Reinsurer receives 60 days to make late domestic-corporation election

Number
201807007
Outcome
Approved
Document type
Private Letter Ruling
IRS subject
Election by Foreign Insurance Company to be Treated as Domestic Corporation
Topics
Code sections
§ 953, § 6072, § 6110, § 6662
Ruling dated
November 20, 2017
Publicly released
February 16, 2018

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling, issued in 2018, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2018
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A foreign associated reinsurance company intended to elect domestic-corporation treatment under section 953(d). Its operations manager and tax professional filed returns consistently with that treatment but failed to submit the required election statement, and the company did not discover the omission until later. The company requested relief before the IRS discovered the failure and represented that it was not using hindsight or seeking a lower tax liability. The IRS found that it met the reasonable-cause and government-prejudice standards. It granted 60 days to make the election, conditioned on aggregate tax liability not being lower than it would have been with a timely election.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the foreign reinsurer late-file its section 953(d) election to be treated as a domestic corporation?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to make the election and a no-lower-aggregate-tax condition.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 953(d) and 6072(b); Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3; Rev. Proc. 2003-47

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201807007
[Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 2/16/2018
Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 953.06-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------
------------------, ID No. ----------------
---------------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------------------
----------------------
----------------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:INTL:B02
PLR-123448-17
Date:
November 20, 2017

TY: -------

Legend

Taxpayer = ------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Country = -----------------------------------
Company = --------------------
Businesses = --------------------------------
CPA = ---------------
Date = -----------------
Year = -------

Dear ------------------:

This is in response to Taxpayer’s letter, submitted by your authorized representative and received by our office on July 31, 2017, requesting an extension of time under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3 to make the election provided by section 953(d) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) to be treated as a domestic corporation for U.S. tax purposes effective for Year.

The ruling contained in this letter is predicated upon facts and representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an appropriate party. This office has not verified any of the material submitted in
PLR-123448-17
2

support of the request for a ruling. Verification of the factual information, representations, and other data may be required as part of the audit process.

Taxpayer is an associated reinsurance company organized under the laws of Country. Taxpayer reinsures certain finance and insurance products sold by (a) Company, a third party unrelated program administrator and (b) related Businesses. Taxpayer engaged the services of Company to manage its operations, maintain compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, and prepare Taxpayer’s federal income tax returns. Company employed CPA to conduct tax compliance management for its clients, including Taxpayer. CPA has many years of experience with captive insurance company formations and operations. Both Company and CPA were tasked with the responsibility of filing Taxpayer’s federal income tax returns, including making valid elections when appropriate.

Taxpayer intended to make the section 953(d) election by filing an election statement with the IRS when filing its corporate income tax return for Year. Further, Company filed an income tax return on Taxpayer’s behalf consistent with that position for Year and subsequent years. However, Taxpayer was unaware that such election was not made. Taxpayer became aware of the missing election in Date and took corrective action.

Taxpayer’s failure to make the section 953(d) election was not discovered by the Internal Revenue Service before Taxpayer submitted its ruling request. In addition, Taxpayer represents that it does not seek to alter a return position for which the accuracy-related penalty has been or could have been imposed under section 6662 at the time Taxpayer requested relief, and the new position requires or permits a regulatory election for which relief is requested. Finally, Taxpayer represents that it has not used hindsight to seek an extension of time to make the election. Taxpayer represents that granting relief will not result in a lower tax liability than it would have had if it had filed the section 953(d) election timely.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a taxpayer a reasonable extension of time, under the rules set forth in Treas. Reg.
§ 301.9100-3, to make a regulatory election under all subtitles of the Code, except subtitles E, G, H, and I.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(b) provides that an election includes an application for relief in respect of tax, and defines a regulatory election as an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation, a revenue ruling, revenue procedure, notice, or announcement.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief subject to this section will be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence (including affidavits described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(e)) to establish to the satisfaction of the
PLR-123448-17
3

Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government.

Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(b)(1) provides that except as provided in paragraphs (b)(3)(i) through (iii) of that section, a taxpayer is deemed to have acted reasonably and in good faith if it meets one of the conditions described in Treas. Reg. § 301.9100- 3(b)(1)(i) through (v).

Treas. Reg. §301.9100-3(c)(1) provides that relief will be granted only when the interests of the Government will not be prejudiced.

Rev. Proc. 2003-47, 2003-2 C.B. 55, 56, provides that the election to be treated as a domestic corporation under section 953(d), to be effective for a taxable year, must be filed by the due date prescribed in section 6072(b) (with extensions) for the United States income tax return that is due if the election becomes effective.

In the present situation, Rev. Proc. 2003-47 fixes the time to make the election under section 953(d). Therefore, the Commissioner has discretionary authority under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(c) to grant Taxpayer an extension of time, provided that Taxpayer satisfies the standards set forth under Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a).

Based on the facts and information submitted, we conclude that Taxpayer satisfies Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3(a). Accordingly, Taxpayer is granted an extension of time of 60 days from the date of this ruling letter to make the election provided by section 953(d), in accordance with the procedural rules set forth in Rev. Proc. 2003-47, to be treated as a domestic corporation for federal income tax purposes effective for Year.

The above extension of time is conditioned on Taxpayer’s tax liability (if any) being not lower, in the aggregate, for all years to which the section 953(d) election applies than it would have been if the election had been timely filed (taking into account the time value of money). No opinion is expressed as to Taxpayer’s tax liability for the taxable years involved. Further, the granting of the above extension is not a determination that Taxpayer is otherwise eligible to make the section 953(d) election. Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-1(a).

Taxpayer should attach a copy of this letter ruling to its federal income tax return for the relevant year.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-123448-17
4

Pursuant to a power of attorney on file in this office, a copy of this ruling letter is being furnished to your authorized representative.

Sincerely,

Kristine A. Crabtree
Senior Technical Reviewer, Branch 2
(International)

cc:

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This determination bound one taxpayer and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace