Private Letter Ruling 202017016 Released April 24, 2020 Approved

Investment company receives 90 days for a foreign-tax pass-through election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A regulated investment company intended to elect under section 853 to pass through foreign taxes to its shareholders. Its timely Form 1120-RIC consistently reflected that election, but the contractor preparing the return omitted the required Form 1118 after the responsible employee and reviewer left the department. The company discovered the omission before the IRS did and represented that relief would not lower its aggregate tax liability or use hindsight. The IRS concluded that the company satisfied the regulatory standards for late-election relief. It granted 90 days to make the section 853 election for the affected tax year.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the regulated investment company make a late section 853 election after omitting Form 1118 from its timely return?
  • Outcome: approved (90-day extension granted)
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 851, 852, 853, 901; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.853-4, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                      Department of the Treasury
                                                              Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202017016                                             Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/24/2020                                       Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 853.00-00, 853.01-00,
              9100.00-00                                      Person To Contact:
                                                              -------------------------, ID No. -----------------
---------------------------                                   -----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------                            Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------                       --------------------
------------------------------                                Refer Reply To:
---------------------------------                             CC:FIP:B01
                                                              PLR-101771-20
                                                              Date:
                                                              January 28, 2020



Legend:

Taxpayer            =      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           -----------------------------------
Manager             =      ------------------------------------------------
Contractor          =      ---------------------------------------------
Date 1              =      --------------------------
Date 2              =      -----------------------
Date 3              =      --------------------------

Dear ---------------------:

       This ruling responds to a letter dated December 27, 2019 submitted on behalf of
Taxpayer. Taxpayer requests an extension of time under sections 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election under
section 853 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for the taxable year ended on
Date 1.

                                                     FACTS

       Taxpayer is registered as a non-diversified, closed-end investment company
under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and has elected to be taxed
as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under part I of subchapter M of chapter 1 of
the Code. Taxpayer uses the calendar year as its taxable year and an accrual method
of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

       For its taxable year ended Date 1, Taxpayer represents that it satisfied the
requirements of section 853 and qualified to pass through to its shareholders the
deduction or credit for the foreign taxes Taxpayer paid.

PLR-101771-20                                 2

       Taxpayer contracts with Manager to provide or procure administrative and other
services, including the preparation and filing of domestic and foreign tax reports and
monitoring Taxpayer’s compliance with all applicable tax laws and regulations.
Manager is permitted to contract with other entities to fulfill its duties to Taxpayer and
has contracted with Contractor to prepare and file for Taxpayer domestic and foreign tax
reports, including income tax returns, and monitor compliance with subchapter M and all
other applicable tax laws and regulations.

       Contractor, on behalf of Taxpayer, timely filed on Date 2 Taxpayer’s Form 1120-
RIC, U.S. Federal Income Tax Return for Regulated Investment Companies, for its
taxable year ended Date 1. On this Form 1120-RIC, Taxpayer indicated that it met the
requirements of section 853(a) and section 901(k) and elected to pass through to its
shareholders the deduction or credit for foreign taxes that Taxpayer paid (Schedule K,
item 10a). Consistent with that election, Taxpayer’s Form 1120-RIC did not reflect a
deduction (line 12) or a credit (Schedule J, line 3a) for Taxpayer’s foreign taxes, and it
did include Taxpayer’s foreign taxes as an addition to the dividends paid deduction
under section 853(b)(1)(B) (Schedule A, line 6).

         The Form 1120-RIC, however, was filed without Form 1118, Foreign Tax
Credit—Corporations, attached thereto. Taxpayer became aware of the failure to
include Form 1118 with its Form 1120-RIC on Date 3. Prior to the time that the return
was due, the employee responsible for filing Taxpayer’s federal income tax return, on
behalf of Contractor, and the supervising employee responsible for reviewing the return,
left the department. Because of the departures, the remaining employees responsible
for filing the return on behalf of Contractor did not realize that a Form 1118 was not
attached to Taxpayer’s Form 1120-RIC when it was filed. Because Taxpayer’s Form
1118 was not timely filed with Taxpayer’s Form 1120-RIC, Taxpayer cannot make a
timely election under section 853 absent the requested relief.

        In all taxable years prior to the taxable year ended Date 1, Taxpayer has
qualified for and elected to pass through the foreign taxes it has paid in a given taxable
year to its shareholders and properly included Form 1118 supporting such an election
with its timely filed Form 1120-RIC.

      Taxpayer makes the following additional representations in connection with its
request for an extension of time:

       1. The request for relief was filed before the failure to make the regulatory
election was discovered by the Service.

       2. Granting the relief requested will not result in Taxpayer having a lower U.S.
federal tax liability in the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than
Taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into account the
time value of money).

PLR-101771-20                                3

       3. Taxpayer does not seek to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related
penalty has been or could have been imposed under section 6662 of the Code at the
time Taxpayer requested relief and the new position requires or permits the regulatory
election for which relief is requested.

      4. Being fully informed of the required regulatory election and related tax
consequences, Taxpayer did not choose to not file the election.

      5. Taxpayer is not using hindsight in making the decision to seek the relief
requested. No specific facts have changed since the due date for making the election
that make the election advantageous to Taxpayer.

       6. The period of limitations on assessment under section 6501(a) has not expired
for Taxpayer for the taxable year in which the election should have been filed, nor for
any taxable year(s) that would have been affected by the election had the election been
timely filed.

       In addition, affidavits on behalf of Taxpayer and Manager have been provided as
required by sections 301.9100-3(e)(2) and (3).

                                 LAW AND ANALYSIS

       Section 853(a) provides that a RIC, more than 50 percent of the value (as
defined in section 851(c)(4)) of whose total assets at the close of the taxable year
consist of stock or securities in foreign corporations, and which meets the requirements
of section 852(a) for the taxable year, may elect the application of section 853 for the
taxable year with respect to certain taxes paid by the RIC during the taxable year to
foreign countries and possessions of the United States.

       Section 853(b)(1) provides that the effect of the election is to deny an electing
RIC any deduction under section 164(a) or any credit under section 901 for these taxes.
The electing RIC is allowed an addition to its dividends paid deduction for the taxable
year for the amount of these taxes.

      Section 853(b)(2) further describes the effect of the election by providing that
each shareholder of the RIC shall include in gross income and treat as paid by him his
proportionate share of these taxes. Each shareholder shall treat as gross income from
sources within the respective foreign countries and possessions of the United States the
sum of his proportionate share of these taxes and the portion of any dividend paid by
the RIC which represents income derived from sources within foreign countries and
possessions of the United States.

       Section 853(c) provides that the amount to be treated by the shareholder as his
proportionate share of taxes paid to any foreign country or possession of the United
States, and gross income derived from sources within any foreign country or possession

PLR-101771-20                                 4

of the United States, shall not exceed the amounts so reported by the RIC in a written
statement furnished to the shareholder.

       Sections 1.853-4(a) and (b) of the Income Tax Regulations provide that an
election under section 853 must be made not later than the time prescribed for filing the
return (including extensions thereof), and is irrevocable with respect to the dividend (or
portion thereof), and the foreign taxes paid with respect thereto, to which the election
applies.

       Section 1.853-4(c) requires that certain information pertinent to the election,
including, among other things, the date, form and contents of its notice to its
shareholders, shall accompany the RIC' s timely filed federal income tax return for the
taxable year on or with a modified Form 1118.

        Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but
no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all
subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines a
regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by regulations or by a
revenue ruling, a revenue procedure, a notice, or an announcement published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin.

        Section 301.9100-3(a) through (c)(1) sets forth rules that the Service generally
will use to determine whether, under the particular facts and circumstances of each
situation, the Commissioner will grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of section 301.9100-2. Section 301.9100-3(a) provides
that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides
the evidence (including affidavits described in section 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith,
and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

        Section 301.9100-3(b) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) requests relief under this section before
the failure to make the regulatory election is discovered by the Service; (ii) failed to
make the election because of intervening events beyond the taxpayer's control; (iii)
failed to make the election because, after exercising reasonable diligence (taking into
account the taxpayer's experience and the complexity of the return or issue), the
taxpayer was unaware of the necessity for the election; (iv) reasonably relied on the
written advice of the Service; or (v) reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional,
including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to
make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election. A taxpayer will be deemed to have
not acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer (i) seeks to alter a return position
for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under section
6662 at the time the taxpayer requests relief and the new position requires or permits a
regulatory election for which relief is requested; (ii) was informed in all material respects

PLR-101771-20                                   5

of the required election and related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election;
or (iii) uses hindsight in requesting relief.

        Section 301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that a reasonable extension of time to make a
regulatory election will be granted only when the interests of the Government will not be
prejudiced by the granting of relief. Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(i) provides that the
interests of the Government are prejudiced if granting relief would result in the taxpayer
having a lower tax liability in the aggregate for all taxable years affected by the election
than the taxpayer would have had if the election had been timely made (taking into
account the time value of money). Section 301.9100-3(c)(1)(ii) provides that the
interests of the Government are ordinarily prejudiced if the taxable year in which the
regulatory election should have been made or any taxable years that would have been
affected by the election had it been timely made are closed by the period of limitations
on assessment under section 6501(a) before the taxpayer's receipt of a ruling granting
relief under this section.

                                       CONCLUSIONS

       Based on the information submitted and representations made we conclude that
Taxpayer has satisfied the requirements for granting a reasonable extension of time to
elect under section 853 for the taxable year ended on Date 1. Accordingly, Taxpayer
has 90 days from the date of this letter to make its intended election.

       This ruling is limited to the timeliness of the filing of the election in section 853 of
the Code. This ruling's application is limited to the facts, representations, Code
sections, and regulations cited herein. No opinion is expressed with regard to whether
Taxpayer otherwise qualifies as a RIC under subchapter M of chapter 1 of the Code.

       No opinion is expressed with regard to whether the tax liability of Taxpayer is not
lower in the aggregate for all years to which the election applies than such tax liability
would have been if the election had been timely made (taking into account the time
value of money). Upon audit of the federal income tax returns involved, the director's
office will determine such tax liability for the years involved. If the director's office
determines that such tax liability is lower, that office will determine the federal income
tax effect.

       This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-101771-20                                 6


        In accordance with the terms of a power of attorney on file in this office, copies of
this letter are being sent to your authorized representatives.

                                       Sincerely,



                                       _________________________
                                       Steven Harrison
                                       Branch Chief, Branch 1
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Financial Institutions and Products)




cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.