Private Letter Ruling 201834002 Released August 24, 2018 Approved

Grants late GST allocations for pre-2001 trust transfers

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Two taxpayers established an irrevocable trust for their children and descendants, then made additional community-property transfers to it in a year ending on or before December 31, 2000. Their accounting firm did not prepare gift tax returns reporting the later transfers and therefore did not allocate either taxpayer's generation-skipping transfer exemption. The IRS found that the taxpayers qualified for discretionary relief because they had reasonably relied on a tax professional. It granted each taxpayer 120 days to file a Form 709 allocating GST exemption to that taxpayer's share of the transfers. The allocations would take effect on the original transfer dates and use the transferred property's value as finally determined for federal gift tax purposes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayers make late GST exemption allocations to their pre-2001 transfers to the trust?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 120 days to file the respective Forms 709.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2631, 2632, and 2642(g)(1); Treas. Reg. §§ 26.2632-1 and 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201834002 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/24/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
---------------------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------ Telephone Number:
------------------------------ ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CCS:PSI:4
PLR-101011-18
Date:
May 21, 2018

Legend

Taxpayers = --------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------
Trust = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accounting Firm = ------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------

Dear --------------------------------------:

   This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated

December 14, 2017, and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time
under § 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) and § 301.9100-3 of the
Procedure and Administration Regulations to allocate Taxpayers’ respective generation-
skipping transfer (GST) exemptions to their respective Year 2 transfers to Trust.

FACTS

     The facts and representations submitted are as follows:

   In Year 1, a year ending on or before December 31, 2000, Taxpayers established

Trust, an irrevocable trust, for the primary benefit of their children and issue. Taxpayers
funded Trust with community property interests. In Year 2, also a year ending on or
before December 31, 2000, Taxpayers transferred other community property interests
to Trust. Trust has GST potential.

   In Year 2, Taxpayers retained Accounting Firm to prepare Forms 709, United

States Gift (and Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Returns. Accounting Firm failed to
prepare Year 2 Forms 709 to report Taxpayers’ respective Year 2 transfers to Trust
and, therefore, failed to allocate GST exemption to these transfers.
PLR-101011-18 2

   It is represented that Taxpayers each had sufficient GST exemption to allocate to

his or her respective Year 2 transfer to Trust 1.

RULING REQUESTED

   Taxpayers request the Commissioner to grant an extension of time under

§ 2642(g)(1) of the Code and Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100.1 and 301.9100.3 to allocate
the Taxpayers’ respective GST exemption with respect to their Year 2 transfers made to
Trust so that (1) the allocations will be effective as of the date of the Year 2 transfers;
and (2) the amount of the GST exemption allocated to Trust and the inclusion ratio of
Trust will be determined based on the value of the transfers to Trust as determined for
federal gift tax purposes.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

    Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as

(1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

   Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax is the taxable amount multiplied

by the “applicable rate.” Section 2641(a) defines applicable rate as the product of the
maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect to the transfer.

    Under § 2642(a)(1), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in

a GST is generally defined as the excess (if any) of 1 over the “applicable fraction.” The
applicable fraction, as defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is
the amount of the GST exemption allocated to the trust (or to property transferred in a
direct skip), and the denominator of which is the value of the property transferred to the
trust or involved in the direct skip, reduced by the sum of any federal estate tax or state
death tax actually recovered from the trust attributable to such property and any
charitable deduction allowed under § 2055 or § 2522 with respect to such property.

   Section 2631(a) provides that, for purposes of determining the inclusion ratio,

every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption amount which may be allocated by
such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to which such individual is
the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation under § 2631(a), once
made, is irrevocable.

   Section 26.2632-1(b)(4)(i) of the Generation Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations

provides, in part, that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor's lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

  Section 2642(b) provides that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the allocation of

the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a timely filed gift tax return
PLR-101011-18 3

or is deemed to be made under § 2632(b)(1) or (c)(1), the value of such property for
purposes of § 2632(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes of
chapter 12, and such allocation shall be effective on and after the date of such transfer.
If property is transferred as a result of the death of the transferor, the value of such
property for purposes of § 2632(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes
of chapter 11, and such allocation shall be effective on and after the due date of the
death of the transferor.

   Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides, generally, that the Secretary shall, by regulation,

prescribe such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be
granted to make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1). Such
regulations shall include procedures for requesting comparable relief with respect to
transfers made before the date of the enactment of § 2642(g)(1)(A).

   Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief, the

Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including evidence of intent
contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such other factors as the
Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to grant relief, the time
for making the allocation shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

    Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time

for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers is to be treated as if not expressly
prescribed by statute. The Notice further provides that taxpayers may seek an
extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under the provisions
of § 301.9100-3.

    Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a

reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than 6 months except
in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue
Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

   Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant

an extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation
(and not expressly provided by statute). Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election
includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal
Revenue Bulletin. In accordance with § 2642(g)(1)(b) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers
may seek an extension of time to make an allocation described in § 2642(b)(1) under
the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

   Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer

provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.
PLR-101011-18 4

   Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted

reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

   Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that

the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly, Taxpayers are
granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate their
respective GST exemptions to their respective Year 2 transfers to Trust. The
allocations will be effective on the respective dates of the transfers and are based on
the value of the transferred property as finally determined for purposes of chapter 12.

  Taxpayers should allocate their respective GST exemptions on Forms 709 for

Year 2. The Forms 709 should be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to each Form 709.
A copy of this letter is enclosed for this purpose.

   Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

     In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this

letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

                                  Lorraine E. Gardner
                              By: ______________________________
                                  Lorraine E. Gardner
                                  Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

   Copy for § 6110 purposes
   Copy of this letter

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.