Use a closing agreement to resolve combat-zone interest in a Tax Court settlement
Apply this to your situation
This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Chief Counsel advised Appeals to use a closing agreement to resolve an interest issue involving Section 7508 combat-zone relief. The Tax Court normally lacks jurisdiction over deficiency interest, even though standard stipulated decisions state that interest will be assessed as provided by law. A closing agreement made as part of settling the deficiencies would resolve the interest issue immediately. The advice also said a separate email process was unnecessary because the IRS already had open communication with the taxpayer's representative.
Ruling snapshot
- Question: How should Appeals resolve the interest component of a combat-zone deficiency settlement pending in Tax Court?
- Outcome: Advice given to enter a closing agreement with the taxpayer.
- Key authorities: IRC §§ 6213(a), 7508; CCDM Exhibit 35.11.1-125
Full text (IRS public release)
ID: CCA_2018052509275153
UILC: 7508.00-00
Number: 201826010
Release Date: 6/29/2018
From:
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 9:27:51 AM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: RE: combat zone, § 7508 and interest
Hello ------------
We suggest that IRS Appeals to enter into a Closing Agreement with the taxpayer regarding the interest issue.
In Tax Court cases settled by Appeals, there is normally no agreement entered into regarding interest due on a deficiency, because the Tax Court does not have jurisdiction over interest. However, the standard Decision document in CCDM Exhibit 35.11.1-125 contains “below the line” stipulations that suggest interest is due and that it may be immediately assessed. Therefore, a Closing Agreement regarding interest as part of the settlement of the deficiencies looks like a good way to resolve the issue now.
These are the relevant below the line stipulations in an ordinary Tax Court Decision document:
It is stipulated that the Court may enter the foregoing decision.
It is further stipulated that interest will be assessed as provided by law on the deficiencies and additions to tax due from petitioner.
It is further stipulated that, effective upon the entry of the decision by the Court, petitioner waives the restriction contained in I.R.C. § 6213(a) prohibiting assessment and collection of the deficiencies and additions to tax (plus statutory interest) until the decision of the Tax Court has become final.
We don't see a need to use the email process. That's good for identifying affected taxpayers, but seems to serve no purpose when we already have open communication with the representative.
Hope that helps.
What does the Code say today, for your facts?
This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace