Chief Counsel Advice 201926001 Released June 28, 2019 Advice

Interest allowed on non-liable spouse's misapplied remittance

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A wife joined her husband in selling property subject to a federal tax lien securing his old joint liabilities with a former spouse. Because an IRS discharge letter overstated the government's interest, the entire sale proceeds were remitted and part of the current wife's share was wrongly applied to tax years for which she had no liability. Chief Counsel advised that her remittance created an overpayment when the IRS received and applied it, so interest ran from that date. For amounts later credited, interest stops at the due date of the liability receiving the credit; for an amount refunded, it stops no more than 30 days before the refund check.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Is interest allowable when the IRS refunds a non-liable spouse's remittance after incorrectly applying it to the liable spouse's tax debt?
  • Outcome: Yes; interest begins when the remittance was received and applied, with the ending date governed by whether the overpayment is credited or refunded.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6611 and 6621

Full text (IRS public release)

           Office of Chief Counsel
           Internal Revenue Service
           memorandum
           Number: 201926001
           Release Date: 6/28/2019
           CC:PA:02:CConrad
           GL-122059-18

 UILC:     6611.00-00, 6611.04-00

  date:    March 21, 2019

     to:   Ann L. Darnold
           Senior Attorney (Oklahoma City)
           (Small Business/Self-Employed)

  from:    Pamela Wilson Fuller
           Senior Technician Reviewer
           (Procedure & Administration)


subject:   Overpayment Interest on Non-Liable Spouse's Remittance

           This Chief Counsel Advice responds to your request for assistance. This advice may
           not be used or cited as precedent.


           LEGEND


           Husband                        =                          --------------------
           Wife 1                         =                          -------------------
           Wife 2                         =                          -------------------------
           Year 1                         =                          -------
           Year 2                         =                          -------
           Year 5                         =                          -------
           Year 7                         =                          -------
           Year 9                         =                          -------
           Year 11                        =                          -------
           Year 12                        =                          -------
           Year 13                        =                          -------
           Year 14                        =                          -------
           Date A                         =                          ----------------
           Date B                         =                          -----------------
           Date C                         =                          -------------------
GL-122059-18

Date D                             =                                   -----------------
Date E                             =                                   -----------
Amount 1                           =                                   ------------------
Amount 2                           =                                   ----------------
Amount 3                           =                                   --------------
Amount 4                           =                                   ----------------
Amount 5                           =                                   ------------
State                              =                                   ---------


ISSUE

Whether interest is allowable on the refund of a remittance made by a non-liable spouse
that the Service incorrectly applied to the liable spouse’s tax liability?


CONCLUSION

Yes. Interest is allowable on the overpayment from the date the remittance was
received and applied by the Service (Date C, Year 13). Pursuant to section 6611(b)(1)
and (2), the date the interest stops depends on whether the overpayment is credited or
refunded.

FACTS

Husband and Wife 1 accrued a joint tax liability for the tax years Year 2 through Year 5.1
Husband and Wife 1 divorced in Year 7. Husband married Wife 2 in Year 9. In Year 9,
Husband and Wife 1’s joint tax liabilities remained outstanding. In Year 11, Wife 2 and
Husband purchased real property in State (the State property). The Service properly
filed a Notice of Federal Tax Lien with respect to Husband’s joint tax liability with Wife 1.

Pursuant to section 6325(b)(2)(A), Wife 2 and Husband requested a certificate of
discharge to remove the lien from the State property in exchange for payment equal to
the value of the government’s interest in the property. On Date A, Year 13, Wife 2 and
Husband sold the State property for Amount 1. On Date B, Year 13, the Service issued
a Letter 403, Conditional Commitment to Discharge Certain Property from Federal Tax
Lien to Husband and Wife 1, which incorrectly stated that the government’s interest in
the State property was equal to nearly the full amount of the sale proceeds. The
incorrect Letter 403 also stated that this was the amount required to be remitted to the
Service in order to receive a certificate of discharge.2 Based on the information in the
1
  The Form 911 provides that a tax liability accrued for tax years Year 2-Year 5, although the Service
ultimately applied the remittance to tax years Year 1 and Year 2.
2
  The difference between the amount provided in the Letter 403 and the actual amount of sale proceeds
from the sale of the State property is Amount 3.

                                                   2
GL-122059-18

Letter 403, the title collection company remitted a check for the full amount of the sale
proceeds (Amount 1) to the Service.

On Date C, Year 13, consistent with the erroneous information in the Letter 403, the
Service applied the full amount of the remittance to Husband and Wife 1’s Year 1 and
Year 2 joint tax accounts. At some point, Wife 2 realized that the information in the
Letter 403 was incorrect and that at least a portion of her share of the sale proceeds
had been applied to Husband’s separate tax liability. On Date D, Year 13, Wife 2 filed a
Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement, which requested a refund in
the amount of Amount 4 (one-half of the proceeds from the sale of the State property).
Also on Date D, Year 13, Wife 2 and Husband filed a Form 911, Request for Taxpayer
Advocate Service Assistance (And Application for Taxpayer Assistance Order), which
requested assistance to recover Wife 2’s requested refund.

The Service initially concluded that Wife 2 was entitled to the refund in the amount of
Amount 4. On Date E, Year 14, before the Service issued the refund, it learned that
Wife 2 and Husband had unpaid joint tax liabilities for tax years Year 12 and Year 13.

The Service credited portions of Wife 2’s overpayment against her joint tax liabilities for
Years 12 and 13.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

It is well settled that the government may only pay interest if specifically allowed by a
statutory provision. Fors v. United States, 14 Cl. Ct. 709 (Ct. Cl. 1988), citing Library of
Congress v. Shaw, 478 U.S. at 317-18, 106 S. Ct. at 2963; United States v. Thayer-
West Point Hotel, 329 U.S. 585, 588, 91 L. Ed. 521, 67 S. Ct. 398 (1947); United States
ex rel. Angarica v. Bayard, 127 U.S. 251, 260, 32 L. Ed. 159, 8 S. Ct. 1156 (1888).

Section 6611(a) provides that interest shall be allowed and paid upon any overpayment
in respect of any internal revenue tax at the overpayment rate established under section
6621. The Code and regulations do not define an overpayment. The Supreme Court
stated, “[W]e read the word "overpayment" in its usual sense, as meaning any payment
in excess of that which is properly due. . . .” Jones v. Liberty Glass Co., 332 U.S. 524,
531 (1947). See also United States v. Dalm, 494 U.S. 596, 609 n.6 ("The common
sense interpretation is that a tax is overpaid when a taxpayer pays more than is owed
for whatever reason or no reason at all.").

Section 6611(b) provides the period for which interest shall be allowed and paid on an
overpayment of tax. Pursuant to section 6611(b)(1), in the case of a credit, interest
shall be allowed and paid from the date of the overpayment to the due date of the
amount against which credit is taken. Section 6611(b)(2) provides that in the case of a
refund, overpayment interest shall be allowed and paid from the date of the


                                             3
GL-122059-18

overpayment to a date (to be determined by the Secretary) preceding the date of the
refund check by not more than 30 days.

Here, the remittance of Wife 2’s Amount 4, which was made in response to the incorrect
instructions in the Service’s Letter 403 regarding tax years Years 1 and 2, created an
overpayment of tax when the Service applied it to Years 1 and 2 because Wife 2 had no
tax liability for Years 1 and 2.

Pursuant to section 6611(a), overpayment interest is allowable from Date C, Year 13,
the date the remittance created the overpayment. As provided above, the date that
overpayment interest stops running depends on whether the Service credits or refunds
the overpayment. Here, the Service credited portions of Wife 2’s overpayment against
her unpaid tax liabilities for Years 12 and 13 in the amounts of Amount 2 and Amount 5,
respectively.

With respect to the portion of the overpayment credited to Wife 2’s joint Year 12 liability,
interest stops on the due date of Wife 2’s Year 12 joint return. Because the Amount 4
overpayment arose after the due date of Wife 2’s Year 12 joint tax return, no interest is
allowable on the portion of the overpayment credited to Year 12.

With respect the portion of the overpayment credited to Wife 2’s joint Year 13 liability,
interest stops on the due date of Wife 2’s Year 13 joint tax return. See section
6611(b)(1).

Pursuant to section 6611(b)(2), if the remaining amount of the overpayment is refunded,
interest is allowable to a date preceding the date of the refund check by not more than
30 days. If it is credited to another liability, interest is allowable to the due date of the
amount against which credit is taken.

This writing may contain privileged information. Any unauthorized disclosure of this
writing may undermine our ability to protect the privileged information. If disclosure is
determined to be necessary, please contact this office for our views.

Please call 202-317-6844 if you have any further questions.




                                             4

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.