Private Letter Ruling 201825024 Released June 22, 2018 Approved

Taxpayer could revoke a mistaken election out of installment reporting

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer used a qualified intermediary for a deferred exchange of real property that began late in one tax year and finished in the next. The accountant incorrectly believed that a Form 1099-S required the exchange's recognized gain to be reported in the first year, which effectively elected out of the Section 453 installment method. The taxpayer discovered the error during a later state tax examination and promptly requested IRS consent while filing a protective amended return. The IRS found that the request did not involve hindsight or a purpose of avoiding federal income tax. It permitted the taxpayer to revoke the election retroactively, report the taxable gain in the second year to the extent allowed by Section 453, and amend later returns for affected carryforwards. The ruling did not decide the amount of gain or other Section 453 or Section 1031 issues.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the taxpayer revoke an unintended election out of the installment method for gain from a deferred real-property exchange?
  • Outcome: Approved, with amended returns required for the affected years.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 453(a), (b), and (d); Temp. Treas. Reg. § 15a.453-1(d)(3) and (4)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                         Department of the Treasury
                                                                 Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201825024                                                Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/22/2018                                          Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 453.00-00, 453.08-00
                                                                 Person To Contact:
-------------------------------                                  ---------------------, ID No. -----------
---------------------------------                                Telephone Number:
-----------------------------------                              ----------------------
                                                                 Refer Reply To:
                                                                 CC:ITA:B04
                                                                 PLR-133834-17
                                                                 Date:
                                                                 March 26, 2018

LEGEND

Taxpayer                   =          -----------------------------------------------------
Taxpayer2                  =          ------------------------------------------------
B                          =          -------------------------------------------------------
Items                      =          -------------------------------------------------
LLC                        =          ----------------------------------
Date 1                     =          --------------------
Date 2                     =          ---------------------------
Date 3                     =          --------------------
Date 4                     =          --------------------
Date 5                     =          ------------------------
Place 1                    =          --------------------------------------------------------------
Place 2                    =          ---------------------------------------------------------------
Year 1                     =          -------
Year 2                     =          -------
Year 3                     =          -------
Year 4                     =          -------
Year 5                     =          -------
$U                         =          -------------------
$V                         =          ----------------
$W                         =          ----------------
$X                         =          ----------------
$Y                         =          ----------------
$Z                         =          --------------
Accountant                 =          --------------------
Representative             =          -----------------------


Dear -------------------:
PLR-133834-17                                        2

This is in reply to a letter submitted by your authorized representative requesting a
ruling on your behalf under § 453(d)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 15a.453-
1(d)(4) of the Temporary Income Tax Regulations under the Installment Sales Revision
Act. You are requesting permission to revoke an election out of the installment method
for the deferred exchange of certain real property through a qualified intermediary.

FACTS

Taxpayer on behalf of himself and as B of Taxpayer2, his wife, has requested this
ruling. Taxpayer is a majority shareholder and CFO of a corporation that sells Items,
and individually and as a partner, is the owner of numerous residential and commercial
rental properties.

On Date 1, Taxpayer entered into an exchange agreement with LLC, a qualified
intermediary (Intermediary), to effect a tax-deferred exchange of commercial real
property owned by Taxpayer located at Place 1 (Relinquished Property). Pursuant to
the exchange agreement, the Relinquished Property was sold by the Intermediary on
Date 2, late in Year 1 for $W. The Intermediary continued to hold the exchange funds
during the 180-day replacement period.

On Date 3, early in Year 2, Taxpayer and Intermediary executed a Replacement
Property Assignment and related documents assigning an agreement to purchase
property located at Place 2 (Replacement Property) and authorizing Intermediary to
disburse exchange funds to purchase the Replacement Property for $X.

On Date 4, in Year 2, Intermediary distributed to Taxpayer approximately $Y in excess
exchange funds, which was net of improvements1, transfer taxes, exchange expenses
and other fees. On Date 5, in Year 2, Taxpayer signed and timely filed the Year 1
federal individual income tax return that included Form 8824, Like-Kind Exchanges,
reporting recognized gain of $U that represents the amount of boot received on the
exchange. Taxpayer by recognizing gain in Year 1 that resulted in federal income tax of
$Z in effect elected out of the § 453 installment method.

In Year 5, as a result of a state income tax examination, Taxpayer, Accountant, and
Representative became aware that the gain recognized in Year 1 could have been
deferred until Year 2 under the installment method. By his own admission, Accountant
incorrectly advised Taxpayer that the Year 1 Form 1099-S reporting the first leg of the
exchange required the gain to be reported in Year 1. This is contrary to a correct

1
  During the 180-day replacement period, in addition to the acquisition of the Replacement Property,
Intermediary utilized exchange funds to pay for improvements to the Replacement Property. We
understand that the improvements to the Replacement Property may not have been properly identified
within the 45-day identification period and without such support there could be additional gain that may be
recognized on the exchange of approximately $V.
PLR-133834-17                                3

understanding that the § 453 installment method may apply and that gain may be
deferred until after the second leg of the exchange in Year 2.

Shortly after becoming aware of the error, Representative promptly filed this private
letter ruling request on behalf of Taxpayer and Taxpayer concurrently and timely filed an
amended return for Year 1. The amended return was filed as a protective claim for
refund pending the determination of this ruling request.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 453(a) of the Code provides that a taxpayer shall report income from an
installment sale under the installment method. Section 453(b)(1) defines an installment
sale as a disposition of property for which at least one payment is to be received after
the close of the taxable year of the disposition.

Section 453(d)(1) provides, however, that the installment method will not apply to a
disposition if the taxpayer elects to not have the installment method apply to such
disposition. Under § 453(d)(2), except as otherwise provided by regulations, an election
out of the installment method with respect to a disposition may be made only on or
before the due date prescribed by law (including extensions) for filing the taxpayer's
return of tax for the taxable year in which the disposition occurs.

Section 15a.453-1(d)(3)(i) of the regulations provides that an election out of the
installment method must be made in the manner prescribed by the appropriate forms for
the taxpayer's return for the taxable year of the sale. A taxpayer who reports an amount
realized equal to the selling price including the full face amount of any installment
obligation on the tax return filed for the taxable year in which an installment sale occurs
will be considered to have made an effective election.

Section 453(d)(3) provides that a taxpayer who has elected out of the installment
method may revoke that election only with the consent of the Secretary.

Section 15a.453-1(d)(4) provides that generally an election out is irrevocable. An
election out may be revoked only with the consent of the Internal Revenue Service. A
revocation, which is retroactive, will not be permitted when one of its purposes is the
avoidance of federal income taxes, or when the taxable year in which any payment was
received has closed.

In this case, Accountant did not correctly advise Taxpayer regarding the installment
method for Taxpayer’s Year 1 federal income tax return. Accountant erroneously
prepared the Year 1 return reporting all the gain from the exchange. Had Taxpayer
been properly informed, gain would have been deferred until Year 2 under the
installment method. As soon as Taxpayer became aware of this oversight,
Representative filed a request for consent to revoke the election out of the installment
PLR-133834-17                                 4

method. The request to revoke the election does not involve hindsight or a purpose of
avoiding federal income taxes.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, based on the information submitted and the representations made,
Taxpayer is granted permission to revoke the election out of the installment method for
Year 1. Taxpayer must file an amended federal income tax return for Year 2 to report
the taxable gain recognized on the exchange. Taxpayer must also file amended tax
returns for Year 3 and Year 4 to reduce any tax carry-forwards affected by the amended
tax returns filed in Year 1 and Year 2.

CAVEATS

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter. Thus, we do not express any opinions under §§ 453 or 1031, except that
Taxpayer may revoke the election out of the installment method for Year 1 and report
taxable gain under the installment method under § 453 to the extent allowed by that
section. We do not express any opinion on the amount of gain reportable under § 453.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.
PLR-133834-17                                  5


In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to Representative.

                                       Sincerely,



                                       Michael J. Montemurro
                                       Branch Chief, Branch 4
                                       Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                       (Income Tax & Accounting)




cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.