Ezel / IRS Rulings / 201827012
Chief Counsel Advice 201827012 Released July 6, 2018 Advice

Judicial approval protects specified principal residences from levy

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that judicial approval is required before the IRS levies property owned by a taxpayer and used as the principal residence of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, former spouse, or minor child. The advice distinguished the statute's term "principal residence" from "personal residence." It explained that Section 6334(a)(13)(A) protects residences in small-dollar cases, while Section 6334(a)(13)(B) protects principal residences subject to the judicial-approval exception in Section 6334(e). It also suggested that the regulation's express list of family members came from the conference report.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Whose use of taxpayer-owned property as a principal residence triggers the judicial-approval requirement before levy?
  • Outcome: Advice given: the protected users are the taxpayer, spouse, former spouse, and minor child listed in the regulation.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 6334(a)(13), 6334(e); Treas. Reg. § 301.6334-1(d)

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2018062013223420
UILC: 6334.00-00

Number: 201827012
Release Date: 7/6/2018
From:
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 1:22:35 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: One more thing! FW: IRC 6334 "personal residence" question

-------------.

Yes, the parties are the ones listed in the regs. As Treas Reg 301.6334-1(d) states,
judicial approval is needed prior to levy of property that is owned by the taxpayer and
used as the principal residence of the taxpayer, the taxpayer's spouse, the taxpayer's
former spouse, or the taxpayer's minor child. BTW, 6334(e) does not say “personal
residence”—it says “principal residence” which is a condensed version of “principal
residence of the taxpayer” used in 6334(a)(13)(B). Maybe that was the source of your
question? If you are asking why the regs include parties not specifically mentioned in
section 6334, I believe that language comes from the conference report.

I am not familiar with the training text you quoted, and I am not sure what’s troubling
about section 6334(a)(13), which addresses both residences in small dollar amounts
and principal residence seizures. Section 6334(a)(13)(A) exempts residences in small
dollar amount cases. Section 6334(a)(13)(B) exempts principal residences except as
provided in section 6334(e).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.