Private Letter Ruling 201933002 Released August 16, 2019 Approved

Partnership received extension for section 754 election

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited liability company taxed as a partnership failed to make a timely section 754 election for the year in which ownership interests were transferred. The company represented that it acted reasonably and in good faith, that relief would not prejudice the government, and that it was not using hindsight. The IRS granted 120 days to file the election. Relief required the company and its partners to make all basis, depreciation, and return adjustments that would have applied if the election had been timely, including adjustments for otherwise closed years.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the partnership receive additional time to make a section 754 basis-adjustment election?
  • Outcome: approved, with 120 days to file and with required retroactive basis and depreciation adjustments
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1, 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                    Department of the Treasury
                                                            Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201933002                                           [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 8/16/2019                                     Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 754.00-00, 754.02-00,
              9100.00-00, 9100.15-00                        Person To Contact:
                                                            -----------------, ID No. -----------
---------------------------------------------               Telephone Number:
-----------------------------                               ----------------------
--------------                                              Refer Reply To:
------------------------------                              CC:PSI:01
                                                            PLR-128221-18
                                                            Date:
                                                            April 25, 2019




Legend

Company            = ------------------------------------------------------
                     --------------------------

State              = --------------

A                  = -----------------------------
                     ----------------------------

a                  = ----

Year               = -------

Date1              = ---------------------------



Dear -----------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated September 18, 2018, submitted on behalf of
Company by its authorized representative, requesting an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under
§ 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”).
PLR-128221-18                                 2

FACTS

The information submitted states that Company is a State limited liability company that
was formed on or around Date1 and is classified as a partnership for federal tax
purposes. A owned a percent of the interests in Company.

During Year, interests in Company were transferred. Company inadvertently failed to file
a timely election under § 754 for Year.

Company represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief
will not prejudice the interests of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in
making the election.

LAW

Section 754 provides, in part, that if a partnership files an election, in accordance with
the regulations prescribed by the Secretary, the basis of partnership property is
adjusted, in the case of a distribution of property, in the manner provided in § 734, and,
in the case of a transfer of a partnership interest, in the manner provided in § 743. Such
an election shall apply with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and
to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to
which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations provides, in part, that an election
under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b) with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, shall be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid,
the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including
extensions thereof) for filing the return for the taxable year.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner may grant a reasonable
extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than
6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term “regulatory
election” as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the
Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement
published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will
use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section
301.9100-2 provides the rules governing automatic extensions of time for making
certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards the Commissioner will use
PLR-128221-18                                3

to determine whether to grant an extension of time for regulatory elections that do not
meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Under § 301.9100-3, a request for relief will be granted when the taxpayer provides the
evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the
satisfaction of the Commissioner that (1) the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good
faith, and (2) the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, we conclude
that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a
result, Company is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter
to make an election under § 754 effective for its Year taxable year and thereafter. The
election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center
for association with Company's Year return. A copy of this letter should be attached to
the statement filed.

This ruling is contingent on Company filing all required returns and adjusting the basis
of its properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been
made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect
any additional depreciation that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had
been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation on
assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of
late relief. Any depreciation deduction allowable for an open year is to be computed
based upon the remaining useful life and using property basis as adjusted by the
greater of any depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in any prior year had the
§ 754 election been timely made. Additionally, the partners of Company must adjust the
basis of their interests in Company to reflect what that basis would be if the § 754
election had been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation
on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant
of late relief. Specifically, the partners of Company must reduce the basis of their
interests in Company in the amount of any additional depreciation that would have been
allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the
tax consequences of any facts discussed or referenced in this letter. Specifically, we
express no opinion as to whether Company is a partnership for federal tax purposes.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
PLR-128221-18                                4

by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of
this letter ruling to your authorized representative.


                                      Sincerely,

                                      HOLLY PORTER
                                      Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs & Special Industries)




                                         Wendy L Kribell
                                      By Wendy L. Kribell
                                      Senior Counsel, Branch 3
                                      Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                      (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



Enclosures: Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for § 6110 purposes



cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.