Surviving spouse could roll estate-beneficiary plan assets into an IRA
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A participant in a governmental section 457(b) plan named his estate, rather than his spouse, as the beneficiary of his account. His surviving spouse was both the executrix and sole beneficiary of the residual estate, but the plan recordkeeper rejected her proposed rollover because the estate was the named beneficiary. The IRS ruled that the spouse could be treated as receiving the distribution directly from the participant for section 402(c) purposes. She could therefore make a direct rollover to an IRA in her own name, and the properly rolled amount would not be included in her gross income.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: May a surviving spouse roll a deceased participant's section 457(b) account into her IRA when his estate was the named beneficiary?
- Outcome: approved, the spouse could be treated as the distributee and complete a tax-free rollover
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 402(c)(9), 408, and 457(e)(16)
Full text (IRS public release)
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224
Number: 201936009 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 9/6/2019 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 402.00-00, 402.01-00,
402.08-00, 402.08-05 Person To Contact:
-------------------, ID No. -----------------
------------------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------------------------ ---------------------
-- Refer Reply To:
------------------------------ CC:EEE:EB:QP4
------------------------------------ PLR-135169-18
In Re: ---------------------------------------------------- Date:
---------------------------------------- May 29, 2019
Legend
Decedent = ---------------------------
Plan = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------
State = ------------------
Taxpayer = -------------------------------
Dear ------------------:
This letter responds to your authorized representative's letter dated November 21, 2018,
and supplemental correspondence received on April 24, 2019, requesting a ruling
concerning your ability to roll over a distribution of your deceased spouse's account in
the Plan into your individual retirement account, despite his account naming his estate
as the beneficiary.
The following facts and representations have been submitted under penalties of perjury
in support of your request:
Decedent was a participant in the Plan, and died before reaching age 70-1/2. You have
submitted the Plan Document stating that the Plan was established by State under
§ 457(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. You have also submitted documentation stating
that, prior to Decedent’s death, he named his estate as the sole beneficiary of his
account in the Plan. Taxpayer is Decedent’s surviving spouse and is the executrix and
sole beneficiary of his residual estate. Taxpayer states that no distributions have been
made from Decedent’s Plan account since Decedent’s death.
PLR-135169-18 2
Following Decedent’s death, Taxpayer, as executrix and sole beneficiary of Decedent’s
residual estate (which included Decedent’s Plan account), sought to roll over
Decedent’s account in the Plan to an IRA established and maintained in Taxpayer’s
name. However, the recordkeeper for the Plan disallowed the rollover because
Decedent’s estate, and not Taxpayer, was the named beneficiary of Decedent’s account
in the Plan.
You request the following rulings:
1. Taxpayer, the surviving spouse of Decedent, will be treated as having acquired any
distribution from the Plan directly from the Decedent, and not the Decedent’s estate.
2. Taxpayer is eligible to roll over distributions from the Plan to an IRA established and
maintained in her name to the extent permitted by § 402(c)(9).
3. Taxpayer will not be required to include any amounts properly rolled over in her gross
income for federal tax purposes for the calendar year in which the distribution and
rollover occurred.
Section 457(b) defines an eligible deferred compensation plan as a plan established
and maintained by an eligible employer that meets the requirements specified in such
section.
Section 457(e)(1)(A) defines the term “eligible employer” as (A) a state, political
subdivision of a state, and any agency or instrumentality of a state or political
subdivision of a state.
Section 457(e)(16)(A) provides that in the case of an eligible deferred compensation
plan established and maintained by an employer described in subsection (e)(1)(A), if
any portion of the balance to the credit of an employee in such plan is paid to such
employee in an eligible rollover distribution (within the meaning of § 402(c)(4)), the
employee transfers any portion of the property such employee receives in such
distribution to an eligible retirement plan described in § 402(c)(8)(B), and, in the case of
a distribution of property other than money, the amount so transferred consists of the
property distributed, then such distribution (to the extent so transferred) shall not be
includible in gross income for the taxable year in which paid.
Section 457(e)(16)(B) provides that the rules of paragraphs (2) through (7), (9), and (11)
of § 402(c) and § 402(f) shall apply for purposes of subparagraph (A).
Section 402(c)(2) provides that the maximum amount of an eligible rollover distribution
shall not exceed the portion of such distribution which is otherwise includible in gross
income, provided that such limitation does not apply to (1) amounts transferred in a
direct trustee-to-trustee transfer to a qualified trust or an annuity contract described in
PLR-135169-18 3
§ 403(b) that meets certain conditions; or (2) amounts transferred to an eligible
retirement plan described in clause (i) or (ii) of § 402(c)(8)(B).
Section 402(c)(3) provides that the exclusion from gross income shall not apply to any
transfer of a distribution made after the 60th day following the day on which the
distributee received the property distributed.
Section 402(c)(4) defines “eligible rollover distribution” as any distribution to an
employee of all or a portion of the balance to the credit of an employee in a qualified
trust; except that the terms shall not include-
(A) any distribution which is one of a series of substantially equal periodic payments
(not less frequently than annually) made for the life (or life expectancies or the joint life
expectancies) of the employee and the employee’s designated beneficiary, or for a
period of 10 years or more,
(B) any distribution to the extent the distribution is required under § 401(a)(9), and
(C) any distribution which is made upon hardship of the employee.
Section 402(c)(8)(B) defines eligible retirement plan as (i) an individual retirement
account described in § 408(a), (ii) an individual retirement annuity described in § 408(b)
(other than an endowment contract), (iii) a § 401(a) qualified retirement plan, (iv) an
annuity plan described in § 403(a), (v) an eligible deferred compensation plan described
in § 457(b) which is maintained by an eligible employer described in § 457(e)(1)(A), and
(vi) an annuity contract described in § 403(b).
Section 402(c)(9) provides that if a distribution attributable to an employee is paid to the
spouse of the employee after the employee’s death, § 402(c) will apply to such
distribution in the same manner as if the spouse were the employee.
In this case, Decedent’s estate is the beneficiary of his account in the Plan. Taxpayer,
Decedent’s surviving spouse, is the executrix and sole beneficiary of Decedent’s
residual estate. Taxpayer proposes to roll over Decedent’s balance in the Plan to an
IRA established and maintained in her name via direct rollover. Under these
circumstances, Decedent’s account under the Plan may be treated as paid from the
Plan to the Decedent’s spouse for purposes of § 402(c).
Accordingly, we conclude that:
1. Taxpayer may be treated as having received the distribution from the Plan for
purposes of § 402(c);
PLR-135169-18 4
2. Taxpayer is eligible to roll over the distribution from the Plan to an IRA established
and maintained in her name; and
3. Taxpayer will not be required to include the amount distributed in her gross income
for federal tax purposes for the calendar year in which the distribution and rollover
occur.
The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party, as specified in Rev. Proc. 2019-1, 2019-1 I.R.B. 1,
§ 7.01(16)(b). This office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the
request for ruling, and such material is subject to verification on examination. The
Associate office will revoke or modify a letter ruling and apply the revocation
retroactively if there has been a misstatement or omission of controlling facts; the facts
at the time of the transaction are materially different from the controlling facts on which
the ruling was based; or, in the case of a transaction involving a continuing action or
series of actions, the controlling facts change during the course of the transaction. See
Rev. Proc. 2019-1, § 11.05.
This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.
A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.
Sincerely,
Jason Levine
Senior Technician Reviewer
Qualified Plans Branch 4
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations,
and Employment Taxes)
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.