Determination Letter 201922039 Released May 31, 2019 Denied Transcribed from scan

Gated homeowners association denied section 501(c)(4) exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A gated homeowners association sought recognition as a tax-exempt social welfare organization under section 501(c)(4). Its activities included maintaining private roads, common areas, recreational facilities, dining facilities, and security for property owners, while the general public could enter only for limited purposes such as golf, events, rentals, nonprofit meetings, or voting. The IRS denied exemption because the association primarily benefited its members and did not extend access to its common areas and facilities to the public on an equal, unrestricted basis. The IRS also concluded that, even if exemption were granted on appeal, it would not apply retroactively because the association applied more than 27 months after formation and had not filed the required Form 990-series returns or notices for three consecutive years. The Appeals Office sustained the adverse determination.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does the gated homeowners association qualify under section 501(c)(4), and if so, would recognition date back to its formation?
  • Outcome: Denied; the association primarily served its members, and the IRS also rejected retroactive recognition as an alternative conclusion.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(c)(4) and 7428; Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(4)-1; Rev. Ruls. 72-102, 74-99, and 80-63; Rev. Proc. 2017-5

Full text (IRS public release)

Scanned document; transcription proofread from IRS OCR. Obvious scan misreads were corrected; wording is otherwise verbatim.

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Appeals Office

San Jose Appeals, MS-7100 Person to Contact:
55 S. Market St., Suite 440
San Jose, CA 95113 Employee ID Number:
Tel:
Release Number: 201922039 Fax:
Release Date: 5/31/2019 Contact Hours:
Date: March 7, 2019 Refer Reply to:
In Re:
EO Determination
Tax Period(s) Ended:
UIL:
501.04-00

Dear _

This is a final adverse determination that you do not qualify for exemption from federal income tax under Internal
Revenue Code (the “Code”) section 501(a) as an organization described in Section 501(c)(4).

We made the adverse determination for the following reason(s):

You are not operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare within the meaning of Section
501(c)(4) and Treasury Regulation 1.501(c)(4)-1, as your activities primarily benefit your members.
You are a gated community with a guard manning the gate and membership is open to residents
only. You maintain private properties and primarily serve the needs of your members. Access to
your properties by the general public is only available on a limited basis. Your benefits to
nonmembers are insubstantial compared to those afforded to your members and are not extended
to both members and nonmembers on an equal basis.

You're required to file Federal income tax returns on Forms 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return. Mail your
form to the appropriate Internal Revenue Service Center per the form's instructions. You can get forms and
instructions by visiting our website at www.irs.gov/forms-pubs or by calling 800-TAX-FORM (800-829-3676).

We'll make this letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for public inspection under Code
section 6110 after deleting certain identifying information. We have provided to you, in a separate mailing, Notice
437, Notice of Intention to Disclose. Please review the Notice 437 and the documents attached that show our
proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow the instructions in Notice 437.

If you decide to contest this determination, you may file an action for declaratory judgment under the provisions of
section 7428 of the Code in either:

• United States Tax Court,
• The United States Court of Federal Claims,
• The United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

You must file a petition or complaint in one of these three courts within 90 days from the date we mailed this
determination letter to you. Contact the clerk of the appropriate court for rules and the appropriate forms for filing
petitions for declaratory judgment. You can write to the courts at the following addresses:

United States Tax Court
400 Second Street, NW
Washington, DC 20217

US Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, DC 20005

U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20001

Note: We will not delay processing income tax returns and assessing any taxes due even if you file petition for
declaratory judgment under section 7428 of the Code.

Please refer to the enclosed Publication 892, How to Appeals an IRS Determination on Tax -Exempt Status.
You also have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is not a

substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate cannot
reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have to file a petition in a United

States Court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter that may not have been resolved through

normal channels get prompt and proper handling. If you want Taxpayer Advocate assistance, please contact the

Taxpayer Advocate for the IRS office that issued this letter. You may call toll-free, 1-877-777-4778, for the Taxpayer

Advocate or visit www.irs.gov/advocate for more information.

If you have any questions, contact the person at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Appeals Team Manager

Enclosure: Publication 892

CC:

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: July 17, 2017

Employer ID number:
Contact person/ID number:
Contact telephone number:

Contact fax number:

Legend: UIL:

B = Date 501.04-00
C = State 501.04-06
D = Date

E = Number

F = Number

G = Number

H = Date

J= Date

K= Date

L = Number

Dear

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). Based on the information provided, we determined that you don’t qualify
for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. This letter explains the basis for our conclusion. Please

keep it for your records.

Issue
Do you qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code? No, for the reasons stated below.

Alternative Issue
In the event that upon appeal you are found to qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code, do
you qualify for exemption retroactively from your date of formation? No, for the reasons stated below.

Facts
You were incorporated on B in the State of C as a nonstock corporation. You submitted Form 1024 on K. Your

Articles of Incorporation indicate:

• You do not contemplate pecuniary gain or profit to your members and no part of your net
earnings will inure to the benefit of any member or individual except through the acquisition,
construction, management, maintenance or care of common areas or through the rebate of any

excess membership dues, fees, or assessments.

2

• Your purposes are (i) to provide for the acquisition, construction, management, maintenance and
care of common areas, and any area for which you are responsible: (ii) at your option to obtain,
manage and maintain services for the property, or sections thereof, including, as necessary,
refuse collection, landscape and storm water pond maintenance, street cleaning and snow
plowing: and (iii) to take other acts or actions which would promote the health, safety or welfare
of the owners and residents.

You also filed amended and restated Articles of Incorporation on D with the State of C. These show you have
one class of members which are the individual property owners in your Association. A person automatically
becomes a member upon his/her becoming an owner and will remain a member for so long as he/she is an
owner. Theses also indicate that your members have voting rights and each member has one (1) vote on each
matter for each lot owned and that you are managed by the Board of Directors. The number, terms, and election
of Board of Directors is fixed by your bylaws.

Your Form 1024 states you are comprised of E residential lots comprising approximately F acres. There are
about G residents, and common areas consisting of _ miles of roads and recreational areas. There is a
gatehouse at the only entrance to your gated property where there is a paid security patrol based. All members
have unrestricted access through this single point entry. In addition, the areas in your gated community
primarily for the exclusive benefit of your members consist of:

• monument entry signs
• miles of roadways
• Extensive greenbelts and slopes
• lakes/ponds
• Fences
• Recreational facilities consisting of:
  o 18-hole golf course
  o Clubhouse and dining facility
  o Fitness center
  o Indoor and outdoor swimming pools
  o Tennis courts and Bocce ball courts

Furthermore, you provide a private security force to serve your members/owners. Besides patrolling the
entrance to limit access, the patrol service duties include patrolling the gated community while watching out for
unusual or suspicious activity to provide security for members and reduce crime. Because of their presence in
your gated community, the patrol force like most private security services are often the first responders for
emergencies and consequently may interact with local law enforcement and emergency medical personnel.

Members of the general public only have access in the following situations:

• They are members of the golf club. Approximately % of homeowners in your association are annual
members of the golf club. There are no specific requirements to be allowed to join.

• They are part of a group that has rented event or meeting space in one of your two clubhouses.

• They are voting at your clubhouse, which is a designated polling location.

• They are a member of a nonprofit organization that is using meeting room space at the clubhouse.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

• They are a participant or attendee at one of the two annual golf tournaments at your golf course.

You indicated you are primarily engaged in promoting the common good and general welfare of the residents of
your association and surrounding areas. You also believe you are a community. You indicated that the “public”
consists of members of the “community,” not the world-at-large. You do not have any obligation to provide
access to the world-at-large. You do offer golf memberships to the public and the restaurant is also open to the
public. In addition, you provided the following:

1. You conduct road maintenance for the miles of roads you own, and are fully responsible for the
maintenance, repair and reconstruction of these roads. You believe your road maintenance activities
promote the general welfare of your members/owners and, because road maintenance is an essential
governmental function, the activities lessen the burdens of local government.

2. You believe the private patrol service promotes the general welfare of your community.

3. You provide for the maintenance of monument signs, greenbelts and fences that are adjacent to publicly
owned and operated streets. You wrote this is done as part of a beautification project for the benefit of
the public, meaning the world-at-large.

4. You maintain a clubhouse which is available to members and the public on a fee basis. The clubhouse is
also used occasionally as a polling location for all local, state, and national elections.

5. You provide for snow removal services on your streets during the winter months.

6. You operate and maintain an 18-hole golf course and eight tennis courts that are open to the public for a
fee.

You also wrote that some of your activities may benefit the general public. Meeting rooms in the clubhouse are
available for public rental. The bocce courts are sometimes used by the local Special Olympics group. You
present seasonal monthly concerts that are open to the general public. You host two annual golf tournaments for
a fee for charitable organizations. One of these is free for Veterans.

You have several committees which support your business and social activities for the benefit of your members.
These committees consist of :

Board of Directors

Budget and Finance Committee
Architectural Review Committee
Investment Committee

Facilities Committee

Grounds Committee

Golf Committee

Food and Beverage Committee
Community Relations Committee
Emergency Preparedness Committee

These committees provide a structure for your funding, determine that architectural covenants are complied
with, determine that your members/owners’ construction activities are within environmental guidelines, and
plan for long-term repair and replacement of your infrastructure assets.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

4

You are supported primarily by members’ assessment fees. Your income sources for the year ended H also
consisted of Recreation revenue (Golf, Dining, other), interest income and gains on sales, newsletter revenues
as well as other revenue. Furthermore your golf income is comprised of   % from public play; public revenues
from the dining facility make up % of total dining income.

Finally, you have filed Form 1120 or 1120H annually for the range of years of J. For the year ended H, you
filed Form 990. Since you believe that exempt status has always existed for you, you are requesting that exempt
status be granted retroactively to your formation date of as provided by Revenue Ruling 80-108 and Publication
557.

Law

Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code reads: Exemption from tax on corporations, certain trusts, etc.
(a) Exemption from taxation. An organization described in subsection (c) or (d) or Section 401(a) shall be
exempt from taxation under this subtitle unless such exemption is denied under Section 502 or 503. The
following organizations are referred to in subsection (a): (4) (A) Civic leagues or organizations not organized
for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, or local associations of employees, the
membership of which is limited to the employees of a designated person or persons in a particular municipality,
and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively to charitable, educational, or recreational purposes. (B)
Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an entity unless no part of the net earnings of such entity inures to the
benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Treasury Regulation Section 1.501(c)(4)-1 reads: Civic organizations and local associations of employees. (a)
Civic organizations--(1) In general. A civic league or organization may be exempt as an organization described
in Section 501(c)(4) of the Code if: (i) It is not organized or operated for profit; and (ii) It is operated
exclusively for the promotion of social welfare. (2) Promotion of social welfare--(i) In general. An organization
is operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare if it is primarily engaged in promoting in some way
the common good and general welfare of the people of the community. An organization embraced within this
section is one which is operated primarily for the purpose of bringing about civic betterments and social
improvements.

Revenue Ruling 72-102, 1972-1 CB 149 provides that the organization is a membership organization that was
formed by a developer and is operated to administer and enforce covenants for preserving the architecture and
appearance of a housing development, and to own and maintain common green areas, streets, and sidewalks for
the use of all development residents. Its activities are for the common benefit of the whole development rather
than for individual residents or the developer.

Revenue Ruling 74-99, 1974-1 C.B. 131, modified Rev. Rul. 72-102 and held that a homeowners association, in
order to qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code, must, in addition to otherwise qualifying
for exemption under Section 501(c)(4), satisfy the following requirements: (1) It must engage in activities that
confer benefit on a community comprising a geographical unit which bears a reasonably recognizable
relationship to an area ordinarily identified as a governmental subdivision or a unit or district thereof; (2) It
must not conduct activities directed to the exterior maintenance of private residences; and (3) It owns and
maintains only common areas or facilities such as roadways and parklands, sidewalks and street lights, access
to, or the use and enjoyment of which is extended to members of the general public and is not restricted to
members of the homeowners' association.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

5

Revenue Ruling 80-63, 1980-1 CB 116, to clarify Revenue Ruling 74-99, describes specific questions that have
been raised and their answers are as follows:

The first question asks does Rev. Rul. 74-99 contemplate that the term "community" for purposes of section
501(c)(4) of the Code embraces a minimum area or a certain number of homeowners.

The answer is no because Rev. Rul. 74-99 states that it was not possible to formulate a precise definition of the
term "community". The ruling merely indicates what the term is generally understood to mean. Whether a
particular homeowners' association meets the requirements of conferring benefit on a community must be
determined according to the facts and circumstances of the individual case. Thus, although the area represented
by an association may not be a community within the meaning of that term as contemplated by Rev. Rul. 74-99,
if the association's activities benefit a community, it may still qualify for exemption. For instance, if the
association owns and maintains common areas and facilities for the use and enjoyment of the general public as
distinguished from areas and facilities whose use and enjoyment is controlled and restricted to members of the
association then it may satisfy the requirement of serving a community.

The second question asks may a homeowners' association, which represents an area that is not a community,
qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code if it restricts the use of its recreational facilities, such
as swimming pools, tennis courts, and picnic areas, to members of the association?

The answer is no because Rev. Rul. 74-99 points out that the use and enjoyment of the common areas owned
and maintained by a homeowners’ association must be extended to members of the general public, as
distinguished from controlled use or access restricted to the members of the association. For purposes of Rev.
Rul. 74-99, recreational facilities are included in the definition of "common areas".

Revenue Ruling 80-108, 1980-1 CB 119 describes an organization, which otherwise qualifies for exemption
from federal income tax under both section 501(c)(3) and Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. The Rev. Rul. states
that the organization did not file for recognition of exemption under Section 501(c)(3) within 15 months from
the end of the month in which it was organized as required by Treasury Regulations Section 1.508-1(a)(2)(i),
but established that it qualifies for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) from the date of its organization to the
date its exemption under section 501(c)(3) becomes effective.

Revenue Procedure 2017-5, 2017-1 I.R.B. 2321, describes the procedures for submitting applications for
recognition of Exempt Status under Section 501 or Section 521 in Section 6. This includes:

(1) Item 03 of Section 6 states an organization seeking recognition of exempt status under Section 501 or
Section 521 is required to submit the appropriate completed application form or the appropriate
completed letter request. In the case of a numbered application form, the current version of the form
must be submitted.

(2) Item 08 of Section 6 states a determination letter recognizing exemption of an organization described in
Section 501(c), other than Section 501(c)(29), is usually effective as of the date of formation of an
organization if: (1) its purposes and activities prior to the date of the determination letter have been
consistent with the requirements for exemption; (2) it has not failed to file required Form 990 series
returns or notices for three consecutive years; and (3) it has filed an application for recognition of
exemption within 27 months from the end of the month in which it was organized.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

6

(3) Item 08 of Section 6 further describes when an application is not submitted within 27 months of
formation. An organization that otherwise meets the requirements for tax-exempt status and the issuance
of a determination letter that does not meet the requirements for recognition from date of formation will
generally be recognized from the postmark date of its application or the submission date of its 1023-EZ,
as applicable.

In Commissioner v. Lake Forest, Inc., 305 F.2d 814 (1962), the case involved a nonprofit membership housing
cooperative that provided low cost housing to its members. In denying exemption, the court stated that the
organization was not organized exclusively for the promotion of social welfare. The court found that although
its activities were available to all citizens eligible for membership, "its contribution is neither to the public at
large nor of a public character." The court looked to the benefits provided and not to the number of persons who
received benefits through membership.

In Flat Top Lake Association v. United States (1989 4th Circuit), 868 F.2d 108, the Court held that a
homeowners association did not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code when it did not
benefit a "community" bearing a recognizable relationship to a governmental unit and when its common areas
or facilities were not for the use and enjoyment of the general public.

In Indian Lake Property Owners Association v. Director of Revenue, 813 S.W.2d 305 (1991) the Supreme
Court of Missouri, Holstein, J., held that: (1) homeowners' association that enforced subdivision covenants,
maintained subdivision roads, and provided security and trash collection services to residences within the
subdivision was not a "civic organization" entitled to sales and use tax exemption, and (2) to qualify as a "civic
organization," an organization's purposes and functions must be concerned with and relate to citizenry at large.
Further, the judge discusses Flat Top Lake within the text, stating, "Clearly Congress believed that an
organization cannot serve social welfare if it denies its benefits to the general public. Implicitly, Congress
recognized that a true "community" functions within a broader national fabric. Service to such a community
thereby furthers the national interest by expanding potential, by opening opportunities to all citizens who may
find themselves within the bounds of that particular community." Exemption denied (affirmed).

In Lake Petersburg Association v. C.I.R., T.C. Memo 1974-55, 33 T.C.M. (CCH) 259, T.C.M. (P-H) P 74,055,
1974 PH TC Memo 74,055 (1974), the Association was an idea presented by the Petersburg Chamber of
Commerce to help stimulate the economy in the surrounding area. A group of businessmen contributed capital
and acquired capital from other sources such as the City, the Chamber and two banks, to obtain funding to
purchase property and develop it. They formed an association, which required prospective owners to become
dues-paying members. The dues helped finance the development of the lake and recreational facilities on said
property. Use of the assets was limited to members and their guests. The Association's basis for their argument
is that the organization was created to stimulate the economy and make it a better place to live, thereby fulfilling
the requirement of a social welfare organization under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. The respondent argued
that it was operated primarily for the benefit of its members and therefore did not qualify. The Court found that
regardless of the original intent, the actual benefit went to the members and any economic benefits to the
Petersburg citizens were "indirect and remote." Exemption was denied.

In Rancho Santa Fe Association v. United States, 589 F. Supp. 54, 54 A.F.T.R. 2d 84-5518 (1984), the

Association's request for affirmation of their exempt status as a Section 501(c)(4) of the Code organization was
granted by the Court. The facts are that the Association consists of 6,100 acres of property, 600 acres of which
is owned by the Association and the rest by members who are property owners. Of the 600 acres owned by the

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

7

Association, 465 acres are dedicated to parkland and open space, playgrounds, athletic fields, a public parking
lot, a community clubhouse, and hiking and bridle trails, which are all open to the public. The remaining 135
acres comprise an 18-hole golf course and eight tennis courts which are only available to members. The
Association oversees the governance of the property, furnishes private security protection, and functions as a
liaison between the community and the Board of Supervisors on issues which require the participation of larger
governmental entities, such as maintenance of the rights-of-way and the sanitation system. Finally, the
Association serves the community in loaning out its facilities free of charge to various public service
organizations as well as to the schools. The court decided that "It performs the functions of a governmental
entity and brings about civic betterments and social improvements that would be sorely missed by the Rancho
Santa Fe community should they be lost or curtailed.". Exemption was granted.

Application of law

You are not described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Code and Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(4)-1. Although you
claim to be open to the general public, all of your common areas and facilities such as streets, road ways,
greenbelt ways, lakes/ponds, swimming pools, bocce ball and tennis courts, golf course, fitness center,
clubhouse and dining facilities are enclosed within the gated property. You have a single point gated entry.
Access to the property and all of the amenities are restricted to members of the association, their guests, and
members of the golf course. A manned gate house prevents access to the general public who are not members of
the golf club unless they are coming to vote, renting the clubhouse or meeting space, or taking part in an event.
The general public does not have unrestricted access to your community.

You are not similar to the organization in Revenue Ruling 72-102, 1972-1 CB 149. You restrict access as well
as provide services that benefit member owners.

You are not similar to the organizations in Revenue Ruling 74-99 and Revenue Ruling 80-63 where the general
public significantly benefited from the organizations operations.

You restrict the general public from access to your facilities, thereby failing to confer a benefit onto the
community. Where there is failure to serve the community, there is a failure to promote social welfare, which is
a requirement for an organization to be described under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. An organization exempt
under Section 501(c)(4) must operate "exclusively for the promotion of social welfare" which is further
explained by the Regulations thus being primarily engaged in promoting in some way the common good and
general welfare of the people of the community. Revenue Ruling 74-99 confirms that the benefit must be
conferred to "the community". Revenue Ruling 80-63 clarifies Revenue Ruling 74-99 stating that while a
"community" cannot be strictly defined, that if the association owns and maintains common areas and facilities
for the use and enjoyment of the general public as distinguished from areas and facilities whose use and
enjoyment is controlled and restricted to members of the association then it may satisfy the requirement of
serving a community. The security gatehouses to your fenced in property and the fact there is a single point
entry exclude the general public from entering the property. Excluding the public does not conform to the
definition of a Section 501(c)(4) organization. Nonmembers are generally only granted access when coming to
vote or taking part in specific events or to play golf as a member of the golf club.

Unlike the organizations in Revenue Ruling 74-99 and Revenue Ruling 80-63 your activities do not serve the
general public.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

You do not operate in a way that significantly benefits the surrounding community, as required by Section
501(c)(4) of the Code and explained in Revenue Ruling 80-63. This was also an issue in the Commissioner v.
Lake Forest, supra, case where the court ruled against exemption for the organization. The amount of benefit,
not the number of people receiving the benefits, was at issue. The public benefit was insignificant and
warranted a loss in exempt status. Similarly, your benefit to the general public is insignificant. Unless they are
coming on the property for a specific purpose or event, you do not provide unrestricted access to streets, road
ways, greenbelt ways, lakes/ponds, swimming pools, bocce ball and tennis courts, golf course, fitness center,
clubhouse and dining facilities and the like to the general public beyond your members and guests.

You are similar to the organizations in Commissioner v. Lake Forest, supra, Flat Top Lake Association, supra,
Indian Lake Property Owners Association, supra, and Lake Petersburg Association v. C.I.R., supra where the
general public did not significantly benefit from the activities of the organizations. You are not similar to the
organization in Rancho Santa Fe Association v. U.S.A., supra.

Court documents for Indian Lake Property Owners Association, supra, state that an organization "cannot serve
social welfare if it denies its benefits to the general public." Clearly, you are denying benefits to the public by
having a manned gate house with one single point of entry that restricts access. Similar to the Indian Lake case,
you are not serving the public. The usage of the property by guests who are permitted to enter is minimal and
incidental. This is not in accordance with a Section 501(c)(4) of the Code. Based on the fact patterns, tax-
exempt status should also be denied.

The lack of public benefit is closely aligned with those as seen in Flat Top Lake v. U.S.A., supra, and Lake
Petersburg Association v. C.I.R., supra. Similar to Lake Petersburg, you limit the facilities to members and their
guests. The manned gate house on the access point restricts anyone other than members and guest to use the
streets, road ways, greenbelt ways, lakes/ponds, swimming pools, bocce ball and tennis courts, golf course,
fitness center, clubhouse and dining facilities. All of the maintenance and upkeep benefit the members. In
addition, as stated in Flat Top, the organization "operates for the exclusive benefit of its members and does not
serve a ‘community’ as that term relates to the broader concept of social welfare." The courts denied exemption
to these aforementioned organizations. Following similar fact patterns, tax-exempt status should also be denied.

You are not similar to the organization described in Rancho Santa Fe Association v. U.S.A. For example, you
do not provide vast amounts of parkland, open space, facilities and equipment to the public. In addition, you
only provide the usage of your facilities and roads to members and guests. You have a single point entry to your
grounds. Members of the general public are allowed only access if they are paying members of the golf course,
guests of your members, have rented or are guests of individuals who have rented the facilities, or are guests of
non-profits using your facilities. Unrestricted access to members of the general public is only permitted if they
are coming on your property for the purpose of voting only. Unlike Rancho Santa Fe Association, all of your
amenities are not primarily available to the neighborhood community beyond your members, their guests,
paying members and guests. Based on the facts, you are not a community within yourself such as the
organization in Rancho Santa Fe and this precludes you from tax exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the
Code.

Alternate Issue

If upon appeal you are granted exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code, you should not qualify for
exemption retroactively from your date of formation. As stated in Revenue Procedure 2017-5, a determination
letter or ruling is usually effective as of the date of formation if (1) its purposes and activities prior to the date of

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

9

the determination letter or ruling have been consistent with the requirements for exemption; (2) it has not failed
to file the required Form 990 series returns or notices for three consecutive years; and (3) it has filed an
application for recognition of exemption within 27 months from the end of the month in which it was organized.

You submitted Form 1024 about L years after your formation. You submitted tax forms Form 1120/ 1120H for
the range of years of J. In filing Form 1120 or 1120H since your formation, you have held yourself out to the
public and the Service as a taxable entity. This is contrary to your position that your purposes and activities
prior to your submission of the Form 1024 and the filing of the Form 990 were consistent with the requirements
for exemption. In addition, you only began filing Form 990 for the year ended H proving that you have not met
the requirement that you file a notice or a 990 return for three consecutive years.

Finally you are dissimilar to the organization described in Rev. Rul. 80-108, which is an organization described
in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. You would not qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) as a property
owners association.

Conclusion
You are not described under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code because you are not operated exclusively for the
promotion of social welfare and your net earnings inure to the benefit of your association members.

Likewise, you do not meet the requirements of Treas. Reg. Section 1.501(c)(4)-1 because you are not primarily
engaged in promoting the common good and general welfare of the people of the community.

The common areas and roadways of your property are enclosed in the gated property at a single point entrance.
Only your members, members of the golf course, individuals and companies renting the facilities, non-profit
organizations being allowed to use the facilities and guests of any of the previous are permitted to enter and use
the amenities. The public is thereby restricted from accessing the common areas of your property, which does
not primarily further the exempt purpose of an organization exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code.

If upon appeal you are granted exemption under Section 501(c)(4) of the Code, you should not qualify for
exemption retroactively from your date of formation. You failed the requirements in Section of Revenue
Procedure 2017-5 that you did not file Form 990 series or notices for three consecutive years. You also failed
to file an application for recognition of exemption within 27 months from the end of the month in which you
were organized. Therefore, if you are granted exemption under Section 501(c)(4) upon Appeal, you do not
qualify for recognition of exemption from your formation date.

If you don’t agree
You have a right to file a protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, you

must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement must include:

• Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone
number

• A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with

• An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting documents

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

10

• The law or authority, if any, you are relying on

• The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization, or your authorized representative

• One of the following declarations:

For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined this protest statement, including

accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

For authorized representatives:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I prepared this protest statement, including
accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if he or she hasn’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.

We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our determination. If
so, we'll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t provided a
basis for reconsideration, we’ll forward your case to the Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more
information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-
Exempt Status.

If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later date because
the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code).

Where to send your protest
Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to the applicable
address:

U.S. mail: Street address for delivery service:
Internal Revenue Service Internal Revenue Service

EO Determinations Quality Assurance EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008 550 Main Street, Room 7-008

P.O. Box 2508 Cincinnati, OH 45202

Cincinnati, OH 45201

You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that he or she received
it.

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

11

If you agree

If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from you
within 30 days, we’ll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on your
income tax filing requirements.

You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at www.irs.gov/formspubs. If
you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

We sent a copy of this letter to your representative as indicated in your power of attorney.

Sincerely,

Stephen A. Martin
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Cc: POA

Letter 4034 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47628K

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.