Private Letter Ruling 202008003 Released February 21, 2020 Approved

Renewable energy partnership receives time to elect investment tax credits

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A partnership with a tax equity investor intended to claim investment tax credits instead of production tax credits for renewable energy facilities. Its return preparer said it intended and believed it had timely mailed Form 7004, but could not locate certified-mail proof, and the IRS treated the extension and partnership return as late. The IRS concluded that the partnership satisfied the standards for discretionary election relief, including reasonable reliance on a qualified tax professional. It granted 120 days to make the section 48(a)(5) election in the manner required by Notice 2009-52. The relief did not extend the partnership return's filing deadline or decide whether the facilities and claimed credit otherwise qualified.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late election to claim section 48 investment tax credits instead of section 45 production tax credits?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 45 and 48(a)(5); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Notice 2009-52

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 202008003                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/21/2020                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.02-04
                                                               Person To Contact:
-----------------                                              ----------------------, ID No. ------------
-------------------------                                      Telephone Number:
--------------------                                           --------------------
------------------------------------                           Refer Reply To:
----------------------------                                   CC:PSI:B06
                                                               PLR-113920-19
                                                               Date:
                                                               November 14, 2019


In Re: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------

LEGEND:

Taxpayer          =         --------------------
---------------------------------------------------

Taxable Year =             --------------------------------------------

Firm              =        -----------------------

Date A            =        ----------------

Date B            =        --------------------------



Dear ------------:

       This is in response to a letter dated June 13, 2019, submitted on behalf of
Taxpayer, requesting extensions of time under §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to make a late election under § 48(a)(5) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to claim the investment tax credit (ITC) determined
under § 48 in lieu of the production tax credit (PTC) under § 45 with respect to certain
renewable energy facilities for Taxable Year.


                                                        FACTS

       According to the information submitted, Taxpayer represents that the facts are as
follows.
PLR-113920-19                                 2

       Taxpayer is a partnership formed with a tax equity investor, who entered into the
partnership with the expectation of obtaining an ITC by means of making a § 48(a)(5)
election (ITC election) to treat qualified facilities as energy property.

       In order to file the forms needed to make the ITC election Taxpayer engaged
Firm for return preparation services, which included preparing and filing Form 1065,
U.S. Return of Partnership Income, well as Form 7004, Application for Automatic
Extension of Time to File Certain Business Income Tax, Information, and Other Returns
(Form 7004), on behalf of Taxpayer, which would have extended the due date of
Taxpayer’s initial Form 1065 to June 15, 2019.

        On Date A, Taxpayer received notice from the Internal Revenue Service that the
Taxpayer’s Form 7004 and Form 1065 had been received on Date B, after the due date
for the Form 1065, and that the Form 1065 was therefore late and that Taxpayer was
unable to make the election under § 48(a)(5). After receiving this notice, Taxpayer
contacted Firm, who ultimately advised Taxpayer to seek relief under Treas. Reg. §
301.9100-3.

        Firm has asserted, under penalty of perjury, that it had intended at all times to
timely file Form 7004, which would have extended the due date of the Taxpayers
election, believes that it timely filed the Form 7004, but cannot locate proof of certified
mailing of the Form 7004 to the Internal Revenue Service to demonstrate such timely
filing.

                                      LAW AND ANALYSIS

       Section 48(a)(5) provides, in part, that a taxpayer may irrevocably elect to claim
the investment tax credit determined under § 48 in lieu of the production tax credit under
§ 45 with respect to certain renewable facilities.

        Section 48(a)(5)(A) provides that qualified property that is part of a qualified
investment credit facility shall be treated as energy property for purposes of § 48, and
that the energy percentage with respect to such property shall be 30 percent. Section
48(a)(5)(C) provides that taxpayers may elect to treat qualified facilities (within the
meaning of § 45) as qualified investment credit facilities. Section 48(a)(5)(B) provides
that no credit shall be allowed under § 45 for any taxable year with respect to any
qualified investment credit facility.

        Notice 2009-52, 2009-25 I.R.B. (1094), provides, in part, that an election to treat
a qualified facility as a qualified investment credit facility and claim the investment tax
credit determined under § 48 in lieu of the production tax credit under § 45 will be
effective if it is made in the manner and time set forth in the notice.

      Section 2.01 of Notice 2009-52 provides, in part, that to make the election with
respect to a qualified facility, a taxpayer must claim the energy credit with respect to
PLR-113920-19                                  3

qualified property that is an integral part of the facility on a completed Form 3468 and
file such Form with the taxpayer’s income tax return for the year in which the property is
placed in service.

         Section 2.03 of Notice 2009-52 provides that the election to claim the investment
tax credit determined under § 48 in lieu of the production tax credit under § 45 must be
made on a timely filed return (including extensions) for the taxable year in which the
facility that is to be treated as a qualified investment credit facility is placed in service.

      Section 301.9100-1(a) provides that the regulations under this section and
§§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 establish the standards the Commissioner will use to
determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. An
extension of time is available for elections that a taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make.
However, the granting of an extension of time is not a determination that the taxpayer is
otherwise eligible to make the election.

       Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “regulatory election” includes an
election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue
Bulletin.

       Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a
regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the
case of taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G,
H, and I.

       Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for
regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

        Section 301.9100-3 provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting
relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

      Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

       Section 301.9100-3(b)(2) provides that a taxpayer will not be considered to have
reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional if the taxpayer knew or should have
known that the professional was not competent to render advice on the regulatory
election or aware of all relevant facts.
PLR-113920-19                                 4

       Section 301.9100-3(b)(3)(ii) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have not
acted reasonably or in good faith if the taxpayer was informed in all material respects of
the required election and related tax consequences, but chose not to file the election.

       The § 48(a)(5) election is a regulatory election within the meaning of Regulation
§ 301.9100-1(b), because the due date for making the election is set forth in Notice
2009-52. The § 48(a)(5) election is not expressly excepted from 9100 Relief, and there
is no alternative late election relief procedure provided by a statute, regulation or other
published guidance.

                                      CONCLUSION

        Based solely on the information submitted and representations made, we
conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this
letter to make an election under § 48(a)(5) for Taxable Year to elect to claim the
investment tax credit determined under § 48 in lieu of the production tax credit under §
45 with respect to its renewable facilities.

      The election under § 48(a)(5) must comply with all of the requirements of Notice
2009-52.

      In making the elections, Taxpayer should also attach copies of this letter to the
amended returns for Taxable Year. We have enclosed copies of this letter for that
purpose.

      This letter ruling does not grant an extension of time for filing Taxpayer’s federal
income tax return for Taxable Year.

       Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the
federal tax consequences of the facts described above. In particular, we express or
imply no opinion on whether Taxpayer satisfies the requirements of § 48(a)(5), or other
applicable portions of §§ 48 and 45 and whether the credit amount claimed is correct.

       This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

      The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information submitted and
representations made by Taxpayer and Taxpayer’s representatives and accompanied
by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. Although this office
has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is
subject to verification on examination.
PLR-113920-19                                  5

         In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.



                                           Sincerely,



                                           Patrick S. Kirwan
                                           Branch Chief, Branch 6
                                           Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                           (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



Enclosures (2)
      Copy of this letter
      Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.