A) have more than 100
shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust
described in § 1361(c)(2), or an organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an
individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1
class of stock.
PLR-114370-19 3
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii) provides that a trust which was described in § 1361(c)(2)(A)(i)
immediately before the death of the deemed owner and which continues in existence
after such death may be an S corporation shareholder, but only for the 2-year period
beginning on the day of the deemed owner’s death.
Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(v) provides that, for purposes of § 1362(b)(1)(B), an electing
small business trust (ESBT) may be an S corporation shareholder.
Section 1361(e)(1)(A) provides that an ESBT means any trust if (i) such trust does not
have as a beneficiary any person other than (I) an individual, (II) an estate, (III) an
organization described in § 170(c)(2), (3), (4), or (5), or (IV) an organization described in
§ 170(c)(1) which holds a contingent interest in such trust and is not a potential current
beneficiary, (ii) no interest in such trust was acquired by purchase, and (iii) an election
under § 1361(e) applies to such trust.
Section 1361(e)(1)(B) provides that the term “electing small business trust” shall not
include (i) any qualified subchapter S trust (as defined in § 1361(d)(3)) if an election
under § 1361(d)(2) applies to any corporation the stock of which is held by such trust,
(ii) any trust exempt from tax under subtitle A, and (iii) any charitable remainder annuity
trust or charitable remainder unitrust (as defined in § 664(d)).
Section 1361(e)(3) provides that an election under § 1361(e) shall be made by the
trustee. Any such election shall apply to the taxable year of the trust for which made and
all subsequent taxable years of such trust unless revoked with the consent of the
Secretary.
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i) provides that the trustee of an ESBT must make the ESBT
election by signing and filing, with the service center where the S corporation files its
income tax return, a statement that meets the requirements of § 1.1361-1(m)(2)(ii).
Section 1.1361-1(m)(2)(iii) provides that the trustee of an ESBT must file the ESBT
election within the time requirements prescribed in § 1.1361-1(j)(6)(iii) for filing a QSST
election (generally within the 16-day-and-2-month period beginning on the day that the
stock is transferred to the trust).
Section 1362(d)(2) provides that an S corporation election will be terminated whenever
(at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the corporation is
an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation.
Section 1362(f) provides, in relevant part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any
corporation was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined without
regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of § 1361(b) or
was terminated under § 1362(d)(2) or (3); (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent; (3) no
later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in
PLR-114370-19 4
such ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which
the election was made or termination occurred is a small business corporation; and (4)
the corporation for which the election was made or termination occurred, and each
person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period
specified pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make the adjustments (consistent with the
treatment of such corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary
with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in such
ineffectiveness or termination, such corporation shall be treated as an S corporation
during the period specified by the Secretary.
CONCLUSION
Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X's
S election was inadvertently terminated within the meaning of § 1362(f) on Date 4
because Trust 1 became an ineligible shareholder of X. We further conclude that, if X’s
S corporation election had not terminated on Date 4, then it would have terminated on
Date 5 when the X stock was transferred from Trust 1 to Trust 2. Pursuant to the
provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation from Date 4 and thereafter,
provided X's S corporation election is otherwise effective and not terminated under
§ 1362(d).
This letter ruling is subject to the following conditions: (1) Within 120 days from the date
of this letter, an election to treat Trust 1 as an ESBT effective Date 4 and Trust 2 as an
ESBT effective Date 5 must be made with the appropriate service center; and (2) X and
its shareholders must file any necessary original or amended returns consistent with the
relief granted in this letter within 120 days of this letter, including but not limited to
income tax returns for all open tax years reflecting the treatment of Trust 2 as an ESBT.
A copy of this letter should be attached to the ESBT elections and any original or
amended returns. If these conditions are not met, then this letter ruling is null and void.
Furthermore, if these conditions are not met, X must send notification that its S election
has terminated to the service center with which X’s S election was filed.
Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X's eligibility to be an S
corporation.
This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3),
this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-114370-19 5
Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this
letter to your authorized representatives.
Sincerely,
Joy C. Spies
Joy C. Spies
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)
Enclosures (2)
Copy of letter
Copy of letter for §6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.