Grants extension for omitted section 754 election

Plain-English summary

A partnership failed to include a section 754 election with its return for the year an individual partner died. The partnership represented that the omission was inadvertent, that it acted reasonably and in good faith, and that relief would not prejudice the government. The IRS granted 120 days to file the election under the section 9100 regulations. The relief requires consistent returns for all open years and basis adjustments to partnership property and partner interests as though the election had been timely made.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could a partnership obtain extra time to make a section 754 basis-adjustment election omitted from a timely filed return?
• Outcome: Approved, subject to filing and basis-adjustment conditions within 120 days.
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 734(b), 743(b), and 754; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.754-1(b) and 301.9100-1 through -3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201833007 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 8/17/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 9100.15-00, 754.02-00
Person To Contact:
--------------------------- -----------------------, ID # ----------------------
----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------- Telephone Number:
--------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B03
PLR-103175-18
Date:
May 15, 2018

LEGEND

X = ---------------------------
-------------------

State = ---------------

A = -----------------------

              ---------------------------------------------------
              -----------------

D1 = ---------------------------

Dear --------------------:

  This letter responds to a letter dated January 17, 2018, and additional

correspondence, submitted on behalf of X requesting an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file an election under
§ 754 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

                                            FACTS

  According to the information submitted, X is a State limited partnership classified

as a partnership for federal tax purposes. A, an individual partner, died in the year
ending D1. X’s return for the taxable year ended D1 was filed, but a § 754 election to
PLR-103175-18 2

adjust the basis of partnership property was inadvertently not filed with the return. X
represents that it has acted reasonably and in good faith and that granting relief will not
prejudice the interests of the government.

                        LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 754 provides that a partnership may elect to adjust the basis of

partnership property when there is a distribution of property or a transfer of a
partnership interest. An election under § 754 applies with respect to all distributions of
property by the partnership and to all transfers of interests in the partnership during the
taxable year with respect to which the election was filed and all subsequent taxable
years.

    Section 1.754-1(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provides that an election

under § 754 to adjust the basis of partnership property under §§ 734(b) and 743(b), with
respect to a distribution of property to a partner or a transfer of an interest in a
partnership, must be made in a written statement filed with the partnership return for the
taxable year during which the distribution or transfer occurs. For the election to be
valid, the return must be filed not later than the time prescribed by § 1.6031(a)-1(e)
(including extensions) for filing the return for such taxable year.

    Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner may grant a reasonable extension of

time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Code except
subtitles E, G, H, and I. Section 301.9100-1(b) provides that the term “regulatory
election” includes an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation published in
the Federal Register.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for regulatory elections that
do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

   Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in
§ 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer
acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests
of the Government.

                        CONCLUSION

  Based solely upon the facts submitted and the representations made, we

conclude that the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied.
PLR-103175-18 3

As a result, X is granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to
make a § 754 election for its taxable year ended D1 and thereafter. The election should
be made in a written statement filed with the applicable service center for association
with X’s return for its taxable year ended D1. A copy of this letter should be attached to
the statement filed.

   This ruling is contingent on X and its partners filing within 120 days of this letter

all required returns for all open years consistent with the requested relief. Any
depreciation deduction allowable for an open year is to be computed based upon the
remaining useful life and using property basis as adjusted by the greater of any
depreciation deduction allowed or allowable in any prior year had the § 754 election
been timely made.

    Additionally, as a condition of this ruling, X must adjust the basis of its properties

to reflect any § 734(b) or 743(b) adjustments that would have been made if the § 754
election had been timely made. These basis adjustments must reflect any additional
depreciation that would have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely
made, regardless of whether the statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a
claim for refund has expired for any year subject to this grant of late relief. Additionally,
the partners of X must adjust the basis of their interests in X to reflect what that basis
would be if the § 754 election had been timely made, regardless of whether the
statutory period of limitation on assessment or filing a claim for refund has expired for
any year subject to this grant of late relief. Specifically, the partners of X must reduce
the basis of their interests in X in the amount of any additional depreciation that would
have been allowable if the § 754 election had been timely made.

   Except for the specific ruling above, we express or imply no opinion concerning

the federal tax consequences of the facts of this case under any other provision of the
Code. In addition, § 301.9100-1(a) provides that the granting of an extension of time for
making an election is not a determination that the taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make
the election.

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. According to

§ 6110(k)(3), this ruling may not be used or cited as precedent.

    Under a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a copy of this

letter to X’s authorized representative.
PLR-103175-18 4

   The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        Associate Chief Counsel
                                        (Passthroughs & Special Industries)



                                     By:_/s/____________________________
                                        Richard T. Probst
                                        Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
                                        Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                        (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)

  Copy of this letter
  Copy of this letter for section 6110 purposes