Private Letter Ruling 201927001 Released July 5, 2019 Approved

VEBA surplus may fund current employee medical benefits

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An employer maintained two voluntary employees' beneficiary association trusts holding assets for retiree medical benefits, one for non-bargaining employees and one for bargaining employees. Both trusts had assets far above their projected retiree-medical liabilities, and the employer proposed amending them so specified assets could also pay current medical benefits for active non-bargaining employees. The employer represented that the assets would remain exclusively for participants and beneficiaries and that it would include the affected amounts in income under the tax benefit rule. The IRS ruled that the amendments and benefit payments would not create a disqualified benefit or section 4976 excise tax because no assets reverted to the employer. Amounts included in income could be treated as new section 419 contributions and deducted to the extent sections 419 and 419A allowed, but not beyond the amount included in income.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could an employer redirect excess VEBA assets from retiree medical benefits to current employee medical benefits without a disqualified-benefit excise tax, and then deduct amounts included under the tax benefit rule?
  • Outcome: Approved, subject to income inclusion under the tax benefit rule and the normal section 419 and 419A deduction limits.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 61, 111, 419, 419A, and 4976; Treas. Reg. § 1.419A-2T

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201927001                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 7/5/2019                                         Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 4976.01-00, 419.00-00,
              111.00-00                                        Person To Contact:
                                                               --------------------
------------------------------------------------------------   Telephone Number:
---------                                                      --------------------
--------------------------                                     Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------                       CC:EEE:EB:HW
--------------------------                                     PLR-116667-18

                                                               Date:
                                                               March 28, 2019




Legend:

Taxpayer = --------------------------

Trust A = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------

Trust B = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan A = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----

Plan B = -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Plan C = -------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = --------------------

Date 2 = ---------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------------

$A = --------------

$B = --------------

$C = --------------

$D = --------------
PLR-116667-18                                2

Year 1 =-------

Year 2 = ------

Year 3 =-------

Dear --------------:

This responds to your representative’s letter, dated May 14, 2018, and later
correspondence, requesting a ruling regarding the tax consequences under sections
419, and 419A, and 4976 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) of amendments to
Trust A and Trust B. As described in greater detail below, the amendments would allow
certain assets in Trust A and Trust B, to which Taxpayer contributed in order to provide
postretirement medical benefits for Taxpayer’s employees, to be used to provide current
medical benefits for Taxpayer’s employees.

FACTS

Taxpayer sponsors Trust A, which was established on Date 1 and holds assets that are
used to provide postretirement medical benefits under Plan A for Taxpayer’s retired,
non-bargaining unit employees. Trust A received a determination letter, dated Date 2,
stating that it is a voluntary employees’ beneficiary association (“VEBA”) under section
501(c)(9). Taxpayer represents that it contributed $A to Trust A between Year 1 and
Year 2 and deducted the contributions in accordance with sections 419 and 419A,
including section 419A(c)(2). Trust A holds $B as of Date 3. $B is more than $A.
Taxpayer represents that current assets in Trust A greatly exceed the actuarial liability
for postretirement medical benefits under Plan A for Taxpayer’s retired, non-bargaining
unit employees.1

Taxpayer also sponsors Trust B, which was established on Date 1 and holds assets that
are used to provide postretirement medical benefits under Plan A for Taxpayer’s retired,
bargaining unit employees. Trust B received a determination letter, dated Date 2, stating
that it is a VEBA under section 501(c)(9). Taxpayer represents that, at all times since its
establishment, Trust B has been a separate welfare benefit fund under a collective
bargaining agreement within the meaning of section 419A(f)(5) and section 1.419A-2T
of the Income Tax Regulations (“Regulations”). Taxpayer represents that it contributed
approximately $C to Trust B between Year 1 and Year 2 and deducted the contributions

1
 The assets in Trust A greatly exceed the actuarial liability for postretirement medical
benefits under Plan A for Taxpayer’s retired, non-bargaining unit employees due to
Taxpayer’s large initial contributions, a large settlement gain resulting from freezing
benefits under Plan A, increased cost-shifting to participants, lower participation, and
changes to the design of Plan A.
PLR-116667-18                                 3

in accordance with sections 419 and 419A, including section 419A(f)(5). Trust B holds
$D as of Date 3. $C is more than $D. Taxpayer represents that current assets in Trust B
greatly exceed the actuarial liability for postretirement medical benefits under Plan A for
Taxpayer’s retired, bargaining unit employees.2

Plan B provides medical benefits for Taxpayer’s active, non-bargaining and bargaining
unit employees. Taxpayer currently funds benefits provided under Plan B from its
general assets. Plan A and Plan B will be merged to form Plan C in Year 3. Plan C will
provide: (1) postretirement medical benefits for Taxpayer’s retired, non-bargaining and
bargaining unit employees, and (2) medical benefits for Taxpayer’s active, non-
bargaining and bargaining unit employees. Following the merger, Taxpayer will amend
Trust A in Year 3 to permit, as of the effective date of the amendment, $A of the assets
in Trust A to be used to provide: (1) postretirement medical benefits for Taxpayer’s
retired, non-bargaining unit employees under Plan C, and (2) medical benefits for
Taxpayer’s active, non-bargaining unit employees under Plan C. Taxpayer also will
amend Trust B in Year 3 to permit the value of assets in Trust B to be used to provide:
(1) postretirement medical benefits for Taxpayer’s retired, bargaining unit employees
under Plan C, and (2) medical benefits for Taxpayer’s active, non-bargaining unit
employees under Plan C.

Trust A and Trust B each provide that no amendment may be made that would cause
any part of the income or corpus of the trust fund to be used for or diverted to purposes
other than for the exclusive benefit of the participants or their eligible beneficiaries.
Taxpayer represents that all amounts in Trust A and Trust B will at all times continue to
be held for the exclusive benefit of the participants and beneficiaries of Trust A and
Trust B, as applicable. Taxpayer further represents that the proposed amendments to
Trust A and Trust B will be effective prospectively and will apply only with respect to
active, non-bargaining unit employee medical benefits incurred on or after the effective
date of the amendments to Trust A and Trust B (i.e., the amendments to Trust A and
Trust B will only apply with respect to medical benefits newly payable on a prospective
basis after the effective date of the amendments).

Taxpayer represents that its taxable year is the calendar year. With respect to Trust A,
Taxpayer represents that it will include $A in gross income in Year 3 under the tax
benefit rule. With respect to Trust B, Taxpayer represents that it will include the value of
assets in Trust B on the effective date of the amendment in gross income in Year 3
under the tax benefit rule, Taxpayer represents that no portion of the tax benefit income

2
 The assets in Trust B greatly exceed the actuarial liability for postretirement medical
benefits under Plan A for Taxpayer’s retired, bargaining unit employees due to
Taxpayer’s large initial contributions, a large settlement gain resulting from freezing
benefits under Plan A, increased cost-shifting to participants, lower participation, and
changes to the design of Plan A.
PLR-116667-18                                 4

with respect to the assets in Trust A or Trust B is excludable under the exclusionary part
of the tax benefit rule.

Taxpayer represents that (a) Contributions have been made to Trust A and Trust B by
retired employees, and the disbursements under each plan have exceeded the retired
employee contributions to each respective trust on an annual basis; (b) no active
employee contributions have been made to Trust A or Trust B; (c) the assets in Trust A
to be used for medical benefits for active, non-bargaining unit employees will be limited
to $A (d) the assets in Trust B to be used for medical benefits for active, non-bargaining
unit employees will not be limited; and (e) neither Trust A nor Trust B have at any time
since their establishment received a transfer of assets from another VEBA or another
welfare benefit fund.

RULINGS REQUESTED

Taxpayer requests the following rulings:

Ruling Request 1: The amendment of Trust A and the use of Trust A assets to provide
medical benefits to active, non-bargaining unit employees will not be treated as a
disqualified benefit under section 4976(b)(1)(C), and will not, in and of itself, result in
excise tax under section 4976.

Ruling Request 2: The amendment of Trust B and the use of Trust B assets to provide
medical benefits to active, non-bargaining unit employees will not be treated as a
disqualified benefit under section 4976(b)(1)(C), and will not, in and of itself, result in
excise tax under section 4976.

Ruling Request 3: The amount of Trust A assets that will be used to provide medical
benefits for active, non-bargaining unit employees under Plan C, and that will be
included in Taxpayer’s gross income in the tax year in which the Trust A amendment is
effective, will be treated as a contribution (within the meaning of section 419(a)) to Trust
A in that tax year, and Taxpayer will be permitted to take deductions with respect to
such Trust A contributions used for medical benefits under Plan C for active, non-
bargaining unit employees to the extent permitted by sections 419 and 419A.

Ruling Request 4: The amount of Trust B assets that will be used to provide medical
benefits for active, non-bargaining unit employees under Plan C, and that will be
included in Taxpayer’s gross income in the tax year in which the Trust B amendment is
effective, will be treated as a contribution (within the meaning of section 419(a)) to Trust
B in that tax year, and Taxpayer will be permitted to take deductions with respect to
such Trust B contributions used for medical benefits under Plan C for active, non-
bargaining unit employees to the extent permitted by sections 419 and 419A.

LAW
PLR-116667-18                                 5


Section 61(a) of the Code provides that, unless otherwise excepted, gross income
includes all income from whatever source derived.

Section 111(a) provides that gross income does not include income attributable to the
recovery during the taxable year of any amount deducted in any prior taxable year to
the extent that the amount did not reduce the amount of tax imposed by Chapter 1 of
the Code.

Generally, the tax benefit rule requires a taxpayer who received a tax benefit from a
deduction in an earlier year to recognize income in a later year if an event occurs that is
fundamentally inconsistent with the premise on which the deduction was initially based.
Hillsboro National Bank v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 370 (1983); see also Hughes &
Luce, LLP v. Commissioner, 70 F.3d 16 (5th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1208
(1996). The term “tax benefit rule” encompasses two concepts, an inclusionary part and
an exclusionary part. Frederick v. Commissioner, 101 T.C. 35, 40-41 (1993). The
inclusionary part has been developed in the courts and requires a taxpayer to include a
previously deducted amount in the current year’s income when a fundamentally
inconsistent event has occurred. The exclusionary part is partially codified at section
111(a) and permits a taxpayer to exclude an amount that did not previously provide a
tax benefit when it was deducted; the exclusionary part cannot apply unless the
inclusionary part applies.

The tax benefit rule allays some of the inflexibilities of the annual accounting system
under specific circumstances. Hillsboro National Bank, 460 U.S. at 377. The general
purpose of the tax benefit rules is to approximate the results produced by a tax system
based on transactional rather than annual accounting. Id. at 381. The tax benefit rule
will “cancel out” an earlier deduction when a later event is “fundamentally inconsistent”
with the premise on which the deduction was initially based, even in situations where
there is no actual recovery of funds. Id. at 381-383. One must consider the facts and
circumstances of each case in light of the purpose and function of the provisions
granting the deductions. Id. at 385. Although it is usually helpful to determine whether
the later event would have foreclosed the deduction if it had occurred within the same
tax year, that inquiry is not an exclusive test. See American Mutual Life Insurance Co. v.
United States, 267 F.3d 1344, 1350 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

Section 419(a) provides that contributions paid or accrued by an employer to a welfare
benefit fund are not deductible under Chapter 1, but if they would otherwise be
deductible, are (subject to the limitation of section 419(b)) deductible under section 419
for the taxable year in which paid.

Section 419(b) limits the employer's deduction under section 419(a) to a welfare benefit
fund's qualified cost for the taxable year. The qualified cost of a welfare benefit fund for
a taxable year is defined in section 419(c)(1) as the sum of the qualified direct cost for
PLR-116667-18                                6

the taxable year and, subject to the limitation of section 419A(b), any addition to a
qualified asset account for the taxable year. Under section 419(c)(2), the qualified cost
for any taxable year is reduced by the welfare benefit fund's after-tax income for the
taxable year.

Section 419(c)(3)(A) provides that the term “qualified direct cost” means, with respect to
any taxable year, the aggregate amount (including administrative expenses) that would
have been allowable as a deduction to the employer with respect to the benefits
provided during the taxable year, if those benefits were provided directly by the
employer and the employer used the cash receipts and disbursements method of
accounting.

Section 419(c)(3)(B) provides that, for purposes of section 419(c)(3)(A), a benefit is
treated as provided when that benefit would be includible in the gross income of the
employee if provided directly by the employer (or would be so includible but for any
provision of Chapter 1 of the Code excluding that benefit from gross income).

Section 419(e)(1) defines the term “welfare benefit fund” to include any fund through
which the employer provides welfare benefits to employees or their beneficiaries. The
term “fund” is defined in section 419(e)(3) to include an organization described in
section 501(c)(9).

Section 419A(a) defines the term “qualified asset account” to include any account
consisting of assets set aside to provide for the payment of medical benefits.

Section 419A(b) provides that no addition to any qualified asset account may be taken
into account under section 419(c)(1)(B) to the extent the addition results in the amount
of the account exceeding the account limit.

Section 419A(c)(1) provides that, except as otherwise provided in this subsection, the
account limit for any qualified asset account for any taxable year is the amount
reasonably and actuarially necessary to fund (A) claims incurred but unpaid (as of the
close of the taxable year) for benefits referred to in subsection (a), and (B)
administrative costs with respect to the claims.

Section 419A(c)(2)(A) provides that the account limit for any taxable year may include a
reserve funded over the working lives of the covered employees and actuarially
determined on a level basis (using assumptions that are reasonable in the aggregate)
as necessary for post-retirement medical benefits to be provided to covered employees
(determined on the basis of current medical costs).

Section 419A(f)(5)(A) provides that no account limits shall apply in the case of any
qualified asset account under a separate welfare benefit fund under a collective
bargaining agreement.
PLR-116667-18                                  7


Section 1.419A-2T, Q&A-1, of the Regulations provides that contributions to a welfare
benefit fund maintained pursuant to one or more collective bargaining agreements and
the reserves of such a fund generally are subject to the rules of sections 419, 419A, and
512 of the Code. However, neither contributions to nor reserves of such a collectively
bargained welfare benefit fund shall be treated as exceeding the otherwise applicable
limits of section 419(b), 419A(b), or 512(a)(3)(E) until the earlier of: (i) the date on which
the last of the collective bargaining agreements relating to the fund in effect on, or
ratified on or before, the date of issuance of final regulations concerning such limits for
collectively bargained welfare benefit funds terminates (determined without regard to
any extension thereof agreed to after the date of issuance of such final regulations), or
(ii) the date 3 years after the issuance of such final regulations.

Section 4976(a) imposes a 100 percent excise tax if an employer maintains a welfare
benefit fund and there is a disqualified benefit provided during any taxable year.

Section 4976(b)(1)(C) defines the term “disqualified benefit” to include any portion of a
welfare benefit fund reverting to the benefit of the employer.

ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS

Tax Benefit Rule: As explained above, the tax benefit rule is implicated when a
taxpayer has taken a deduction in a prior year, and in a subsequent year an event
occurs that is fundamentally inconsistent with the premise of the deduction. Taxpayer
made contributions to Trust A for the purpose of providing postretirement medical
benefits for Taxpayer’s retired, non-bargaining unit employees. Taxpayer deducted the
contributions in accordance with sections 419 and 419A, including section 419A(c)(2).
The proposed amendment to Trust A will allow, as of the effective date of the
amendment, $A of the assets in Trust A to be used to provide medical benefits to
Taxpayer’s active, non-bargaining unit employees. This use is fundamentally
inconsistent with the premise of the previously taken deductions. The amendment of
Trust A therefore will implicate the tax benefit rule. Taxpayer represents that it will
include $A in gross income in Year 3 under the tax benefit rule. Furthermore, Taxpayer
represents that no portion of the tax benefit income with respect to the assets in Trust A
is excludable under the exclusionary part of the tax benefit rule.

Taxpayer made contributions to Trust B for the purpose of providing postretirement
medical benefits for Taxpayer’s retired, bargaining unit employees. Taxpayer deducted
the amount of those contributions in accordance with section 419A(f)(5). The proposed
amendment to Trust B will allow the assets in Trust B to be used to provide current
medical benefits to Taxpayer’s active, non-bargaining unit employees. This use is
fundamentally inconsistent with the premise of the previously taken deductions. The
amendment of Trust B therefore will implicate the tax benefit rule. Taxpayer represents
that it will include the value of assets in Trust B on the effective date of the amendment
PLR-116667-18                                 8

in gross income in Year 3 under the tax benefit rule. Furthermore, Taxpayer represents
that no portion of the tax benefit income with respect to the assets in Trust B is
excludable under the exclusionary part of the tax benefit rule.

Ruling Requests 1 and 2: As explained above, section 4976(a) imposes a 100 percent
excise tax if an employer maintains a welfare benefit fund and there is a disqualified
benefit provided during any taxable year. A “disqualified benefit” is defined in section
4976(b)(1)(C) to include any portion of a welfare benefit fund reverting to the benefit of
the employer. Based on the information submitted by Taxpayer, the amendment of
Trust A and Trust B, or the use of Trust A and Trust B assets to provide medical
benefits to active, non-bargaining unit employees will not result in any portion of either
Trust A or Trust B reverting to the benefit of Taxpayer. Thus, the amendment of Trust A
and Trust B, and the use of Trust A and Trust B assets to provide medical benefits to
active, non-bargaining unit employees, will not result in a “disqualified benefit” within the
meaning of section 4976(b)(1)(C), and the transaction will not, in and of itself, cause
Taxpayer to be liable for the excise tax imposed by section 4976.

Ruling Requests 3 and 4: The amount of Trust A and Trust B assets that are used to
provide medical benefits under Plan C, and that will be included in Taxpayer’s gross
income in Year 3, will be treated as a contribution (within the meaning of section 419(a))
to Trust A and Trust B, respectively, in that tax year, and Taxpayer may take deductions
with respect to such contribution to the extent permitted by sections 419 and 419A.
Taxpayer will not be considered to have contributed to Trust A or Trust B any amount
that exceeds the amount that Taxpayer is taking into income under the tax benefit rule
pursuant to this ruling. Accordingly, the total amount that Taxpayer may deduct under
sections 419 and 419A as a result of the amendments of Trust A and Trust B cannot
exceed the amount taken into income under the tax benefit rule as a result of the
amendments.

We assume, without expressing an opinion, for purposes of this ruling, that Trust A and
Trust B may be amended as described and that the proposed amendments otherwise
can be effectuated and do not fail to meet the requirements of other applicable federal
and state law. Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. Specifically, no opinion is expressed regarding the amount of
any deductions under sections 419 and 419A.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Specifically, no opinion is
expressed regarding the tax consequences to Trust A and Trust B of the proposed
amendments (including, for example, under section 1001), nor is any opinion expressed
regarding the status under section 501(c)(9) of Trust A or Trust B.

Section 6110(k)(3) provides that this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-116667-18                               9


The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                     Sincerely,



                                     Janet A. Laufer
                                     Senior Technician Reviewer
                                     Health & Welfare Branch
                                     Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Employee Benefits, Exempt Organizations,
                                     and Employment Taxes)




cc:6

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.