Entire administrative record is generally advisable with summary judgment motion

Number
201808014
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Expenses of Detection and Punishment of Frauds
Code sections
§ 7623
Ruling dated
December 1, 2017
Publicly released
February 23, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel advised that it is generally appropriate to submit the entire administrative record to the Tax Court with a motion for summary judgment, given the court's desire for information in the relevant cases. The advice was not categorical: the assigned attorney should decide case by case, considering the facts, the judge, and other circumstances. Existing procedures for Collection Due Process cases were identified as useful guidance, particularly the Chief Counsel Directives Manual provisions on stipulating facts, submitting the administrative record, and declarations.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Should a motion for summary judgment include the entire administrative record?
  • Outcome: Generally yes, but the assigned attorney retains case-specific discretion.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 7623; CCDM 35.4.7.9 and 35.3.23.8.4

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2017120115245148
UILC: 7623.00-00

Number: 201808014
Release Date: 2/23/2018
From:
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 3:24:51 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: MSJ Administrative Record Question

----------------------

The question, “should the entire administrative record be submitted to the Court on an MSJ” was raised at the training this week. We had some thoughts that we wanted to share. Given the Court’s desire for information in these cases, we generally think that it would be advisable to include the entire administrative record with the MSJ. That said, we recognize that this may not always be the best practice, and we think that the ultimate decision is best left to your discretion. The assigned attorney should evaluate each case based on the facts of the case, the assigned judge, or any other number of factors when determining whether to submit the entire administrative record to the Tax Court. The current procedures in CDP cases are also instructive and provide useful guidance, so we wanted to bring them to your attention so you could share with your attorneys. Of particular note we suggest looking to CCDM 35.4.7.9, Stipulation of Facts and Submission of Administrative Record in Collection Due Process (CDP) Cases, and CCDM 35.3.23.8.4, Declaration, among the other CDP CCDM sections.

Thank you,
------------------------------------
---------------------------------------
--------------
---------------
-----------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace