Remaining family property keeps its pre-1990 transfer status

Number
201808003
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Definition; Imposition of Gift Tax (Imposed v. Not Imposed); Special Valuation Rules for Transfers in Trust
Code sections
§ 2701, § 2702, § 2703, § 2704, § 6110
Ruling dated
November 16, 2017
Publicly released
February 23, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A married couple and their six children bought real property before October 9, 1990, paying separately for life estates and remainder interests. The life tenants proposed conveying all their interests in one geographically defined part of the property to the children while leaving the same interests in the remaining acreage unchanged. The IRS concluded that the untouched acreage would continue to be treated as arising from a pre-October 9, 1990 transfer for the special valuation rules in chapter 14. If that acreage is later sold, its proceeds and reinvestments held in the proceeds trust will retain the same treatment. The ruling rests on the parties having substantially identical interests in the remaining acreage before and after the partial conveyance.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Will a partial conveyance cause the remaining acreage or its later sale proceeds to lose pre-October 9, 1990 status under chapter 14?
  • Outcome: Approved, the remaining acreage and qualifying later proceeds retain pre-October 9, 1990 transfer treatment.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2701-2704, particularly § 2702

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201808003
Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 2/23/2018
Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2702.00-00, 2501.00-00,
2031.00-00
Person To Contact:



-----------------
------------------------------
Telephone Number:
--------------------------------
----------------------
Refer Reply To:


CC:PSI:B04
PLR-116713-17
Date:
November 16, 2017

Legend

Husband
----------------------------------------------
Proceeds Trust
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Wife
-----------------------------------------------------
Child 1
-----------------------------------------------------
Child 2
----------------------------------------------------
Child 3
----------------------------------------------
Child 4
-------------------------------------------------------
Child 5
------------------------------------------------
Child 6
-------------------------------------------------
State 1
-------------
State 2
---------
Real Property
-----------------------------
Agreement
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter dated April 17, 2017, requesting gift tax rulings.

The facts and representations submitted are as follows:

Prior to October 8, 1990, Husband, Wife, and their six children (Child 1, Child 2, Child 3, Child 4, Child 5, and Child 6) purchased Real Property, located in State 1, from an unrelated party for fair market value. Husband, Wife, and Children 1 through 6 executed an Agreement in connection with Real Property acquisition. In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, Husband, Wife, and Children 1 through 6 each paid
PLR-116713-17
2

the actuarial value of their respective interest from their own resources and none of the six children used any funds acquired from their parents to acquire their respective interests. Pursuant to the Agreement, Wife acquired a life interest in the use of and income from Real Property, Husband acquired a life interest in the use of and income from Real Property that will become effective upon the death of Wife, and the children each acquired a one-sixth common undivided interest in the remainder. The parties represent that they do not possess any property as life tenants and remaindermen acquired after October 8, 1990. Husband and Wife are referred to individually as “Life Tenant” and together as “Life Tenants,” and Children 1 through 6 are referred to as “Remaindermen.”

In accordance with the terms of the Agreement, Proceeds Trust was created to receive the proceeds from the sale of certain real property subject to the Agreement. The proceeds from any future sale of Real Property is to be deposited in Proceeds Trust, but only to the extent the proceeds are attributable to that portion of Real Property subject to the Agreement (and held as a life estate and a remainder interest) at the time of the sale. Proceeds Trust provides that the trustees shall invest and reinvest the proceeds and pay to the current Life Tenant, at least annually, all income (but not principal or corpus), and upon the death of both Life Tenants, the trustees shall terminate Proceeds Trust and distribute the remaining trust assets to the Remaindermen in accordance with their respective interests. Proceeds Trust is governed under the law of State 2 and is sited in State 2. Proceeds Trust is irrevocable.

The Life Tenants now propose to execute and deliver to the Remaindermen a deed that conveys a geographically defined portion of the acreage of their life interests in Real Property. Under the law of State 1, the Remaindermen will become the outright owners of that geographically defined portion of Real Property upon receipt of the deed. The Life Tenants will be conveying their entire respective life interests in the geographically defined portion, and their interests in that geographically defined portion will be completely terminated. The remaining acreage of Real Property, not conveyed in the proposed transaction, will continue to be held as a life estate in the hands of the Life Tenants and a remainder interest by the Remaindermen.

You have requested the following ruling:

The remaining acreage of Real Property, not conveyed in the proposed transaction, will continue to be treated as resulting from a transfer occurring prior to October 8, 1990 for purposes of applying chapter 14. The proceeds of any later sale of this remaining acreage, along with the proceeds or reinvestments thereof, that will be held in Proceeds Trust will continue to be treated as resulting from a transfer occurring prior to October 8, 1990, for purposes of applying chapter 14.
PLR-116713-17
3

LAW AND ANALYSIS

The provisions of chapter 14 of the Code (§§ 2701-2704), were added by the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1990 and are effective for transfers occurring after October 8, 1990.

Section 2702(a)(1) provides, generally, that solely for purposes of determining whether a transfer of an interest in trust to (or for the benefit of) a member of the transferor's family is a gift (and the value of such transfer), the value of any interest in such trust retained by the transferor or any applicable family member shall be determined as provided in § 2702(a)(2).

Section 2702(a)(2) provides that the value of any retained interest which is not a qualified interest shall be treated as being zero.

Section 2702(b) defines a qualified interest as (1) any interest which consists of the right to receive fixed amounts payable not less frequently than annually, (2) any interest which consists of the right to receive amounts which are payable not less frequently than annually and are a fixed percentage of the fair market value of the property in the trust (determined annually), and (3) any noncontingent remainder interest if all of the other interests in the trust consist of interests described in (1) or (2) above.

Section 2702(c)(1) provides that the transfer of an interest in property with respect to which there is one or more term interests shall be treated as a transfer of an interest in a trust. Section 2702(c)(3) defines a term interest as including a life interest in property.

Section 2702(d) provides that in the case of a transfer of an income or remainder interest with respect to a specified portion of the property in a trust, only that portion shall be taken into account in applying § 2702 to the transfer.

In the instant case, with respect to the remaining acreage of Real Property that is not being conveyed, the Life Tenants and the Remaindermen will have substantially identical interests both before and after the proposed conveyances. The proposed conveyances will not involve that portion of the acreage of Real Property the life estate of which will continue to be held by the Life Tenants. Accordingly, based on the facts submitted and representations made, we conclude that the remaining acreage of Real Property, not conveyed in the proposed transaction, will continue to be treated as resulting from a transfer occurring prior to October 8, 1990 for purposes of applying chapter 14. Furthermore, the proceeds of any later sale of this remaining acreage, along with the proceeds or reinvestments thereof, that will be held in Proceeds Trust will continue to be treated as resulting from a transfer occurring prior to October 8, 1990, for purposes of applying chapter 14.
PLR-116713-17
4

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, we have sent a copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

Except as expressly provided herein, we neither express nor imply any opinion concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this letter.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations submitted by the Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

This ruling is directed only to the Taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

Sincerely,

Karlene M. Lesho
______
Karlene M. Lesho
Senior Technician Reviewer, Branch 4
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs and Special Industries)

Enclosure:
Copy for § 6110 purposes

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace