Determination Letter 202017032 Released April 24, 2020 Approved Transcribed from scan

Historic building restoration set-aside approved

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A private foundation proposed a grant to a public charity restoring a historic building as a community center for culture, education, and neighborhood revitalization. The grant would fund about one-third of the project and depended on the charity raising matching funds, submitting plans for approval, demonstrating enough money to finish, and limiting spending to direct project costs. The foundation sought a set-aside so the charity would have roughly three years to conduct its capital campaign while the foundation retained quality control over the historic restoration. The IRS agreed that matching-fund needs and preservation oversight made the project better suited to a set-aside than an immediate payment. It approved the set-aside under section 4942(g)(2), subject to payment by the specified date within 60 months.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the foundation treat a conditional matching grant for historic building restoration as a qualifying set-aside?
  • Outcome: approved (the grant had to be paid by the stated date within the five-year limit)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 170(c)(2)(B) and 4942(e), (f), and (g)(2); Treas. Reg. § 53.4942(a)-3(b); Rev. Rul. 74-450

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Number: 202017032
Release Date: 4/24/2020 Employer Identification Number:

Date: January 30, 2020
Contact Person - ID Number:

Contact Telephone Number:

LEGEND UIL

x dollars = Amount 4942.03-07
M = Name

N = Name

y dollars = Amount

B = Date

C = Date

D = Date

E = Date

Dear

Why you are receiving this letter

This is our response to your August 23, 2019 letter requesting approval of a set-
aside under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 4942(g)(2). You’ve been
recognized as tax-exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3) and have been determined
to be a private foundation under IRC Section 509(a).

Our determination

Based on the information furnished, your set-aside program is approved under
IRC Section 4942(g)(2). As required under Section 4942(g)(2), the set aside
amount must be paid within the 60-month period after the date of the first set-
aside.

Description of set-aside request

You wish to set aside a grant of x dollars to M, a public charity recognized as tax-
exempt under IRC Section 501(c)(3). M owns and maintains the historic N building
and was organized to restore the building and drive revitalization of the blighted
surrounding neighborhood. M seeks to transform the building so it can once again
serve the community by functioning as a center for culture, community, and
education in the local area.

M has proposed a project to restore the building consistent with historic

preservation standards. The total cost of the project is estimated to be y dollars.
The purpose of your grant is to assist in funding the project.

Your grant is the subject of a grant agreement between you and M. Under the
terms of the agreement, you will make a grant of x dollars to M to fund
approximately one-third of the estimated cost of the project if certain conditions are
satisfied. Those conditions include:

• On or before B, M must receive matching contributions to fund
approximately two-thirds of the project cost and submit evidence of same to
you;

• On or before C, M must submit to you the drawings, plans, and
specifications for the project and you must approve same in writing;

• On or before D, M must provide you with satisfactory assurances that it has
sufficient funds to complete the project;

• M must agree to use the funds solely for direct costs incurred to procure
labor, materials, fees, permits, and other similar items for the project.

If M satisfies the terms of the agreement, you will distribute the funds to it within 21
business days.

The project can be better accomplished by use of a set-aside because the grant
requires the use of a matching-grant program and the preservation of control over
the quality of the project. Regarding the matching-grant program, you believe that,
due to the extent and cost of the rehabilitation and restoration needed for the
building, grants from the community must form an essential and significant part of
the project funding. Through the matching-grant program, you hope to encourage
other donors to support the project. The approximate three-year period provided in
the project agreement to raise the necessary matching funds has been mutually
agreed by you and M as allowing sufficient time for M to complete its anticipated
capital campaign for the project.

In terms of quality control, it is important that you retain a degree of control over
the renovation process because you wish to preserve the historical features of the
building. By making the disbursement of the funds dependent upon approval of
outside consultants and contractors and of drawings, plans, and specifications of
the project, you believe you can best meet the goal of restoring the building and
assure that the final restoration project is consistent in scope and concept with the
project M originally submitted to you.

The payment must be made to M no later than E, which is fewer than 60 months
from the date of the set-aside.

Basis for our determination

IRC Section 4942(g)(2)(A) states that an amount set aside for a specific project,
which includes one or more purposes described in IRC Section 170(c)(2)(B), may

be treated as a qualifying distribution if it meets the requirements of Section
4942(g)(2)(B).

IRC Section 4942(g)(2)(B) states that an amount set aside for a specific project
will meet the requirements of this subparagraph if, at the time of the set-aside, the
foundation establishes that the amount will be paid within five years and either
clause (i) or (ii) are satisfied.

IRC Section 4942(g)(2)(B)(i) is satisfied if, at the time of the set-aside, the private
foundation establishes that the project can better be accomplished using the set-
aside than by making an immediate payment.

Treasury Regulations Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(1) provides that a private
foundation may establish a project as better accomplished by a set-aside than by
immediate payment if the set-aside satisfies the suitability test described in Treas.
Reg. Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2).

Treas. Reg. Section 53.4942(a)-3(b)(2) provides that specific projects better
accomplished using a set-aside include, but are not limited to, projects where
relatively long-term expenditures must be made requiring more than one year’s
income to assure their continuity.

In Revenue Ruling 74-450, 1974-2 C.B. 388, an operating foundation converted a
portion of newly acquired land into a public park under a four-year construction
contract. The construction contract payments were to be made mainly during the
final two years. This constituted a “specific project.” The foundation’s set-aside of
all its excess earnings for four years was treated as a qualifying distribution under
IRC Section 4942(g)(2).

What you must do

Your approved set-aside(s) will be documented on your records as pledges or
obligations to be paid by the date specified. The amounts set aside will be
considered to determine your minimum investment return under IRC Section
4942(e)(1)(A), and the income attributable to your set aside(s) will also be
considered in computing your adjusted net income under IRC Section 4942(f).

Additional information

This determination is directed only to the organization that requested it. IRC
Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as a precedent.

Please keep a copy of this letter in your records. We have sent a copy of this letter
to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.

If you have any questions, please contact the person listed in the heading of this
letter.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.