Partnership gets 120 extra days to make a late Section 754 basis-adjustment election

Number
201852013
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Extension of Time to Make a Section 754 Election
Code sections
§ 754, § 734, § 743
Ruling dated
September 20, 2018
Publicly released
February 1, 2019

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2019, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2019
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited partnership meant to make a Section 754 election, which lets a partnership adjust the tax basis of its assets after a partner dies or a partnership interest changes hands, so the new owner is not stuck with mismatched basis. Here a partner (who held the interest through a trust) died, and the partnership intended to make the election with the return for that year but never filed a properly executed election by the deadline. The partnership asked the IRS for "9100 relief," the discretionary extension available under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 when a taxpayer misses a regulatory election deadline but acted reasonably and in good faith. The IRS agreed the requirements were met and gave the partnership 120 days from the date of the letter to make the election. The relief is conditioned on the partnership and its partners going back and adjusting basis (and depreciation) as if the election had been timely, even for years the statute of limitations has closed. Anyone who blew a § 754 election deadline would care because this is the standard path to fix it.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should the partnership get more time to make a late Section 754 election after inadvertently failing to file it?
  • Outcome: Approved (120-day extension granted, contingent on conforming basis and depreciation adjustments)
  • Key authorities: IRC § 754 (with §§ 734(b), 743(b)); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201852013
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 12/28/2018
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 754.00-00, 9100.00-00,
9100.15-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
------------------------------------------ ----------------------
-------------------
Refer Reply To:
----------------------------------------
CC:PSI:01
PLR-112769-18
Date:
September 20, 2018

LEGEND

X = --------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
--
---------------------------------------

A = -----------------

Date 1 = ----------------------

Date 2 = ------------------------

State = ---------------------

Year = -------

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated March 25, 2018, and subsequent correspondence submitted on behalf of X, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

The information submitted states that X was formed on Date 1 under the laws of State as a limited partnership classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. A, who owned an interest in X through a trust, died on Date 2. X intended to file an election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property with its return for its taxable year ending in Year. However, X inadvertently failed to file a properly executed § 754 election.

X represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith, that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government, and that it is not using hindsight in making the election.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 754 provides that a partnership may elect to adjust the basis of partnership property when there is a distribution of property or a transfer of a partnership interest.

An election under § 754 applies with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, must be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs.

For the election to be valid, the statement must (i) set forth the name and address of the partnership making the election, (ii) be signed by any one of the partners, and (iii) contain a declaration that the partnership elects under § 754 to apply the provisions of §§ 734(b) and 743(b).

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) defines the term "regulatory election" as including an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register, or a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, announcement, or notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards that the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides rules for requesting extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to make a § 754 election for its taxable year ended in Year. The election should be made in a written statement filed with the appropriate service center. A copy of this letter should be attached to the § 754 election. A copy is enclosed for that purpose.

This ruling is contingent on X adjusting the basis of its properties to reflect any § 734(b) or 743(b) adjustments that would have been made if the § 754 election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect any additional depreciation that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Any depreciation deduction allowable for an open year is to be computed based upon the remaining useful life and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made. Additionally, the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect what that basis would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional depreciation that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.

Except as specifically ruled upon above, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the tax consequences of any facts discussed or referenced in this letter. This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, copies of this letter ruling will be sent to your authorized representatives.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Laura C. Fields
By:
Laura C. Fields
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 1
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of letter
Copy of letter for §6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace