Determination Letter 201833025 Released August 17, 2018 Revocation Transcribed from scan

Revokes commercialized social club exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The IRS revoked the section 501(c)(7) exemption of a social club that operated alongside a taxable restaurant and bar. The public could purchase alcohol without becoming members or paying dues, the club shared premises and staff with the restaurant, and the restaurant received the alcohol-sale receipts. The IRS concluded that the club functioned as an integral part of a commercial enterprise rather than substantially for members' pleasure and recreation. It also found that the club exceeded the permitted level of public-use income and kept none of the nonmember-use records required by Revenue Procedure 71-17. The revocation was effective January 1 of a redacted year.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Did the club continue to qualify under section 501(c)(7) after opening its facilities and alcohol sales to the public?
  • Outcome: Revocation, effective January 1 of a redacted year.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 501(a) and 501(c)(7); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(7)-1; Rev. Proc. 71-17; Public Law 94-568

Full text (IRS public release)

[Redaction note: the IRS release blanks the club's identity, related restaurant and company names, people, state, city, county, dates, amounts, percentages, permit details, and other identifying information. The IRS also deleted a diagram and charts.]

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service
TE/GE EO Examinations
1100 Commerce Street MC 4920 DAL
Dallas, TX 75242

TAX EXEMPT AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITIES Date: MAY 01 2018
DIVISION
Number: 201833025 Person to Contact:
Release Date: 8/17/2018 Identification Number:

Contact Telephone Number:
In Reply Refer to:
EIN:

LAST DATE FOR FILING A PETITION
WITH THE TAX COURT:

UIL Code: 501.03-00

CERTIFIED MAIL - Return Receipt Requested
Dear

This is a Final Adverse Determination Letter as to your exempt status under section
501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). The denial of your tax-exempt status under
IRC section 501(c)(7) is effective January 1, 20XX.

Our adverse determination was made for the following reasons:

You have not established that you are operated substantially for pleasure
and recreation of its members or other non-profitable purposes and no part
of the earnings inures to the benefit of private shareholder within the
meaning of IRC section 501(c)(7).

You have made your services, use of recreational and social facilities
available to the general public. You have exceeded the non-member
income test for tax year ending December 31, 20XX.

You failed to keep and maintain books and records as required by Rev.
Proc. 71-17.

You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Form 1120. These returns should be
filed with the appropriate Service Center for the year ending December 31, 20XX and for
all years thereafter.

Processing of income tax returns and assessment of any taxes due will not be delayed should
a petition for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Internal Revenue
Code.

If you decide to contest this determination in court, you must initiate a suit for declaratory
judgment in the United States Tax Court, the United States Claim Court or the District
Court of the United States for the District of Columbia before the 91st day after the date this
determination was mailed to you. Contact the clerk of the appropriate court for the rules for
initiating suits for declaratory judgment.

The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS that
can help protect your taxpayer rights. We can offer you help if your tax problem is causing a
hardship, or you've tried but haven't been able to resolve your problem with the IRS. If you
qualify for our assistance, which is always free, we will do everything possible to help you.
Visit taxpayeradvocate.irs.gov or call 1-877-777-4778.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are
shown in the heading of this letter.

Sincerely yours,

Maria Hooke
Director, Exempt Organizations Examinations
Enclosures:
Publication 892

Department of the Treasury Date:

Internal Revenue Service September 11, 2017
IRS Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division Taxpayer Identification Number:
Form:

Tax year(s) ended:

Person to contact / ID number:

Contact numbers:
Phone Number:

Fax Number:
Manager's name / ID number:

Manager's contact number:
Phone Number:
Response due date:

Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested
Dear

Why you are receiving this letter
We propose to revoke your status as an organization described in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code). Enclosed is our report of examination explaining the proposed action.

What you need to do if you agree

If you agree with our proposal, please sign the enclosed Form 6018, Consent to Proposed Action — Section
7428, and return it to the contact person at the address listed above (unless you have already provided us a
signed Form 6018). We'll issue a final revocation letter determining that you aren't an organization described in
section 501(c)(3).

After we issue the final revocation letter, we’ll announce that your organization is no longer eligible for
contributions deductible under section 170 of the Code.

If we don't hear from you

If you don't respond to this proposal within 30 calendar days from the date of this letter, we'll issue a final
revocation letter. Failing to respond to this proposal will adversely impact your legal standing to seek a
declaratory judgment because you failed to exhaust your administrative remedies.

Effect of revocation status
If you receive a final revocation letter, you'll be required to file federal income tax returns for the tax year(s)
shown above as well as for subsequent tax years.

What you need to do if you disagree with the proposed revocation
If you disagree with our proposed revocation, you may request a meeting or telephone conference with the
supervisor of the IRS contact identified in the heading of this letter. You also may file a protest with the

IRS Appeals office by submitting a written request to the contact person at the address listed above within 30
calendar days from the date of this letter. The Appeals office is independent of the Exempt Organizations
division and resolves most disputes informally.

For your protest to be valid, it must contain certain specific information including a statement of the facts, the
applicable law, and arguments in support of your position. For specific information needed for a valid protest,
please refer to page one of the enclosed Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-Exempt Status,
and page six of the enclosed Publication 3498, The Examination Process. Publication 3498 also includes
information on your rights as a taxpayer and the IRS collection process. Please note that Fast Track Mediation
referred to in Publication 3498 generally doesn’t apply after we issue this letter.

You also may request that we refer this matter for technical advice as explained in Publication 892. Please
contact the individual identified on the first page of this letter if you are considering requesting technical
advice. If we issue a determination letter to you based on a technical advice memorandum issued by the Exempt
Organizations Rulings and Agreements office, no further IRS administrative appeal will be available to you.

Contacting the Taxpayer Advocate Office is a taxpayer right

You have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Their assistance isn’t a substitute for
established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer Advocate can't reverse a legally
correct tax determination or extend the time you have (fixed by law) to file a petition in a United States court.
They can, however, see that a tax matter that hasn't been resolved through normal channels gets prompt and
proper handling. You may call toll-free 1-877-777-4778 and ask for Taxpayer Advocate assistance. If you
prefer, you may contact your local Taxpayer Advocate at:

Internal Revenue Service
Office of the Taxpayer Advocate

For additional information

If you have any questions, please call the contact person at the telephone number shown in the heading of this
letter. If you write, please provide a telephone number and the most convenient time to call if we need to
contact you.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Sincerely,

Maria Hooke
Director, EO Examinations

Enclosures:

Report of Examination
Form 6018
Publication 892
Publication 3498

Form 886-A
(Rev. January 1994)

EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS

ISSUE:

Whether continues to qualify for exemption under Internal Revenue

Code (IRC) §501(c)(7)?
FACTS:

filed Form 202, Certificate of Formation Nonprofit Corporation, with
the Secretary of State for the State of on October 28, 20XX. Their purpose is to operate a
private club for recreation. The form stated that the club would only be supported by
membership dues with all receipts going to expenses. The form was organized and executed
by 20XX. The Directors of the organization are: , and
. The club was granted §501(c)(7) exempt status November 1, 20XX.

The Registered Agent for is . filed Form
205, Certificate of Formation Limited Liability Company, with the Secretary of State for the State
of on October 21, 20XX. The Registered Agent and Governing Authority is . The
company was formed to operate a restaurant. The Secretary of State reports that

is the Registered Agent of and .

The Franchise Tax Public Information Report list 20XX as the Officer of

for 20XX through 20XX.

The Club signed a Management Services Agreement with on November
1, 20XX. The Agreement was to be effective for one year and would automatically be renewed if
both parties agreed. would provide the following services:

• Use of employee time for purpose of serving and complying with all certifications
• Use of point of sale system for tracking sales to members

• Use of utilities

• Use of supplies, office and machines

• Use of entertainment

leases space for at from
signed a sublease agreement with on November 6, 20XX allowing the
club access to the space. The agreement requires the Club to pay a monthly rental of

0% of the gross revenue derived from the service charge of alcoholic beverages.

For the leased space, there is one entrance for Club members and another entrance for Café
customers. Once inside the premises, the examiner didn’t note a barrier separating the 0
entities or anything other than the entrances that distinguished the restaurant from the bar (see
diagram).

DIAGRAM DELETED

was selected for examination on January 13, 20XX with the following
potential issues:

  1. Non-member and investment income-exemption or unrelated business income (UBI)

  2. Missing Form 990-T, Exempt Organization Business Income Tax Return

  3. Missing Form 1099

During the examination, 20XX, provided the history of the Club.

operates (originally ). County was unable to
sell alcoholic beverages in 20XX, per . She stated that told her that a private club
could not be for profit. was formed as a neighborhood club for
residents of and County. The membership dues were $0 for the initial visit

and was good for 0 days. The member’s driving license was swiped each visit to prevent
nonmembers from receiving alcohol. Nonmembers were allowed temporary membership
(Charter Member) for a day by paying dues of $0. No records were maintained as required by
Revenue Procedure 71-17.

For the year under examination, 20XX, County allowed the sale of alcohol. The Club
still had members but they didn’t have to pay membership dues. Nonmembers (the public)
could also purchase alcohol without becoming a member and paying dues. The Club was
operating as a commercial establishment.

Audit issue No. 1, questioned whether the reported revenue was from nonmember sources or
investments. This issue pertains to the gross receipts test for a 501(c)(7) organization. A
501(c)(7) organization can receive up to 35% of their gross receipts, including investment
income, from sources outside their membership without losing their exempt status. Within the
35%, not more than 15% should come from the use of the social club’s facilities or services by
the public (nonmembers). The Club’s Form 990 didn't indicate the source of income other than
that it was Program Service Revenue. stated that the Club’s income came solely from
the sale of alcohol to their members. As explained above, in 20XX, the Club wasn’t charging
membership dues to the County residents, or any of the visitors to the establishment.

Audit issue No. 2, mentions investment-type income with no Form 990-T filed. This issue is the
subsequent action required if the Club had unrelated business income.

Audit issue No. 3, states that there was compensation and Form 1099 wasn't filed. The Club
reported Management fees of $0. stated that the Management fees were for

. She said she wasn't aware of the requirement to file and issue a Form 1099. She said the
income was included because she prepared the returns for all companies (

; , and ).

website lists the kitchen’s hours of operation.

Form 886-A EXPLANATIONS OF ITEMS
(Rev. January 1994)
Monday and Tuesday ------------------- 5pm-9pm
Wednesday ----------------- 11am-2pm & 5pm-10pm
Thursday ------------------ 11am-2pm & 5pm-9:30pm
Friday -------------------- 11am-2pm & 5pm-10pm
Saturday and Sunday ------- 11am-10pm

The bars hours of operation were posted in the facility.

Bar Hours

Wednesday - Friday, Sunday......... 11am-12am
Saturday............................ 11am-1am
Monday - Tuesday.................... 3pm-12am

The website lists available features and activities:

0 Flat Screen TVs

0” Projection Screen TV
Golden Tee

Poker

Pool

Darts

Cornhole

BuzzTime Trivia

Live Trivia

Video Poker

The Café’s online calendar lists activities and specials on alcoholic beverages.

Margaritas $.0

Draft 12 oz. $0 (Tuesdays) & $0 (Sundays)
Crown & Down $0

Margaritas & Cosmos $.0

Wells & Shot specials $.0

Bloody Mary’s & Mimosas $0

CHART DELETED

CHART DELETED
liquor license ( ) was issued January 27, 20XX and expires
January 26, 20XX. It’s for the premises of . The Club has the
following permits from the ( ):

FB - FOOD AND BEVERAGE CERTIFICATE - A Food and Beverage Certificate may
be issued to the holder of a Beer Retailer's On-Premise Permit or Wine and Beer
Retailer's Permit if food service is the primary business being operated on the licensed
premise or to the holder of a Mixed Beverage Permit or Private Club Permit if food
service is available on the premises and the gross receipts of alcoholic beverages do not
exceed 50% of total gross receipts. The holder must meet requirements of the Code and
Rule 33.5 concerning minimum number of entrees served, hours of service, etc.
Certificate allows holder to be exempt from posting a conduct surety bond.

PE - BEVERAGE CARTAGE PERMIT - Permit authorizes a Mixed Beverage, Private
Club Registration, Private Club Wine and Beer or Private Club Exemption Certificate
permittee who holds this permit to transport alcoholic beverages to the licensed
premises from the place of purchase.

LAW:

§501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code exempts from income tax clubs organized for pleasure,
recreation, and other nonprofitable purposes, substantially all the activities of which are for such
purposes and no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private
shareholder.

§1.501(c)(7)-1(a) of the Federal Tax Regulations states that the exemption provided by section
501(a) for organizations described in section 501(c)(7) applies only to clubs which are organized
and operated exclusively for pleasure, recreation, and other nonprofitable purposes, but does
not apply to any club if any part of its net earnings inures to the benefit of any private
shareholder. In general, this exemption extends to social and recreation clubs which are
supported solely by membership fees, dues, and assessments. However, a club otherwise
entitled to exemption will not be disqualified because it raises revenue from members through
the use of club facilities or in connection with club activities.

§1.501(c)(7)-1(b) of the Federal Tax Regulations states that a club which engages in business,
such as making its social and recreational facilities available to the general public or by selling
real estate, timber, or other products, is not organized and operated exclusively for pleasure,
recreation, and other nonprofitable purposes, and is not exempt under section 501 (a).
Solicitation by advertisement or otherwise for public patronage of its facilities is prima facie
evidence that the club is engaging in business and is not being operated exclusively for
pleasure, recreation, or social purposes.

Public Law 94-568 provides that social clubs are permitted to receive up to 35% of their gross
receipts from sources outside of their membership without losing their tax-exempt status, and
that within that 35%, not more than 15% of gross receipts should be derived from the use of a
social club’s facilities or services by the general public.

In Spokane Motorcycle Club v. United States, 222 F.Supp. 151, the court ruled that
refreshments, goods, and services furnished to members of a charitable, nonprofit corporation
from business enterprise net profits constituted benefits inuring to individual members, and,
therefore, corporation was not exempt from federal income tax. Judge Powell further stated,
“But it is clear that when a club, otherwise exempt, engages in a business from which it derives
profits from outside sources wholly disproportionate to its nontaxable purposes, and such profits
inure to the benefit of its members in the nature of permanent improvements and facilities, it
loses its exempt status under the definitive provisions of the statute. It should be noted that to
be exempt from taxation, the club must not only be organized exclusively for pleasure,
recreation and other nonprofitable purposes, but it must be operated exclusively for those
purposes as well.”

In Aviation Club of Utah v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 162 F.2d 984, the court upheld
the position taken by the tax court in a previous ruling whereby the income received by the club
from non-exempt activities was so disproportionate to the income received from exempt
purposes that the club lost its exempt status. Judge Murrah invoked the same concept as that
in Spokane Motorcycle Club v. United States, whereby if a club engages in a business from
which it derives profits from outside sources wholly disproportionate to nontaxable purposes,
and such profits inure to the benefit of its members in the nature of permanent improvements
and facilities, the club loses its exempt status.

In Revenue Ruling 65-63, 1965-1 CB 240 an organization conducts various sports car events
for the pleasure and recreation of its members and their guests. The events end up attracting
the general public. The general public is admitted on a recurring basis upon payment of an
admission fee. Public patronage is solicited by advertising. The Service ruled that public
patronage or participation in club activities is permissible if incidental to and in furtherance of the
club purposes, and if the net income therefrom does not inure to its members. Here however,
the activities of the club, in permitting public patronage of its facilities, are of such a magnitude
and recurrence as to constitute engaging in business and the club uses the income derived
therefrom to acquire additional assets and to pay club expenses normally borne by its members.
It was thus held that the organization in the instant case does not qualify for exemption under
§501(c)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code.

In Revenue Ruling 68-119, 1968-1 C.B. 268 an equestrian social club that holds an annual one-
day steeplechase meet which is open to the general public is found to be tax-exempt under IRC
501(c)(7). In this case, the club is said to derive a small amount of income from nonmembers in
excess of expenses attributable to their participation and attendance. If any profit results, it is
turned over to charity. Other club activities are supported by member dues. Therefore, the
ruling holds, the income from non-members does not inure to the club’s members.

In T.C. Memo 1962-18, Clements Buckaroos vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the
organization has managed and promoted an annual one-day public event in the nature of a
rodeo. All of the entry fees of the contestants with other funds of the organization are used for
the payment of prize money for participants in the various events. There is no profit to the
organization from such fees. In ruling that the organization is exempt from income tax, the
judge specified that “traffic with outsiders was purely incidental”. The judge also added that “It
would, of course, be possible for the rodeo activities to become so preponderant that they could
no longer be viewed as merely incidental’.

In Augusta Golf Association, Inc. vs. United States, 338 F.Supp. 272, the court ruled, among
other things, that the Association was exempt from federal income tax as a social club, despite
practically all of the Association’s income having been derived from “Calcutta” pools participated
in by non-members. In the instant case, the social affairs at which the Calcuttas were featured
were open only to members and their invited guests. The Association took a cut of 10% of the
gross amount raised in these pools.

Rev. Rul. 58-589, 1958-2CB 266 examines the criteria for determining whether an organization
qualifies for exemption under IRC section 501(a) as an organization described in section
501(c)(7) of the Code. This ruling states it is clear under the foregoing regulations that a club
which engages in business, such as making its social and recreational facilities available to the
public or by selling real estate, etc., may not be considered as being organized and operated
exclusively for pleasure, recreation or social purposes. It is equally clear that the solicitation by
advertisements or otherwise of public patronage of its facilities may be averse to the
establishment of an exempt status.

Rev. Proc. 71-17, 1971 WL 26186, 1971-1 C.B. 683 sets forth guidelines for determining the
effect gross receipts derived from use of a social club's facilities by the public have on the club's
exemption from federal income tax under section 501(c)(7) of the Code.

The club must maintain books and records of each such use and the amount derived therefrom.
This requirement applies even though the member pays initially for such use. In each instance
the record must contain the following information:

  1. The date;

  2. The total number in the party;

  3. The number of nonmembers in the party;

  4. The total charges;

  5. The charges attributable to nonmembers;

  6. The charges paid by nonmembers;

  7. Where a member pays all or part of the charges attributable to nonmembers, a statement
    signed by the member indicating whether he has been or will be reimbursed for such
    nonmember use and, if so, the amount of the reimbursement;

  8. Where the member's employer reimburses the member or makes direct payment to the club
    for the charges attributable to nonmembers, a statement signed by the member indicating the

name of his employer; the amount of the payment attributable to the nonmember use; the
nonmember's name and business or other relationship to the member; and the business,
personal, or social purpose of the member served by the nonmember use.

  1. Where a nonmember, other than the employer of the member, makes payment to the club or
    reimburses a member and a claim is made that the amount was paid gratuitously for the benefit
    of a member, a statement signed by the member indicating the donor's name and relationship to
    the member, and containing information to substantiate the gratuitous nature of the payments or
    reimbursement.

Exceptions to these records keeping requirements are:

  1. Where a group of eight or fewer individuals, at least one of whom is a member, uses
    club facilities, it will be assumed for audit purposes that the nonmembers are the
    guests of the member, provided payment for such use is received by the club directly
    from the member or the member's employer.

  2. Where 75 percent or more of a group using club facilities are members, it will
    likewise be assumed for audit purposes that the nonmembers in the group are
    guests of members, provided payment for such use is received by the club directly
    from one or more of the members or the member's employer.

  3. Solely for purposes of 1 and 2, above, payment by a member's employer will be
    assumed to be for a use that serves a direct business objective of the employee-
    member.

Where a club makes its facilities available to the public to a substantial degree, the club is not
operated exclusively for pleasure, recreation, or other non-profitable purposes.

TAXPAYER’S POSITION:

Taxpayer's position has not been provided.

GOVERNMENT’S POSITION:

Based on the examination, does not qualify for exemption as a social
club as described in IRC §501(c)(7) and Treas. Reg. §1.501(c)(7) which extends exemptions to
social and recreation clubs which are supported solely by membership fees, dues, and
assessments. The Club is operated as a commercial venture and is an integral part of

, a taxable organization.

The organization’s treatment of nonmembers (or the public) is inconsistent with the term "club"
as used in IRC 501(c)(7) and disqualifies it from exemption. The membership requirements are
vaguely stated and there are no dues or initiation charges. As per Revenue Procedure 71-17,
without records of non-member sales, all income from alcohol sales can be assumed to be from
non-members.

The registered agent of is , who owns and

operates . is listed as the sole member of and is an officer

of . The registered agent has close physical and financial ties to club

activities. The cafe serves the club's members as well as its own patrons in the restaurant
that’s within the shared premises. All waitresses, bartenders, and other persons working at the
club are employees of the café. All receipts from the alcoholic beverages are received directly
by the café and its personnel.

is a taxable organization that controls the Club through the control it has over the
governing body. uses this control to carry on a commercial enterprise by providing
entertainment and services to not only the Club and its members but to the customers of the
café.

The Food and Beverage Certificate from states that the holder (the Club) must meet the
requirements of the Code and Rule 33.5 concerning minimum number of entrees served, hours
of service, etc. Rule 33.5 states that the primary business on the premises is food
services and it would be the responsibility of the license holder (the Club) to provide financial
and accounting records related to food and alcohol sales of all business entities sharing the
licensed premise. The Cafe permits unrestricted use of its facilities by the public and advertises
to that effect. The Club has an open liquor license allowing them to serve the public without a
restriction to serve club members only. This further illustrates how the Club was an integral
part of the Café.

CONCLUSION:
From the information described above, organized the Club to sell alcoholic beverages in
the city of and County to serve alcoholic beverages as an integral part of

their restaurant business. The club is not organized and operated exclusively for pleasure,
recreation, and other nonprofitable purposes. Accordingly, it does not qualify for exemption
under section 501(c)(7) of the Code and should be revoked.

The proposed date of the revocation is January 1, 20XX.

Form 1120, U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return should be filed for 20XX and thereafter as long
as the organization continues to be subject to income tax.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.