Determination Letter 202004011 Released January 24, 2020 Denied Transcribed from scan

Sliding-scale auto repair shop denied charitable status

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2020, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2020
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An organization planned to operate an auto repair shop for the general public, using a sliding fee scale tied to household income. Some customers would pay normal market rates, the organization could prioritize full-paying customers when income was needed, and it planned to advertise through commercial channels while competing with local for-profit shops. The IRS concluded that selling repair services was the organization’s primary purpose and was conducted in a commercially ordinary manner, even though some low-income customers would receive discounts. The articles also failed to limit the organization to exempt purposes or ensure that assets would pass to section 501(c)(3) purposes on dissolution. The IRS therefore denied exemption under section 501(c)(3).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does a sliding-scale auto repair business serving the general public qualify as charitable under section 501(c)(3)?
  • Outcome: denied, because the repair shop had a substantial commercial purpose and its organizing document failed the purpose and dissolution requirements
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1)(i), 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(4), 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1), 1.501(c)(3)-1(e)(1); Rev. Rul. 73-127

Full text (IRS public release)

Transcriber's note: this document is a nine-page scan containing a final no-protest determination and the earlier proposed adverse determination. Obvious OCR errors in agency headings, form labels, bullets, citations, spacing, and punctuation were corrected by comparison with every page image. Redacted identifying fields and percentages are marked [redacted], while legend placeholders remain as printed. Original grammatical and typographical irregularities are preserved. The wording is otherwise preserved verbatim.

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service

P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Release Number: 202004011
Release Date: 1/24/2020
UIL Number: 501.03-30; 501.36-01

Date: October 29, 2019
Employer ID number: [redacted]
Contact person/ID number: [redacted]
Contact telephone number: [redacted]
Form you must file: [redacted]
Tax years: [redacted]

Dear [redacted]:

This letter is our final determination that you don’t qualify for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Recently, we sent you a proposed adverse determination in response to your
application. The proposed adverse determination explained the facts, law, and basis for our conclusion, and it
gave you 30 days to file a protest. Because we didn’t receive a protest within the required 30 days, the proposed
determination is now final.

Because you don’t qualify as a tax-exempt organization under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code, donors can’t
deduct contributions to you under Section 170 of the Code. You must file federal income tax returns for the tax
years listed at the top of this letter using the required form (also listed at the top of this letter) within 30 days of
this letter unless you request an extension of time to file.

We'll make this final adverse determination letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for
public inspection (as required under Section 6110 of the Code) after deleting certain identifying information.
Please read the enclosed Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose, and review the two attached letters that
show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in the Notice
437 on how to notify us. If you agree with our deletions, you don’t need to take any further action.

We’ll also notify the appropriate state officials of our determination by sending them a copy of this final letter
and the proposed determination letter (under Section 6104(c) of the Code). You should contact your state
officials if you have questions about how this determination will affect your state responsibilities and
requirements.

Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S


If you have questions about this letter, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter. If you have
questions about your federal income tax status and responsibilities, call our customer service number at

1-800-829-1040 (TTY 1-800-829-4933 for deaf or hard of hearing) or customer service for businesses at
1-800-829-4933.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosures:

Notice 437

Redacted Letter 4036, Proposed Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501(c)(3)
Redacted Letter 4038, Final Adverse Determination Under IRC Section 501(c)(3) - No Protest

Letter 4038 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47632S

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: October June 18, 2019

Employer ID number: [redacted]
Contact person/ID number: [redacted]
Contact telephone number: [redacted]
Contact fax number: [redacted]

Legend: UIL:

D = Date 501.03-30
E = State 501.36-01
X percent =

y percent =

Dear [redacted]:

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Internal Revenue
Code (IRC) Section 501(a). We determined that you don’t qualify for exemption under IRC Section 501(c)(3).
This letter explains the reasons for our conclusion. Please keep it for your records.

Issue:
Do you qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code? No, for the reasons stated below.

Facts:
You were incorporated as a nonprofit corporation on D in State of E.

Your Articles of Incorporation refer to an attachment for your purpose. The attachment states:

Due to the fact that (we) will be a Non-Profit and be just as qualified as (our)
competitors, (we) will attract people who are able to pay the normal rate at a shop
because (we) will have an immediate sense of trust. For the customers who are
able to pay competitive rates, we will use those profits against our higher margins
to a self-sufficient Non-Profit while still being able to help those who need it.

The attachment goes on to state: “(We are) not just an average mechanic shop. Running as a Non-Profit will set
(our) business apart from any other mechanic shops while also being able to offer services to parts of our
society that were previously unable to get the extra support they needed.” Your Articles also state that in the
event of a voluntary dissolution, all assets will be sold and the money will go to another non-profit.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K

Your only activity is the operation of an automobile general repair and service shop. You will provide the
service of doing automobile maintenance and repair for the general public. Your services will be conducted by a
mechanic who will be employed by you. You state the activity that will further your exempt purpose is doing
the automobile repair. The general public needing the vehicle repair work done will bring their vehicle to your
shop. Once the mechanic has diagnosed the issue the vehicle is having, you will give the customer a quote of
the repair work. The amount the customer pays will be dependent on a sliding scale fee based on the Federal
Poverty Guideline (FPG). Depending on the household’s yearly income relative to the FPG, the customer may
receive a discount. This discount can be up to x percent of the FPG. This will make the amount due for the work
decrease. The lower the income of the household, the lower the amount that the customer will owe on the
vehicle service. If the household income does not fall in the relative FPG threshold, the customer will not pay
more than a normal market rate for the services. You will continually evaluate the rate of the scale to ensure
your customers are receiving fair prices based on the current market. You state you will only be a maintenance
and service provider and that y percent of your time will be allocated to providing repair services to the public.
Because the final bill to the customer is dependent on income, the amount paid to you will vary for every job.
You will be funded by the amount that is paid by each customer as well as donations from the public.

Based on your response to our additional information request, less than [redacted]% of the population in your county
will qualify for free services, about [redacted]% are in income brackets where they will receive a discount ranging from [redacted]%-[redacted]%, and the remaining [redacted]% will not receive a discount and will be charged the normal market rate. You state
that you may restrict discounted services if you need income to continue and there is already a full paying
customer waiting to be scheduled. You also state that if there is shop time that has not been scheduled, and no
full paying customer waiting, then there will be no restrictions regardless of financial standing. You state that
like most automotive repair shops you will primarily operate on a “first come, first served” basis.

In your response regarding your fees, you state that all customers will pay for the parts that are needed because
it is a fixed cost incurred by you.

You assert you will advertise and reach out in multiple ways to ensure you touch everyone who will utilize the
auto repair shop. You will advertise through local radio stations and paid online advertisements. You also
maintain you will work with local agencies to reach low-income customers.

You state there are more than [redacted] for-profit auto repair shops in the same area that you will be operating. You
assert all the current shops in the area operate on the same type of fee system, but none offer any large
discounted rates. You declare that you plan to create a shop that is more trustworthy and helpful than the other
repair shops. You will cater to the same customers who are paying full price for their vehicle repairs.

You state any excess revenues will be used to grow your ability to help more families such as creating more
programs in your shop including educational classes for basic maintenance. You also assert you will use excess
revenues to try expanding into another location which will utilize your services.

Your website states that being a not-for-profit auto repair company gives you the unique ability to focus on your
customers unlike any other shop and that you offer affordable rates to all customers at a business you can trust.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K


Law:
Section 501(c)(3) of the Code provides for the recognition of exemption of organizations that are organized and
operated exclusively for religious, charitable or other purposes as specified in the statute. No part of the net
earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treasury. Regulation Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1)(i) provides that an organization is organized exclusively for
one or more exempt purposes only if its articles of organization limit its purposes to one or more exempt
purposes and do not expressly empower it to engage, otherwise than as an insubstantial part, in activities which
in themselves are not in furtherance of one or more exempt purposes.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(4) holds that an organization is not organized exclusively for one or more
exempt purposes unless its assets are dedicated to an exempt purpose. An organization's assets will be
considered dedicated to an exempt purpose, for example, if, upon dissolution, such assets would, by reason of a
provision in the organization's articles or operation of law, be distributed for one or more exempt purposes.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) provides that an organization will be regarded as operated exclusively
for one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish one or more of
such exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization will not be so regarded it
more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) defines the term “charitable” as including the relief of the poor and
distressed or of the underprivileged, and the promotion of social welfare by organizations designed to lessen
neighborhood tensions, to eliminate prejudice and discrimination, or to combat community deterioration. The
term “charitable” also includes lessening of the burdens of government.

Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(e)(1) provides that an organization may meet the requirements of Section
501(c)(3) of the Code although it operates a trade or business as a substantial part of its activities, if the
operation of such trade or business is in furtherance of the organization's exempt purpose or purposes and if the
organization is not organized or operated for the primary purposes of carrying on an unrelated trade or business.

In Rev. Rul. 73-127, 1973-1 C.B. 221, the Service held that an organization that operated a cut-price retail
grocery outlet and allocated a small portion of its earnings to provide on-the-job training to hard-core
unemployed did not qualify for exemption. The corporation was formed to operate a retail grocery store to sell
food to residents of a poverty area at prices substantially lower than those charged by competing grocery stores,
to provide free grocery delivery service to residents who need it, to participate in the Federal food stamp
program, and to provide job training for unemployed residents. The organization’s purpose of providing job
training for hard-core unemployed was charitable and educational within the meaning of the common law
concept of charity; however, the organization’s purpose of operating a retail grocery store, where food was sold
to residents of a poverty area at low prices, was not recognized as a charitable purpose under the basic common
law concept of charity. The ruling went on to say the operation of the store and the operation of the training
program are two distinct purposes, that was, ends or objects sought to be accomplished by the organization
through use of its resources; and since the former purpose was not a recognized charitable purpose, the
organization was not organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K

4

In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the Supreme Court

held that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy a claim for
exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes.

In Easter House v. U.S., 12 Cl. Ct. 476, 486 (1987), affd, 846 F. 2d 78 (Fed. Cir.) cert. denied, 488 U.S. 907-
(1988), the court found an organization that operated an adoption agency was not exempt under Section
501(c)(3) of the Code because a substantial purpose of the agency was a nonexempt commercial purpose. The
court concluded that the organization did not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) because its primary
activity was placing children for adoption in a manner indistinguishable from that of a commercial adoption
agency. The court found that the organization competed with for-profit adoption agencies, engaged in
substantial advertising, and accumulated substantial profits. Accordingly, the court found that the "business
purpose, and not the advancement of educational and charitable activities purpose, of plaintiff's adoption service
is its primary goal" and held that the organization was not operated exclusively for purposes described in
Section 501(c)(3).

In Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner, 950 F.2d 365 (7th Cir. 1991), the Court of Appeals upheld a Tax Court
decision that an organization operating restaurants and health food stores in a manner consistent with the
doctrines of the Seventh Day Adventist Church did not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Code because the organization was operated for a substantial nonexempt commercial purpose. The court found
that the organization's activities were "presumptively commercial" because the organization was in competition
with other restaurants, engaged in marketing, and generally operated in a manner similar to commercial
businesses.

In Airlie Foundation v. Commissioner, 283 F. Supp. 2d 58 (D.D.C., 2003), the court relied on the
“commerciality” doctrine in applying the operational test. Because of the commercial manner in which this
organization conducted its activities, the court found that it was operated for a non-exempt commercial purpose,
rather than for a tax-exempt purpose. As the court stated:

-Among the major factors courts have considered in assessing commerciality are
competition with for profit commercial entities; extent and degree of below cost
services provided; pricing policies; and reasonableness of financial reserves.
Additional factors include, inter alia, whether the organization uses commercial
promotional methods (e.g., advertising) and the extent to which the organization
receives charitable donations.-

In Asmark Institute, Inc. v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2011-20, aff'd, 486 Fed. Appx. 566 (6th Cir. 2012) the
appeals court upheld the Tax Court decision that the organization was not entitled to exemption under Section
501(c)(3) because its operations were commercial in nature rather than charitable. The court found that the
appellant’s largely fee-based business plan and its competition within a for-profit market were also strong
evidence of the predominance of their nonexempt commercial purposes. The court further held that the sale of
services is commonly considered to be a nonexempt commercial purpose.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K

Application of law

You are not operated for exempt purposes consistent with Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Your activities consist
of operating an automobile general repair and service shop. In addition, your website appears similar to that of a
for-profit auto repair shop. You operate in a manner consistent and in competition with other shops.

You do not meet the provisions stated in Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(1)(i) and 1.501(c)(3)-1(b)(4)
because your organizational document does not limit your purposes to one or more exempt purposes and your
dissolution does not ensure that your assets will be distributed for one or more exempt purposes described in
Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

You are not operating exclusively for charitable purposes as required under Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-
1(c)(1). Your primary activity is the operation of an automobile general repair and service shop providing
services to the general public. As provided in Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2), you have not established
that your operations accomplish exclusively charitable purposes.

You do not meet the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(e)(1) because your primary purpose is
the operation of an automobile general repair and service shop which is not in furtherance of exempt purposes.

You are similar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 73-127 that was found not to qualify for exemption
from income tax under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code as the purpose of its operating a retail grocery store,
where food is sold to residents of a poverty area at low prices, is not recognized as a charitable purpose under
the basic common law concept of charity and within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

As held in Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, a single non-exempt purpose, if

substantial, will preclude tax exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Your automobile general repair
and service operation, a substantial part of your activities, is a non-exempt purpose; therefore, you are not
operating exclusively for an exempt purpose as described in Section 501(c)(3).

You are like the organizations described in Easter House v. U.S., Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner, and
Asmark Institute, Inc. v. Commissioner because you are operating for a substantial nonexempt commercial
purpose rather than for a tax-exempt purpose. You are open to the general public during regular business hours
and provide the same services as for-profit competitors. Therefore, you conduct the activity in a manner similar
to for-profit businesses and are in direct competition with such businesses.

In Airlie Foundation v. Commissioner, the court applied a commerciality doctrine to assess the factors that were
more indicative of operating a business. These included a failure to provide services at substantially below cost,
pricing policies, competition with other non-exempt commercial entities, and use of commercial methods such
as advertising. Your customers, competitors, and scope of services strongly correlate with those of a
commercial enterprise.

Conclusion
Based on the information submitted, you have failed to establish that you are organized and operated
exclusively for exempt purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3) of the Code and the related income tax regulations. Therefore, based on the administrative record, you fail to qualify for exemption under Section
501(c)(3).

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K

6

If you agree

If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from
you within 30 days, we’ll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on
your income tax filing requirements.

If you don't agree
You have a right to protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, send us a
protest within 30 days of the date of this letter. You must include:

• Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone number
• A statement of the facts, law, and arguments supporting your position
• A statement indicating whether you are requesting an Appeals Office conference
• The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization or your authorized representative

The following declaration:

For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request, or this modification to the
request, including accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the request
or the modification contains all relevant facts relating to the request, and such facts are true, correct,
and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if they haven’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.

We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you gave us a basis to reconsider our determination. If so,
we’ll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t given us a basis
for reconsideration, we’ll send your case to the Appeals Office and notify you. You can find more information
in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-Exempt Status.

If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court later because the
law requires that you use the IRC administrative process first (IRC Section 7428(b)(2)).

Where to send your protest
Send your protest, Form 2848, if applicable, and any supporting documents to the applicable address:

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K


U.S. mail: Street address for delivery service:

Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service

EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Mail Stop 6403 550 Main Street, Mail Stop 6403

P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201

You can also fax your protest and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If you
fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that they received it.

You can get the forms and publications mentioned in this letter by visiting our website at www.irs.gov/forms-pubs or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676). If you have questions, you can contact the person listed at
the top of this letter.

Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Service

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS that can help protect your
taxpayer rights. TAS can offer you help if your tax problem is causing a hardship, or if you’ve tried but haven’t
been able to resolve your problem with the IRS. If you qualify for TAS assistance, which is always free, TAS
will do everything possible to help you. Visit www.taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov or call 877-777-4778.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

cc:

Letter 4034 (Rev. 11-2018)
Catalog Number 47628K

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2020, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.