Private Letter Ruling 201826003 Released June 29, 2018 Approved

Converted coal-waste products are not subject to the coal excise tax

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer developed a process that converts commercially unusable coal waste into a fuel product and an agricultural product. The process substantially changes the waste's physical properties and chemical composition, and it does not extract coal. The IRS ruled that using the coal waste in the process and selling the resulting fuel product are not subject to the Section 4121 coal excise tax. Neither the waste nor the fuel product is coal in the commercial sense, and the taxpayer is not a producer of coal under the regulations.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Are the taxpayer's use of coal waste and sale of the converted fuel product taxable under Section 4121?
  • Outcome: Approved. Neither activity is subject to the coal excise tax.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 4121; Treas. Reg. § 48.4121-1(a)(1); Holmes Limestone v. U.S., 946 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ohio 1996)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201826003 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/29/2018 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 4121.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------------------------- --------------------------- -
-------------------------- ID No. ------------------
------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B07
PLR-130656-17
Date:
March 27, 2018

LEGEND

Taxpayer = --------------------------

Process = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------

Place = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------

Product 1 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Product 2 = --------------------------------------

Dear --------------:

  This letter responds to your letter ruling request dated September 27, 2017, and

subsequent communications, requesting rulings under § 4121 of the Internal Revenue
Code (the Code).
PLR-130656-17 2

FACTS

   According to the facts submitted, Taxpayer has developed Process to convert

coal waste from Place into Product 1, a fuel product, and Product 2, an agricultural
product. Process significantly alters the physical properties and chemical composition
of the coal waste such that Product 1 and Product 2 are physically and chemically
different from coal.

  The coal waste used in Process has no widespread commercial application.

Both Product 1 and Product 2 can be customized during the Process to meet the
demands of specific markets or customers.

RULINGS REQUESTED

Taxpayer requests the following rulings:

  1. Taxpayer’s conversion of coal waste into Product 1 and Product 2 is not a
    taxable use of coal by a producer under § 4121.

  2. Taxpayer’s sale of Product 1 is not a taxable sale of coal under § 4121.

LAW

  Section 4121(a) of the Code imposes a tax on coal from mines located in the

United States sold by the producer.

   Section 48.4121-1(a)(1) of the Manufacturers and Retailers Excise Tax

Regulations provides generally that the term “producer” means the person in whom is
vested ownership of the coal under state law immediately after the coal is severed from
the ground. The term also includes any person who extracts coal from coal waste
refuse piles or from the silt waste product that results from wet washing (or similar
processing) of coal. However, the excise tax does not apply to a producer who either
sells or uses the silt waste product without extracting the coal from it. Furthermore, the
excise tax does not apply to the sale or use of the silt waste product after any coal has
been extracted from it.

   The term “coal” is not defined in § 4121 or the regulations. In Holmes Limestone

v. U.S., 946 F.Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ohio 1996), aff’d, Nos. 97-3075 and 97-3129, 1998
U.S. App. LEXIS 26755 (6th Cir. 1998), the court noted that the term “coal” under
§ 4121 refers to coal in its commercial sense. The court further determined that “that
which is sold as coal is coal.”
PLR-130656-17 3

ANALYSIS & CONCLUSIONS

   Section 4121(a) imposes a tax on the sale or use of coal by a producer. In this

case, Taxpayer’s use of coal waste in Process and Taxpayer’s sale of Product 1 are
taxable only if (i) the coal waste or Product 1, as the case may be, is “coal” within the
meaning of § 4121(a), and (ii) Taxpayer is a producer within the meaning of § 4121(a).
In each instance, both prongs must be satisfied in order for tax to attach.

  As noted by the court in Holmes Limestone, the term “coal” means coal in the

commercial sense. Since the coal waste that Taxpayer uses as feedstock in Process is
not commercially saleable as coal, we conclude that it is not coal within the meaning of
§ 4121(a).

   Product 1 differs significantly in chemical composition from coal and may be

customized to meet consumer and market demands. In addition, Product 1 is not
commercially saleable as coal. For these reasons, we conclude that Product 1 is not
coal within the meaning of § 4121(a).

   Section 48.4121-1(a) provides that a “producer” of coal includes any person who

extracts coal from coal waste. Here, Process does not constitute extraction of coal from
coal waste. During Process, the coal waste undergoes a significant chemical change
which alters its physical and chemical properties such that the resulting Product 1 and
Product 2 are significantly different in physical and chemical composition from coal.
The chemical change occurs at the beginning of Process, and no coal is extracted at
any point in Process. Therefore, Taxpayer is not a producer of coal.

   Because the coal waste Taxpayer uses in Process is not coal, and because

Taxpayer is not a producer, we conclude that Taxpayer’s use of coal waste to produce
Product 1 and Product 2 is not subject to tax under § 4121(a). Further, because
Product 1 is not coal and Taxpayer is not a producer, we conclude that Taxpayer’s sale
of Product 1 is not subject to tax under § 4121(a).

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

   Except as specifically ruled herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning

the federal tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
referenced in this letter. In addition, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any variation of the process described herein.
PLR-130656-17 4

  This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of

the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

                                  Sincerely,

                                  Stephanie N. Bland

                                  Stephanie N. Bland
                                  Branch Chief, Branch 7
                                  Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
                                  (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosure

  Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.