Consolidated group could file a late waiver of its loss carryback

Number
201817017
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Consolidated Net Operating Loss Deduction; Other
Code sections
§ 172, § 6662, § 6110
Ruling dated
January 30, 2018
Publicly released
April 27, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate parent intended to waive the entire carryback period for its consolidated group's net operating loss. The group's returns consistently treated the waiver as effective, but the required election statement was not validly filed. The parent relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make or recommend the election, and it requested relief before the IRS discovered the omission. The IRS found reasonable reliance, good faith, and no prejudice to the government, and granted 60 days to amend the loss-year return and attach the election. Relief was conditioned on the group's aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been with a timely election, after accounting for the time value of money.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the consolidated group make a late election to waive the entire carryback period for its consolidated net operating loss?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file and a tax-liability condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 172(b)(3); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i), 301.9100-1, and 301.9100-3.

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201817017
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/27/2018
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Numbers: 9100.22-00, 1502.21-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------
---------------------, ID No. ----------------
---------------------
Telephone Number:
-------------------------------------
----------------------
------------------------------------------------------- Refer Reply To:
---------------------------
CC:CORP:B05
PLR-132259-17
Date:
January 30, 2018

LEGEND

Parent = -------------------------------------
------------------------

Date 1 = --------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Company Official & Tax = -------------
Professional
-----------------------------
-------------------------------------

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to a letter dated October 11, 2017, submitted on behalf of Parent, requesting an extension of time under §§ 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make an election. The extension is being requested for Parent to make an election under § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) to relinquish the entire carryback period for the Parent consolidated group’s consolidated net operating loss (“CNOL”) for the tax year ending Date 1 (the “Election”). Additional information was submitted in letters dated November 20, 2017, November 30, 2017, and January 2, 2018. The material information submitted for consideration is summarized below.

Parent was the common parent of a consolidated group (“Parent Group”). The Parent Group sustained a CNOL in the tax year ending on Date 1. Parent intended to relinquish the carryback period for its consolidated group’s CNOL on its tax return for the tax year ending Date 1. All returns for the Parent Group were filed consistent with a valid election having been made. However, for various reasons, a valid election was not
PLR-132259-17
2

filed. After Date 2, the date that the Election was due, it was discovered that a valid election was not filed. Subsequently, this request was submitted for an extension of time to file a valid election.

Parent has represented that the Parent Group has not and will not carry back any portion of the CNOL for the tax year ending Date 1 to a prior consolidated return year of the Parent Group. Parent has also represented that no member of the consolidated group of which Parent was the common parent for the tax year ending Date 1 had a separate return year, within the meaning of § 1.1502-1(e), at any time during the carryback period.

Parent has further represented that Parent is not seeking to alter a return position for which an accuracy-related penalty has been or could be imposed under § 6662 at the time Parent requested relief and the new return position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested.

Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) provides that a consolidated group may make an irrevocable election under § 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period with respect to a CNOL for any consolidated return year. The election is made in a separate statement entitled “THIS IS AN ELECTION UNDER § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) TO WAIVE THE ENTIRE CARRYBACK PERIOD PURSUANT TO SECTION 172(b)(3) FOR THE [insert consolidated return year] CNOLs OF THE CONSOLIDATED GROUP OF WHICH [insert name and employer identification number of common parent] IS THE COMMON PARENT.” Section 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i) also provides that the statement must be filed with the group’s income tax return for the consolidated return year in which the loss arises.

Under § 301.9100-1(c), the Commissioner has discretion to grant a reasonable extension of time to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal Revenue Code except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make a regulatory election. Section 301.9100-1(a). Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2. Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Section 301.9100-3(a).
PLR-132259-17
3

In this case, the time for filing the Election is fixed by the regulations (i.e., § 1.1502- 21(b)(3)(i)). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under § 301.9100- 3 to grant an extension of time for Parent to file the Election, provided Parent establishes it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Information, affidavits, and representations submitted by Parent and Company Official & Tax Professional explain the circumstances that resulted in the failure to timely file a valid election. The information establishes that Parent reasonably relied on a qualified tax professional who failed to make, or advise Parent to make, the Election, and that the request for relief was filed before the failure to timely make the Election was discovered by the Internal Revenue Service. See § 301.9100-3(b)(1)(i) and (v).

Based on the facts and information submitted, including the representations made, we conclude that Parent has shown it acted reasonably and in good faith, the requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 are satisfied, and granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government. Accordingly, an extension of time is granted under
§ 301.9100-1, until 60 days from the date on this letter, for Parent to file the Election with respect to the relinquishment of the entire carryback period for the CNOL for the tax year ending Date 1, as described above.

The above extension of time is conditioned on the taxpayers’ (Parent and the members of its consolidated group) tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the Election applies, than it would have been if the Election had been timely made (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to the taxpayers’ tax liability for the years involved. A determination thereof will be made by the Director’s office upon audit of the Federal income tax returns involved.

Parent must file the Election in accordance with § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). The Parent Group’s return for the tax year ending Date 1, having been filed consistent with a valid election having been made, must be amended to attach the election statement required by § 1.1502-21(b)(3)(i). A copy of this letter must be attached to the election statement. Alternatively, if the Parent Group files its returns electronically, Parent may satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to its return that provides the date on and control number of this letter ruling.

We express no opinion as to the tax effects or consequences of filing the Election late under the provisions of any other section of the Code and regulations, or as to the tax treatment of any conditions existing at the time of, or resulting from, filing the Election late that are not specifically set forth in the above ruling.
PLR-132259-17
4

For purposes of granting relief under § 301.9100-3, we relied on certain statements and representations made by Parent and Company Official & Tax Professional. However, the Director should verify all essential facts. Moreover, notwithstanding that an extension is granted under § 301.9100-3 to file the Election, penalties and interest that would otherwise be applicable, if any, continue to apply.

This letter is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Pursuant to the power of attorney on file in the office, a copy of this letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Ken Cohen ___
Ken Cohen
Chief, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Corporate)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace