Grants 120 days for late GST exemption allocation

Number
201834005
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Special Rules for Allocation of GST Exemption; Deemed Allocation to Certain Lifetime Direct Skips; Definitions; Extension of Time for Making Certain Elections
Code sections
§ 2044, § 2601, § 2602, § 2611, § 2631, § 2632, § 2641, § 2642, § 2652, § 6110
Ruling dated
May 14, 2018
Publicly released
August 24, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An estate timely filed its federal estate and generation-skipping transfer tax return, but its CPA failed to allocate the decedent's available GST exemption to a trust with generation-skipping potential. The personal representative requested additional time under section 2642(g)(1) and the Treasury regulations governing late regulatory elections. The IRS found that the estate acted reasonably and in good faith because it had relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make the allocation. It granted 120 days from the ruling date to allocate the exemption on a supplemental Form 706. The allocation would be effective as of the original transfer date and would use the trust property's value determined for federal estate tax purposes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the estate receive extra time to allocate the decedent's GST exemption to the trust?
  • Outcome: Approved, with a 120-day extension from the date of the ruling.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631 and 2642(g)(1); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201834005
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/24/2018
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2632.00-00, 2632.02-00,
7701.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------, ID No. ------------------ ----------------------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------
--------------------
-----------------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B01
Re: ------------------------------------------ PLR-103785-18 Date:
May 14, 2018

LEGEND

Decedent = -----------------------------

Personal
Representative = -------------------------

CPA = --------------------------

Trust = -----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------

Date = ---------------------------

Year = --------

Dear -----------------:

This letter responds to your Personal Representative’s letter of January 29, 2018, requesting an extension of time under § 301.9100 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations and § 2642 of the Internal Revenue Code to allocate the generation- skipping transfer (GST) exemption to a trust.

FACTS

The facts and representations submitted are summarized as follows: Decedent died
PLR-103785-18
2

testate on Date. Decedent’s estate included the assets in Trust. Trust has GST potential.

CPA prepared and timely filed a Form 706, United States Estate (and Generation- Skipping Transfer) Tax Return for Year. However, CPA failed to allocate Decedent’s available GST exemption to Trust.

Personal Representative of Decedent’s estate requests an extension of time under
§ 2642(g)(1) and § 301.9100-1 to allocate Decedent’s available GST exemption to Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer. A generation- skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate.

Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the GST tax, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

Section 2641(a) defines the applicable rate as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

Under § 2642(a), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a GST is the excess (if any) of one over the applicable fraction. The applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust, and the denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the trust.

Section 2642(b)(2)(A) provides that if property is transferred as a result of the death of the transferor, the value of such property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of chapter 11; except that, if the requirements prescribed by the Secretary respecting allocation of post-death changes in value are not met, the value of such property shall be determined as of the time of the distribution concerned. Section 2642(b)(2)(B) provides that any allocation to property transferred as a result of the death of the transferor shall be effective on and after the date of the death of the transferor.
PLR-103785-18
3

Section 2642(b)(4) provides that if the value of property is included in the estate of a spouse by virtue of § 2044, and if such spouse is treated as the transferor of such property under § 2652(a), the value of such property for purposes of subsection (a) shall be its value for purposes of chapter 11 in the estate of such spouse.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of this paragraph.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that, under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute and taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) under the provisions of
§ 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and not expressly provided by statute).

Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.
PLR-103785-18
4

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Personal Representative of Decedent’s estate, is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate Decedent’s available GST exemption to the Year transfer to Trust. The allocation will be effective as of the respective date of the transfer to Trust and the value of the transfer to Trust as determined for federal estate tax purposes will be used in determining the amount of Decedent’s GST exemption to be allocated to Trust.

This allocation should be made on a supplemental Form 706 and filed with the Cincinnati Service Center at the following address: Internal Revenue Service, Cincinnati Service Center — Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to the supplemental Forms 709.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Except as specifically ruled herein, we express or imply no opinion on the federal tax consequences of the transaction under the cited provisions or under any other provisions of the Code.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Lorraine E. Gardner
______
By: Lorraine E. Gardner
Senior Counsel, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs & Special Industries)
Enclosures

Copy for section 6110 purposes
Copy of this letter

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace