Pension plan received five-year substitute mortality table approval

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer requested substitute mortality tables for the male and female annuitants of one pension plan. The IRS approved the tables for five plan years, excluding disabled participants, after finding that the rates were developed under Treasury Regulation section 1.430(h)(3)-2 and Revenue Procedure 2017-55. Male and female nonannuitants lacked credible mortality experience and had to continue using standard tables, while disabled participants remained subject to the Revenue Ruling 96-7 mortality tables. The approved rates had to be applied generationally and could terminate early if the letter's credibility, controlled-group, coverage-change, predictive-accuracy, or replacement-table conditions occurred.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the plan use substitute mortality tables for male and female annuitants other than disabled participants?
• Outcome: Approved for five plan years; nonannuitants and disabled participants remained on the specified standard tables.
• Key authorities: IRC § 430(h)(3); ERISA § 303(h)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.430(h)(3)-1 and 1.430(h)(3)-2; Rev. Proc. 2017-55; Rev. Rul. 96-7

Full text (IRS public release)

Significant Index No. 0430.00-00

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

TAX EXEMPT AND
GOVERNMENT ENTITIES
DIVISION

APR 16 2019

T:EP:RA:A2

Re: Substitute Mortality Table Ruling

Taxpayer = [redacted]
EIN: [redacted]

Plan = [redacted]
EIN: [redacted] (Plan No. [redacted])

Plan populations for which substitute mortality tables are requested:

• Male annuitants
• Female annuitants

Other Plan populations in controlled group:

• Male nonannuitants
• Female nonannuitants
• Disabled participants

Dear Mr. [redacted]:

This letter is to inform you that your request to use substitute mortality tables for making
computations under section 430 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) for the Plan
has been granted with respect to the populations specified in this letter, effective for a
period of 5 plan years beginning with the plan year commencing January 1, [redacted]. Your
request has been granted in accordance with section 430(h)(3) of the Code and section
303(h)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.

This approval applies to the following specific populations:

• Male annuitants (excluding disabled participants)
• Female annuitants (excluding disabled participants)

Based on the information provided by the Taxpayer, the following Plan populations do
not have credible mortality experience, and therefore the standard mortality tables will
be used for calculations under section 430 of the Code:

• Male nonannuitants
• Female nonannuitants

Revenue Ruling 96-7 mortality tables will be used for disabled participants.

In granting this approval, we have only considered whether the substitute mortality rates
were developed in accordance with section 1.430(h)(3)-2 of the Treasury Regulations
(“Regulations”) and Revenue Procedure 2017-55. Accordingly, we are not expressing
any opinion as to the accuracy or acceptability of any calculations or other material
submitted with your request.

Permission is hereby granted to use the substitute mortality rates shown in the table
below for the Plan:

Substitute Mortality Tables
Approved for use beginning with the plan year commencing January 1, [redacted]
Base year [redacted]

Age   Male Annuitants   Female Annuitants
[The scanned table lists ages 1 through 120. All male and female annuitant mortality-rate values were redacted in the IRS release. -- transcriber]

The above rates were developed based on an experience study period from January 1,
[redacted] through December 31, [redacted], with a base year of [redacted]. The rates were calculated
by adjusting the applicable standard mortality tables in section 1.430(h)(3)-1(d) of the
Regulations using the mortality ratio and credibility weighting factor, determined by
aggregating male and female experience, as shown in the table below.

Annuitants
Mortality ratio   [redacted]
Credibility weighting factor   [redacted]

The Internal Revenue Service has reviewed the substitute mortality rates and
supporting information, and has determined that based on the information submitted,
the rates were developed in accordance with section 1.430(h)(3)-2 of the Regulations
and Revenue Procedure 2017-55.

The above rates must be applied on a generational basis, as provided in section
1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(3) of the Regulations.

Your attention is called to section 430(h)(3)(C)(ii) of the Code and section 1.430(h)(3)-
2(d)(6) of the Regulations, which describe the circumstances in which the use of the
substitute mortality table will terminate before the end of the 5-year period described
above. In general, the substitute mortality tables can no longer be used as of the
earliest of:

(1) For a plan using a substitute mortality table for only one gender, the first plan
year for which there is full or partial credible mortality information with respect to
the other gender that had lacked credible mortality information (unless an
approved substitute mortality table is used for that gender),

(2) The first plan year in which the plan fails to satisfy the requirements of section
1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(1) of the Regulations, regarding the requirement that other
plans and populations in the controlled group must also use substitute mortality
tables unless it can be demonstrated that they do not have credible mortality
information (taking into account the transition period for newly affiliated
companies in section 1.430(h)(3)-2(f)(3) of the Regulations),

(3) The second plan year following the plan year for which there is a significant
change in individuals covered by the plan as described in section
1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(6)(iii) of the Regulations,

(4) The plan year following the plan year in which a substitute mortality table used
for a plan population is no longer accurately predictive of future mortality of that
population, as determined by the Commissioner or as certified by the Plan’s
actuary to the satisfaction of the Commissioner, or

(5) The date specified in guidance published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
pursuant to a replacement of mortality tables specified under section
430(h)(3)(A) of the Code and section 1.430(h)(3)-1 of the Regulations, other
than annual updates to the static mortality tables issued pursuant to section
1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(3) of the Regulations or changes to the mortality improvement
rates pursuant to section 1.430(h)(3)-1(a)(2)(i)(C) of the Regulations.

In particular, section 1.430(h)(3)-2(c)(6)(iii) provides that the use of substitute mortality
tables must be discontinued after a significant change in coverage unless the plan’s
actuary certifies in writing to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the substitute
mortality tables used for the population continue to be accurately predictive of future
mortality of the population (taking into account the effect of the change in the
population). For this purpose, a significant change in coverage occurs if the number of
individuals covered by the substitute mortality table for a plan year is less than 80
percent or more than 120 percent of either (1) the average number of individuals in that
population over the years covered by the experience study on which the substitute
mortality table is based, or (2) the number of individuals covered by the substitute
mortality table in a plan year for which a certification described in section 1.430(h)(3)-
2(6)(c)(iii)(A) of the Regulations was made.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited by others as precedent.

When filing Form 5500 for the plan years for which the substitute mortality tables are
used, please note the information that is required to be attached to Schedule SB
(Actuarial Information) in accordance with the instructions to that form.

We have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representative pursuant to a power
of attorney on file in this office and to the Manager, EP Classification in Columbus, Ohio
and to the Manager, EP Compliance Unit in Chicago, Illinois.

If you require further assistance in this matter, please contact [redacted]
(ID# [redacted]) at ([redacted]) [redacted].

Sincerely,

David M. Ziegler, Manager
Employee Plans Actuarial Group 2

cc: