Grants 120 days for a late section 754 election after a partnership-interest transfer

Number
201841003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Timeliness of Election; Section 754, Manner of Electing Optional Adjustment to Basis of Partnership Property
Code sections
§ 754, § 734, § 743, § 6031
Ruling dated
July 17, 2018
Publicly released
October 12, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A limited liability company taxed as a partnership timely filed its return for a year in which one member transferred part of its interest to another member, but it did not attach a section 754 election. The IRS found that the partnership acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief would not prejudice the government. It granted 120 days to file the written section 754 election for that year and later years. The relief requires the partnership to make every section 734(b) or 743(b) adjustment that would have applied with a timely election, including additional allowable depreciation, even for years whose assessment or refund periods have closed. The partners must likewise reconstruct their outside bases and reduce them for any additional depreciation that would have been allowable.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the partnership make a late section 754 election for the year of a partnership-interest transfer?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to elect and retroactive basis-adjustment conditions
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 754, 734(b), and 743(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b), 1.6031(a)-1(e), and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201841003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 10/12/2018
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 9100.15-00, 754.02-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------, ID # ------------------------
----------------------------
--------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------
--------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-114118-18
Date:
July 17, 2018

LEGEND

X = ----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------

State = ---------

Y = ----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------

D1 = ------

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated April 23, 2018, submitted on behalf of X requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under § 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

According to the information submitted, X is a State limited liability company classified as a partnership for federal tax purposes. In D1, one of X’s members transferred part of its interest in X to another member, Y. X’s return for the D1 taxable year was filed timely, but a § 754 election to adjust the basis of partnership property

was not filed with the return. X represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 754 provides that a partnership may elect to adjust the basis of partnership property when there is a distribution of property or a transfer of a partnership interest. An election under § 754 applies with respect to all distributions of property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the taxable year with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable years.

Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a partnership, must be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “regulatory election” includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in the Federal Register.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

CONCLUSION

Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to

make a § 754 election for its D1 taxable year and thereafter. The election should be made in a written statement filed with the applicable service center for association with X's return for its D1 taxable year. A copy of this letter should be attached to the statement filed.

This ruling is contingent on X adjusting the basis of its properties to reflect any § 734(b) or § 743(b) adjustments that would have been made had the § 754 election been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect any additional depreciation that would have been allowable had the § 754 election been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late election relief. Any depreciation deduction allowable for an open year is to be computed based upon the remaining useful life and using property basis adjusted by the greater of any depreciation allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election been timely made. Additionally, X’s partners must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect what that basis would be had the § 754 election been timely made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late election relief. Specifically, X’s partners must reduce the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional depreciation that would have been allowable had the § 754 election been timely made.

Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the election.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. According to § 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this letter to X’s authorized representative.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

By:__/s/_________
Mary Beth Carchia
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

Copy of this letter
Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace