Private Letter Ruling 201923010 Released June 7, 2019 Approved

Court-approved mitigation trust qualifies as a settlement fund

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Government agencies sued manufacturers over alleged legal violations involving a product, and consent decrees required money for mitigation projects benefiting a specified group. A court approved a statutory trust, retained continuing jurisdiction, and directed installment funds from the defendants and the court registry into that trust. The IRS ruled that the trust met all three requirements for a qualified settlement fund: governmental approval and oversight, claims arising from alleged legal violations, and segregation in a valid state-law trust. It also ruled that the transferred funds could be excluded from the trust's modified gross income because they were paid to resolve the liabilities for which the fund was created. The trust represented that none of the transfers was a dividend, interest on transferor debt, or compensation for delay.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the mitigation trust qualify as a qualified settlement fund, and may it exclude the settlement transfers from modified gross income?
  • Outcome: Approved on both questions.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 468B(g); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.468B-1(c) and 1.468B-2(b)(1)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201923010                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/7/2019                                         Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 468B.02-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
----------------------------                                   --------------------, ID No. -----------
------------------------------------------------------------   Telephone Number:
--------------------------                                     ----------------------
-----------------------------------                            Refer Reply To:
-----------------------------------                            CC:ITA:B06
 -------------------------------------                         PLR-121080-18
                                                               Date:
                                                               February 27, 2019




Legend

Act                                  =       -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             ----
Agency                               =
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------------
Court                                =       -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             ------------------------------------------------------
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Consent Decrees                      =
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             -------------------------------------------------------------
Court Order                          =       -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             -------------------
Date 1                               =
                                             ------------------------
Date 2                               =
                                             -------------------
Date 3                               =
                                             ---------------------------
Date 4                               =
                                             --------------------
Date 5                               =
                                             ----------------------------
Date 6                               =
                                             ----------------------
Date 7                               =
                                             ------------------------
Date 8                               =
                                             ---------------------------
PLR-121080-18                                    2

Date 9                        =
                                    ---------------------------
Defendants                    =
                                    --------------------------------------------------
Product Z                     =
                                    ----------------------------------------------------
Allocable Percentage          =     -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    -----
                                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trust                         =
                                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    --------
Beneficiaries                 =
                                    ----------------------------------------------------
Trustee                       =
                                    -------------------------------
State X                       =
                                    --------------
State Y                       =
                                    --------------
Dollar Amount A               =
                                    ----------------------
Dollar Amount B               =
                                    ----------------------
Dollar Amount C               =
                                    --------------------
Dollar Amount D               =
                                    -------------------
Dollar Amount E               =
                                    -------------------



Dear --------------------:

This letter responds to your letter dated June 21, 2018, and subsequent
correspondence submitted on behalf of the Trust, requesting certain rulings concerning
the application of various sections of the Internal Revenue Code and the Income Tax
Regulations to the Trust. In particular, you requested the following rulings:

1.       The Trust is a qualified settlement fund under section 1.468B-1(c).

2.      The Trust may exclude from its modified gross income, under section 1.468B-
2(b)(1), the amount of certain funds transferred to the Trust after its establishment as a
qualified settlement fund.
PLR-121080-18                                         3



FACTS

The Agency filed a complaint in the Court alleging that the Defendants violated certain
provisions of the Act with regard to the manufacture and design of Product Z. State X
filed a separate complaint alleging that Defendants had also violated State X laws with
regard to the manufacture and design of Product Z.

The Court entered Consent Decrees on Date 1 and Date 2, pursuant to which the
Defendants agreed ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------.

Dollar Amount A would be used to fund projects designed to ------------------------------------
------- caused by the Defendants from the manufacture and design of Product Z
(“Mitigation Projects”). The Allocable Percentage of Dollar Amount A would be required
to be held in trust to fund Mitigation Projects for the benefit of the Beneficiaries. The
remaining percentage of Dollar Amount A would be required to be held in trust to fund
Mitigation Projects for the benefit of a different group of beneficiaries which are not part
of this ruling. Pursuant to the Consent Decrees, as later modified by the Court Order,
once the court approved the trust agreement (“Trust Agreement”), a trust (the Trust)
was to be established for the Beneficiaries and a separate trust was to be established
for the beneficiaries that are not a part of this ruling.

Defendants were to pay Dollar Amount A in four installments with respect to the
Mitigation Projects. The first two installments were to be paid by the Defendants into
the Court’s registry (“Court Registry”), and after the two trusts were established, the final
two installments were to be paid by the Defendants to the Trustee, who would then
allocate the funds to the respective trusts in the prescribed percentages.

On Date 3 and Date 4, the Defendants deposited the first two installments (Dollar
Amount B) into the Court Registry. The funds were held in the Court Registry under the
Court’s sole dominion and control in an interest-bearing account. Interest earned on the
Dollar Amount B funds while held in the Court Registry did not reduce the Defendants’
obligations to pay the total of Dollar Amount A as established in the Consent Decrees.

On Date 5, the Court Order approved the Trust Agreement and ordered the
establishment of the two trusts. The Court appointed the same trustee to serve as
trustee for both groups of beneficiaries. On Date 6, pursuant to the Court Order, the
Trust was formed as a State Y statutory trust. At the same time, a separate trust was
also formed for the benefit of the other group of beneficiaries which are not part of this
ruling.
PLR-121080-18                                 4

On Date 7, the Court transferred Dollar Amount B and Dollar Amount C from the Court
Registry to the Trustee. Dollar Amount C represented the amount of interest earned on
Dollar Amount B while held in the Court Registry from Date 3 to Date 7. The Trustee
then allocated those funds to each of the two trusts in the prescribed percentages such
that the Trust received the Allocable Percentage of Dollar Amount B, along with the
Allocable Percentage of Dollar Amount C.

On Date 8, the Defendants transferred the third installment (Dollar Amount D) to the
Trustee. The Trustee then allocated the Allocable Percentage of Dollar Amount D to
the Trust.

On Date 9, the Defendants transferred the fourth and final installment (Dollar Amount E)
to the Trustee, and the Trustee allocated the Allocable Percentage of Dollar Amount E
to the Trust. The transfers of funds to the Trust on Date 7, Date 8 and Date 9 are
referred to as the “Transfers of Funds”.

Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, the Defendants retain no ownership or residual
interest with respect to the portion of Dollar Amount A and investment income thereof
that the Trust received. The Trust Agreement further provides that the Court will be the
sole and exclusive forum for enforcing the operation of the Trust and resolving disputes
related thereto.

RULINGS REQUESTED

1.     The Trust is a qualified settlement fund under section 1.468B-1(c).

2.    The Trust may exclude the Transfers of Funds from its modified gross income
under section 1.468B-2(b)(1).

REPRESENTATIONS

The Trust represents that none of the Transfers of Funds represents dividends on stock
of a transferor (or a related person), interest on debt of a transferor (or a related
person), or payments in compensation for late or delayed transfers.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

1.     Trust’s Status as a Qualified Settlement Fund under Section 1.468B-1(c)

The first requested ruling is that the Trust is a qualified settlement fund under section
1.468B-1(c) for Federal income tax purposes.

Section 468B(g)(1) provides that “[n]othing in any provision of law shall be construed as
providing that an escrow account, settlement fund, or similar fund is not subject to
PLR-121080-18                                   5

current income tax.” Section 468B(g)(1) authorizes the issuance of regulations
providing for the taxation of any such account or fund whether as a grantor trust or
otherwise. Sections 1.468B-1 through 1.468B-5 regarding qualified settlement funds
were issued pursuant to section 468B(g).

Section 1.468B-1(a) provides that a qualified settlement fund is a fund, account, or trust
that satisfies the three requirements of section 1.468B-1(c). First, section 1.468B-
1(c)(1) requires that the fund, account, or trust is established pursuant to an order of, or
it is approved by, the United States, any state (including the District of Columbia),
territory, possession, or political subdivision thereof, or any agency or instrumentality
(including a court of law) of any of the foregoing and is subject to the continuing
jurisdiction of that governmental authority. Second, section 1.468B-1(c)(2) requires that
the fund, account, or trust is established to resolve or satisfy one or more contested or
uncontested claims that have resulted or may result from an event (or related series of
events) that has occurred and that has given rise to at least one claim asserting liability
(i) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
of 1980; (ii) arising out of a tort, breach of contract, or violation of law; or (iii) designated
by the Commissioner in a revenue ruling or revenue procedure. Third, section 1.468B-
1(c)(3) provides that the fund, account, or trust must be a trust under applicable state
law, or its assets must be otherwise segregated from other assets of the transferor (and
related persons).

Based on the facts represented by the Trust, the three requirements of section 1.468B-
1(c) are satisfied, and as such, the Trust is a qualified settlement fund for Federal
income tax purposes. First, the Court entered an order approving the establishment of
the Trust and the Trust remains subject to the continuing jurisdiction of the Court. See
section 1.468B-1(c)(1). Second, the Trust was established to resolve or satisfy claims
of the Agency and State X that arose from Defendants’ violations of the Act and State X
laws which have given rise to at least one claim asserting liability. See section 1.468B-
1(c)(2). Third, the Trust was organized as a trust under applicable state law. See
section 1.468B-1(c)(3).

2.     Modified Gross Income/Transferred Funds Excluded under Section 1.468B-
       2(b)(1)

The second requested ruling is that the Trust may exclude the Transfers of Funds from
its modified gross income under section 1.468B-2(b)(1).

Section 61(a) provides that gross income means all income from whatever source
derived.

Section 1.468B-2(a) provides that a qualified settlement fund is a United States person
and is subject to tax on its modified gross income for any taxable year at a rate equal to
the maximum rate in effect for that taxable year under section 1(e).
PLR-121080-18                                  6


Section 1.468B-2(b) provides that the term modified gross income means “gross
income”, as defined in section 61, computed with certain modifications.

Under section 1.468B-2(b)(1), amounts transferred to the qualified settlement fund by,
or on behalf of, a transferor to resolve or satisfy a liability for which the fund is
established are excluded from gross income. However, dividends on stock of a
transferor (or a related person), interest on debt of a transferor (or a related person),
and payments in compensation for late or delayed transfers, are not excluded from
gross income.

The Trust was established to resolve or satisfy claims of the Agency and State X that
arose from the Defendants’ violations of the Act and State X laws. The Transfers of
Funds were made to resolve or satisfy the related liabilities. Such transfers were made
by the Defendants to the Trust via the Trustee, or from the Court Registry to the Trust
via the Trustee. Further, as represented by the Trust, none of the Transfers of Funds
falls within the three specific exceptions to the general provision in section 1.468B-
2(b)(1) that excludes transfers into the Trust from the Trust 's gross income.

Accordingly, based on the information submitted and representations made, we
conclude that the Trust may exclude the Transfers of Funds from its modified gross
income because the Trust may exclude such transfers from its gross income under
section 1.468B-2(b)(1).

PROCEDURAL MATTERS

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any Federal income tax return to which it is
relevant. Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this
requirement by attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control
number of the letter ruling.
PLR-121080-18                               7



The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.




                                     Sincerely,



                                     Roy A. Hirschhorn
                                     Branch Chief, Branch 6
                                     Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                     (Income Tax & Accounting)




cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.