Says a pending QTIP extension request is relevant to an estate refund claim

Number
201835005
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Portability Election under § 2010(c)(5)(A)
Topics
Code sections
§ 2010, § 2056
Ruling dated
April 25, 2018
Publicly released
August 31, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An IRS office was considering an estate's refund claim while the taxpayer sought a private letter ruling for more time to sever a trust and make a qualified terminable interest property election. Chief Counsel advised that the ruling request presented an issue relevant to the refund claim. The decedent was survived by a spouse, and the executor had timely filed a complete and properly prepared estate tax return. That return made a portability election under section 2010(c)(5)(A), allowing the estate to take the deceased spouse's unused exclusion amount into account. The memorandum does not state how the refund claim or ruling request should ultimately be resolved.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Was the pending request for relief to sever a trust and make a QTIP election relevant to the estate's refund claim?
  • Outcome: Advice given, Chief Counsel said the ruling request raised an issue relevant to the refund claim.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2010(c)(2), 2010(c)(5)(A), and 2056(b)(7); Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2018042614222765
UILC: 2010.04-00

Number: 201835005
Release Date: 8/31/2018
From: ----------------------
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:22:27 PM
To: --------------------
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: FW: L Case letter

From:
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:16 PM
To:
Subject: L Case letter

ATTACHMENT 1

Office of Chief Counsel
Internal Revenue Service
memorandum
CC:PSI:B04:
PLR-133235-17

DATE: April 25, 2018

TO:

FROM:

SUBJECT: ----------------------------------------------------------

This is in reference to a claim for refund that your office is currently considering, filed by the above-referenced taxpayer on -----------------------. As we discussed in our telephone call on ------------------, the taxpayer is now seeking a private letter ruling from our office for an extension of time under § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to sever a trust and to make a qualified terminable interest property election under § 2056(b)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code.

We believe the taxpayer’s request for a private letter ruling presents an issue that is relevant to your consideration of the taxpayer’s refund claim. The decedent was survived by his spouse. The executor of the decedent’s estate timely filed a complete and properly prepared Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return. In so doing, the estate made a portability election on the return for purposes of § 2010(c)(5)(A), permitting the estate to take into account decedent’s deceased spousal unused exclusion amount under § 2010(c)(2).

If you have any further questions, please contact ------------------------- ----------------
---------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace