DIF examination score could be withheld under section 6103
Apply this to your situation
This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised that the IRS did not need to invoke a common-law privilege to withhold information protected by federal statute. Section 6103(b)(2)(A) expressly provides that no law requires disclosure of standards used to select returns for examination. A Discriminant Function, or DIF, score falls within that category, so the IRS could withhold the score under the statute itself.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: Could the IRS withhold a DIF score in discovery without asserting a common-law privilege?
- Outcome: yes; section 6103(b)(2)(A) protects it as an examination-selection standard
- Key authorities: IRC § 6103(b)(2)(A); Federal Rule of Evidence 501
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2019022212164949
UILC: 6103.00-00, 6103.01-00
Number: 201919011
Release Date: 5/10/2019
From:
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2019 12:16:50 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: Additional Discovery Question
Hi,
The IRS does not need to assert any common law privileges to withhold information protected
by a federal statute. FRE 501. The flush language of section 6103(b)(2)(A) reads, “Nothing in
the preceding sentence, or in any other provision of law, shall be construed to require the
disclosure of standards used or to be used for the selection of returns for examination…” A
DIF score fits this category. We would withhold a DIF score under section 6103(b)(2)(A).
Let me know if you have any other questions—happy to help.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2019, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.