S status restored after operating agreement created second stock class
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
An LLC had elected S corporation status, but its operating agreement retained partnership provisions and authorized profits interests with different liquidation rights. Issuing those interests caused the company to have more than one class of stock and terminated its S election. After discovering the problem, the company canceled the profits interests, amended the agreement to provide identical distribution and liquidation rights, and later merged into another entity. Because returns, distributions, and income allocations had consistently treated the company as an S corporation and the defect was inadvertent, the IRS restored S status for the affected period.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Did the second class of stock cause an inadvertent S election termination eligible for relief?
- Outcome: Approved; the company was treated as an S corporation throughout the specified pre-merger period.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362(f); Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l).
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201949009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/6/2019 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers:1362.00-00, 1362.02-00,
1362.04-00, 1361.00-00, Person To Contact:
1361.01-00, 1361.01-04 -----------------------, ID No. -------------------
---------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------
- Refer Reply To:
---------------------- CC:PSI:B3
------------------------------ PLR-110260-19
Date:
September 09, 2019Legend
X = ---------------
Y = ---------------------------
A = --------------------
B = ---------------------
State = -------------
Date 1 = --------------------
Date 2 = ---------------------------
Date 3 = ----------------------
Date 4 = ------------------------
Date 5 = --------------------
Date 6 = ------------------
Date 7 = ------------------
PLR-110260-19 2
Date 8 = -----------------------------
Date 9 = ----------------------------
Operating Agreement = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear -----------------:
This letter responds to a letter dated April 17, 2019, submitted on behalf of X by
its authorized representative, requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code).
Facts
The information submitted states that X was organized as a limited liability
company under the laws of State on Date 1. A and B were the members of X on Date
-
X elected to be an S corporation effective Date 2. On Date 3, X’s Operating
Agreement included provisions regarding partnerships. Section 4(j) of the Operating
Agreement provides, in part, that it is intended that X will be treated as a partnership for
federal income tax purposes and that each Member will be treated as a partner of a
partnership for tax purposes. Section 4(a) provides, in part, that X shall have two (2)
classes of Units: Class A Units and Profits Units. Sections, 4, 8, and 19 of the Operating
Agreement state that a Profits Interest only shares in liquidation proceeds due to profits
earned after the issuance of the Profit Unit. On Date 4 and Date 5, X issued Profits
Interests.When X’s shareholders discovered the effect of the partnership provisions and
the issuance of the Profits Interests, X canceled the Profits Interests between Date 6
and Date 7. X amended its operating agreement on Date 8 to remove the partnership
provisions and the Profits Interest provisions and to provide identical distribution and
liquidation rights to X’s shareholders. On Date 9, X merged into Y, with Y surviving the
merger, in a transaction intending to qualify as a reorganization described in
§ 368(a)(1)(F), in accordance with Income Tax Regulation §§ 1.368-2(m)(3)(i) and
1.368-2(m)(4).X represents that the termination of X’s S corporation election was inadvertentand not the result of retroactive tax planning. X further represents that no federal tax
return of any person has been filed inconsistent with a valid S corporation election
having been made for X effective Date 2. X also represents that all distributions and
allocations of income to its shareholders have been made pro rata in accordance with
their interests in X. X and X’s shareholders have agreed to make any adjustments
required by the Service consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation.
PLR-110260-19 3Law and Analysis Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect toany taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is
in effect for such year.Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic
corporation which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a
shareholder a person (other than an estate, a trust described in § 1361(c)(2), or an
organization described in § 1361(c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident
alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than one class of stock.Section 1362(a)(1) provides that, except as provided in § 1362(g), a small
business corporation may elect, in accordance with the provisions of § 1362, to be an S
corporation.Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) is terminatedwhenever (at any time on or after the first day of the first taxable year for which the
corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business
corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) provides that any termination under § 1362(d)(2)(A)
is effective on and after the date of cessation.Section 1362(f) provides that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) or§ 1361(b)(3)(B)(ii) by any corporation (i) was not effective for the taxable year for which
made (determined without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the
requirements of § 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents, or (ii) was terminated
under § 1362(d)(2) or (3) or § 1361(b)(3)(C); (2) the Secretary determines that the
circumstances resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent; (3) no
later than a reasonable period of time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in
such ineffectiveness or termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which
the election was made or the termination occurred is a small business corporation or a
QSub, as the case may be, or to acquire the required shareholder consents; and (4) the
corporation for which the election was made or the termination occurred, and each
person who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified
pursuant to § 1362(f), agree to make the adjustments (consistent with the treatment of
the corporation as an S corporation or a QSub, as the case may be) as may be required
by the Secretary with respect to this period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances
resulting in such ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation shall be treated as an S
corporation or a QSub, as the case may be, during the period specified by the
Secretary.
PLR-110260-19 4Section 1.1361-1(l)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that a
corporation is generally treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding
shares of stock of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation
proceeds.Section 1.1361-1(l)(2)(i) provides that the determination of whether all
outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation
proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws,
applicable state laws, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation
proceeds (collectively, governing provisions).ConclusionBased solely on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that
X’s S corporation election terminated on Date 3 because X had more than one class of
stock due to the provisions in the Operating Agreement. We also conclude that the
termination of X’s S corporation was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f).
Accordingly, under the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as an S corporation
from Date 3 until Date 9, provided that X’s S corporation election was otherwise valid
and not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).Except as specifically ruled above, we express or imply no opinion concerning
the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of
the Code, including whether X was otherwise a valid S corporation. We also express no
opinion on whether X’s merger into Y qualifies as a § 368(a)(1)(F) reorganization.This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited for precedent.Pursuant to a power of attorney on file, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s
authorized representative.
PLR-110260-19 5The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the rulings requested, it is subject to verification on
examination.Sincerely, Richard T. Probst Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3 Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures (2):
Copy of this letter
Copy for §6110 purposes
cc:
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.