Non-pro-rata operating agreement amendment received S election relief

Number
201908015
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
More than One Class of Stock; Ceases to be Small Business Corporation; Inadvertent Terminations
Code sections
§ 1361, § 1362, § 6110
Ruling dated
November 14, 2018
Publicly released
February 22, 2019

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An S corporation amended its operating agreement to permit non-pro-rata allocations, creating a second class of stock and terminating its S election. The corporation later corrected the operating agreement to require pro rata allocations. It represented that neither it nor its shareholders intended to terminate the election, that they had consistently filed as an S corporation, and that they would make any adjustments required by the IRS. The IRS found the termination inadvertent under IRC § 1362(f) and allowed the corporation to continue to be treated as an S corporation from the termination date forward, provided the election was not otherwise terminated.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation receive inadvertent termination relief after its operating agreement permitted non-pro-rata allocations?
  • Outcome: Approved. The corrected corporation continued to be treated as an S corporation from the termination date forward.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361 and 1362; Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(l)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201908015
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/22/2019
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00, 1362.02-02,
1361.01-04
Person To Contact:
------------------, ID No. ----------------
-----------------------
Telephone Number:
----------------------------------
--------------------
---------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
--------------------------
CC:PSI:B01
PLR-119577-18
Date:
November 14, 2018

LEGEND

X = ---------------------------
-----------------------------------------

Date 1 = ------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = ---------------------

State = ------------

Dear -------------:

This responds to a letter signed June 11, 2018, submitted on behalf of X by X’s authorized representative, requesting relief under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code).

FACTS

According to the information submitted and representations within, X was formed on Date 1, under the laws of State. Effective Date 2, X elected to be taxed as an S corporation.

On Date 3, X amended its operating agreement. The amendment provided for allocations that are not pro rata creating a second class of stock, and, thus, terminated its S corporation election effective Date 3. X represents that it has taken corrective
PLR-119577-18
2

action and amended the operating agreement to allow for pro rata allocations thus correcting the second class of stock issue.

X represents that neither X nor its shareholders intended to terminate X’s Subchapter S election and that X and its shareholders have filed consistently with being an S corporation. In addition, X represents that, other than the termination due to a second class of stock, X has qualified as a small business corporation at all times since its election on Date 2. Lastly, X and its shareholders agree to make any adjustments required as a condition of obtaining relief under the inadvertent termination rule as provided under § 1362(f) of the Code as may be required by the Secretary.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 1361(a)(1) provides that the term “S corporation” means, with respect to any taxable year, a small business corporation for which an election under § 1362(a) is in effect for the year. Section 1361(b)(1) defines a “small business corporation” as a domestic corporation which is not an ineligible corporation which does not (A) have more than 100 shareholders, (B) have as a shareholder a person (other than an estate, and a trust described in subsection (c)(2), or an organization described in subsection (c)(6)) who is not an individual, (C) have a nonresident alien as a shareholder, and (D) have more than 1 class of stock.

Section 1362(d)(2)(A) provides that an election under § 1362(a) shall be terminated whenever (at any time on or after the 1st day of the taxable year for which the corporation is an S corporation) such corporation ceases to be a small business corporation. Section 1362(d)(2)(B) further provides that the termination shall be effective on and after the date of cessation.

Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-1(I)(1) provides that a corporation is generally treated as having only one class of stock if all outstanding shares of stock of the corporation confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds.

Section § 1.1361-1(I)(2)(i) provides, in part, that the determination of whether all outstanding shares of stock confer identical rights to distribution and liquidation proceeds is made based on the corporate charter, articles of incorporation, bylaws, applicable state laws, and binding agreements relating to distribution and liquidation proceeds (collectively, governing provisions). Although a corporation is not treated as having more than one class of stock so long as the governing provisions provide for identical distribution and liquidation rights, any distributions (including actual, constructive, or deemed distributions) that differ in timing and amount are to be given appropriate tax effect in accordance with the facts and circumstances.

Section 1362(f) provides in part that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any corporation was terminated under § 1362(d), (2) the Secretary determines that the
PLR-119577-18
3

circumstances resulting in the termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of time after the discovery of the circumstances resulting in the termination, steps were taken so that the corporation for which the termination occurred is a small business corporation, and (4) the corporation for which the termination occurred, and each person who was a shareholder in such corporation at any time during the period of inadvertent termination of the S election, agrees to makes such adjustments (consistent with the treatment of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the termination, the corporation is treated as an S corporation during the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that X’s S corporation election terminated Date 3, and that the termination was inadvertent within the meaning of § 1362(f). Therefore, X will be treated as an S corporation effective Date 3 and thereafter, provided X’s S corporation election is not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

Except as specifically ruled upon above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. Specifically, we express or imply no opinion regarding X’s eligibility to be an S corporation.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Laura C. Fields
Laura C. Fields
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace