Private Letter Ruling 201829001 Released July 20, 2018 Approved

Tax-book asset method approved for interest apportionment

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A domestic parent of a consolidated group had long used the fair-market-value method to value assets when apportioning interest expense. Maintaining that method created substantial administrative work, professional fees, and staff costs, so the group requested permission to switch to tax-book value. Because a taxpayer that adopts fair-market value generally cannot change without IRS consent, the ruling was necessary. The IRS allowed the group to use tax-book value beginning with the specified tax year and for all later years and operative Code sections, including Sections 199 and 904.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the consolidated group change from fair-market value to tax-book value when apportioning interest expense?
  • Outcome: Yes, beginning with the specified tax year and continuing thereafter.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 864(e); Temp. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8T(c)(2), 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201829001 [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 7/20/2018 Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 9413.03-02
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------------- ----------------------, ID No. ------------------
------------------------------ Telephone Number:
--------------------- ----------------------
----------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B03
PLR-109855-18
Date:
April 25, 2018

              TY:--------

Corp X = ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------
Date 1 = -----------------------
Date 2 = -----------------------

Dear -----------------:

This is in response to your letter dated January 17, 2018, requesting a ruling that Corp
X and its subsidiaries be permitted to change from the fair market value method to the
tax book method of asset valuation for purposes of apportioning interest expense.
Additional information was submitted in a letter dated April 19, 2018.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by Corp X and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

Corp X, a domestic corporation, is a fiscal year taxpayer that uses the accrual method
as its overall method of accounting. Corp X is the common parent of a group of
affiliated corporations that files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Corp X
has used the fair market value method of asset valuation since the tax year beginning
Date 1.

Corp X wishes to change to the tax book value method because complying with the fair
market value method requirements has resulted in Corp X incurring undue
administrative burden and significant costs both in terms of professional fees and time
spent by Corp X personnel.
PLR-109855-18 2

Section 864(e) provides that all allocations and apportionments of interest expense shall
be made on the basis of assets rather than gross income. Treas. Reg. §§1.861-8
through 1.861-12 and Temp. Treas. Reg. §§1.861-8T through 1.861-13T set forth the
rules specific to the allocation and apportionment of interest expense. Temp. Treas.
Reg. §1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii) provides that a taxpayer may elect to determine the value of its
assets on the basis of either tax book value or the fair market value of its assets. Temp.
Treas. Reg. §1.861-8T(c)(2) provides that, once a taxpayer uses the fair market value
method, the taxpayer and all related persons must continue to use such method unless
expressly authorized by the Commissioner to change methods.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, Corp X may
use the tax book value method of assets valuation for purposes of apportioning interest
expense, pursuant to Temp. Treas. Reg. §§1.861-8T(c)(2) and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii),
starting from its tax year beginning on Date 2 and for all subsequent taxable years and
for all operative sections, including sections 199 and 904 of the Code, pursuant to
Treas. Reg. §1.861-8(f)(2).

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to Corp X and its subsidiaries. Section 6110(k)(3) of the
Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, if Corp X files it returns electronically it may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

                                    Sincerely,



                                    Michael I. Gilman
                                    Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 3
                                    Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                    (International)

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.