Private Letter Ruling 201812008 Released March 23, 2018 Approved

Permits a related corporation to use tax book value for interest allocation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A domestic corporation asked to change from fair market value to tax book value when valuing assets to allocate and apportion interest expense. It was related to, but not included in, another corporation's consolidated group, and both had previously used fair market value. The related consolidated parent was simultaneously requesting the same change. Because the regulations generally require a taxpayer and related persons to keep using fair market value unless the Commissioner authorizes a change, the corporation needed IRS approval. The IRS permitted tax book value for the specified year and future years for all operative Code sections, including sections 199 and 904.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the corporation change from fair market value to tax book value for allocating and apportioning interest expense?
  • Outcome: Approved.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 864(e); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8(f)(2), 1.861-8T(c)(2), and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii).

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201812008
Release Date: 3/23/2018
[Third Party Communication:
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 861.09-00, 861.09-06,
861.09-07

Person To Contact:
[redacted], ID No. [redacted]
Telephone Number:
[redacted]
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B03
PLR-135404-17
Date:
December 20, 2017

TY: [redacted]

Legend

CORP A = [redacted]
CORP B = [redacted]

Dear [redacted]:

This is in response to your representative’s letter dated October 3, 2017, requesting a
ruling on behalf of CORP B that it be permitted to value its assets on the basis of the tax
book value method of asset valuation for purposes of its [redacted] taxable year.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by CORP B and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

CORP A, a domestic corporation, is a calendar year taxpayer that uses the accrual
method as its overall method of accounting. CORP A is the common parent of a group
of affiliated corporations that files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. CORP
A consolidated group utilized the fair market value method of asset valuation for taxable
years prior to taxable year [redacted].

CORP B is a domestic corporation that is not part of the CORP A consolidated group.
CORP A and CORP B are related persons within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.861-

PLR-135404-17 2

8T(c)(2). Accordingly, CORP B also utilized the fair market value method of asset
valuation for taxable years prior to taxable year [redacted]. CORP A is simultaneously
requesting to value its assets on the basis of the tax book value method.

Section 864(e) provides that all allocations and apportionments of interest expense shall
be made on the basis of assets rather than gross income. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8
through 1.861-12 and Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8T through 1.861-13T set forth the rules
specific to the allocation and apportionment of interest expense. Treas. Reg. 1.861-
9T(g)(1)(ii) provides that a taxpayer may elect to determine the value of its assets on
the basis of either tax book value or the fair market value of its assets. Treas. Reg. §
1.861-8T(c)(2) provides that, once a taxpayer uses the fair market value method, the
taxpayer and all related persons must continue to use such method unless expressly
authorized by the Commissioner to change methods.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, pursuant to
Treas. Reg. § 1.861-8(f)(2) and Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8T(c)(2) and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii),
CORP B may value its assets on the basis of the tax book value method of asset
valuation for purposes of apportioning interest expense for all operative sections,
including sections 199 and 904 of the Code, for the [redacted] taxable year and future years.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.

Sincerely,

Michael I. Gilman
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 3
Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2018, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.