Private Letter Ruling 201744005 Released November 3, 2017 Approved

Affiliated group received more time to elect out of bonus depreciation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A corporate parent asked for extra time to elect out of additional first-year depreciation for three classes of qualified property placed in service by its affiliated group. The group had claimed bonus depreciation after a tax employee mistakenly believed that certain foreign tax credit carryovers would remain available for another year. A later reconciliation showed that the credits would expire unless used in the return year at issue. The IRS found that the regulatory requirements for relief were satisfied and gave the group 60 days to make the election through an amended consolidated return. The ruling did not decide whether any particular property qualified for bonus depreciation.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the affiliated group receive an extension to elect out of bonus depreciation for three property classes?
  • Outcome: Approved, with 60 days to file the election on an amended consolidated return.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-1(e), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201744005                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 11/3/2017                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
------------------------------------------------------------   --------------------------------, ID No. ----------
------------------------------------------                     ------------------
---------------                                                Telephone Number:
------------------------------                                 ----------------------
----------------------------------                             Refer Reply To:
                                                               CC:ITA:B07
                                                               PLR-104729-17
                                                               Date:
                                                               August 03, 2017


Re: Request for Extension of Time to Make the Election Not to Deduct the Additional
First Year Depreciation

Legend

Parent = ----------------------------------------

S1 = -------------------------------------------------

S2 = -----------------------------------------------------

S3 = -------------------------------------------------------

S4 = ------------------------------------------------

S5 = --------------------------------------------

S6 = -----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date 1 = ------------------------

Date 2 = ----------------------

Date 3 = ------------------------

A = -------

B = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLR-104729-17                                            2

C = --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D = --

E = --

F = ----

G = ----------------

H = ----------------

I = --------------

J = --------------

K = ----------------------

L = -------

M = --------------------

N = -------

O = -------

P = -------------------------


Dear -------------:

       This letter responds to a letter dated February 1, 2017, and subsequent
correspondence, submitted by Parent on behalf of itself and S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6
(hereinafter collectively referred to as “Taxpayer”), requesting an extension of time
pursuant to § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the
election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code for its D-year, E-year, and F-year classes of qualified property placed in
service by Taxpayer during the taxable year ended Date 1 (the A taxable year).

        All references in this letter ruling to § 168(k) are treated as a reference to §
168(k) as in effect: (i) prior to amendment by § 143(b) of the Protecting Americans from
Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act), enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations
Act, 2016, Division Q, Pub. L. 114-113, 129 Stat. 2242 (December 18, 2015), for
qualified property acquired by Taxpayer after 2007 and placed in service by Taxpayer
PLR-104729-17                                3

before 2016, and (ii) after amendment by § 143(b) of the PATH Act for qualified property
placed in service by Taxpayer after 2015. The amendments made to § 168(k) by §
143(b) of the PATH Act generally are effective for property placed in service after
December 31. 2015. See § 143(b)(7)(A) of the PATH Act.

FACTS

      Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

       Parent is a corporation and the common parent of an affiliated group of
corporations that includes S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, and S6. The affiliated group of
corporations files a consolidated federal income tax return on a fiscal year basis.
Parent is an apparel company B. Taxpayer uses the accrual method of accounting for
federal income tax purposes and in maintaining its books and records and uses a C for
tax and financial reporting purposes. Taxpayer timely filed its consolidated federal
income tax return for the A taxable year. The period of limitation on assessment under
§ 6501(a) for the A taxable year has not expired as of the date of this letter.

       During its A taxable year, Taxpayer placed in service D-year, E-year, and F-year
property that is qualified property as defined in § 168(k)(2) with a total cost of $G. Of
this amount, $H is D-year property that was placed in service by Parent, S1, S2, S3, S4,
and S6; $I is E-year property that was placed in service by Parent, S2, S5, and S6; and
$J is F-year property that was placed in service by S6. On Parent’s consolidated
federal income tax return for the A taxable year, Taxpayer claimed the additional first
year depreciation with respect to such property.

        Parent’s tax department prepared the consolidated federal income tax return for
the A taxable year. M of Parent’s tax department has overall responsibility for such
return. Parent’s tax department considered making the election not to deduct the
additional first year depreciation for qualified property placed in service during the A
taxable year. In making the decision not to make this election for the D-year, E-year,
and F-year property placed in service by Taxpayer during the A taxable year, various
tax attributes of Parent’s consolidated group, including foreign tax credit carryovers,
were taken into account. Certain of the foreign tax credit carryovers to the A taxable
year were attributable to K, which Parent acquired in L, for K’s taxable year ended Date
2.

       As part of this decision-making process, M reviewed the foreign tax credit
schedule. It showed K’s foreign tax credits as arising in N, with no indication that these
foreign tax credits actually arose in K’s taxable year ended Date 2. As a result, M
believed that this foreign tax credit carryover could be utilized through the year ending
Date 3 (the O taxable year), which is the taxable year ending after the A taxable year.
However, because these foreign tax credits arose in K’s taxable year ended Date 2, the
carryover of such credits could only be utilized through the A taxable year. Based on
PLR-104729-17                                 4

M’s mistaken belief that the foreign tax credit carryover attributable to K for K’s taxable
year ended Date 2, could be utilized through the O taxable year instead of the A taxable
year, the decision was made not to make the election not to deduct the additional first
year depreciation for the D-year, E-year, and F-year property that are qualified property
and placed in service by Taxpayer during the A taxable year.

       Subsequent to the filing of Parent’s consolidated federal income tax return for the
A taxable year, P of Parent’s tax department was reconciling tax attributes as part of
planning for the O taxable year. In performing this reconciliation, P realized that the
foreign tax credit carryover attributable to K for K’s taxable year ended Date 2, would
expire unutilized if not utilized in the A taxable year.

RULING REQUESTED

       Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and
301.9100-3 to make the election under § 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) or § 168(k)(7), as applicable,
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for its D-year, E-year,
and F-year property placed in service during the A taxable year that qualify for the
additional first year depreciation deduction.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

       Qualified property placed in service before 2016

       Section 168(k)(1) allowed, in the taxable year that qualified property is placed in
service, a 50-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for qualified property (i)
acquired by a taxpayer after December 31, 2007, and before September 9, 2010, or
after December 31, 2011 (or December 31, 2012, for qualified property described in §§
168(k)(2)(B) or 168(k)(2)(C)) and before January 1, 2016, and (ii) placed in service by
the taxpayer before September 9, 2010, or after December 31, 2011 (or December 31,
2012, for qualified property described in §§ 168(k)(2)(B) or 168(k)(2)(C)) and before
January 1, 2016 (or January 1, 2017, for qualified property described in §§ 168(k)(2)(B)
or 168(k)(2)(C)).

        Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provided that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct
additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service by the
taxpayer during the taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)–
1(e)(2)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations to mean, in general, each class of property
described in § 168(e) (for example, 5-year property). See section 5.01 of Rev. Proc.
2008-54, 2008-2 C.B. 722, and section 3.01 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B. 664
(rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1 for “qualified property” or for “30-percent
additional first year depreciation deduction” apply for purposes of § 168(k) as currently
in effect).
PLR-104729-17                                  5

       Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(i) provides that the election not to deduct additional first
year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal
tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by the taxpayer.

       Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) provides that the election not to deduct additional first
year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, “Depreciation
and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the A taxable
year provided that the election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation is
made by attaching a statement to the taxpayer's timely filed tax return (including
extensions) indicating that the taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation and the class of property for which the taxpayer is making the election.

       Qualified property placed in service in 2016

        Section 168(k)(1) allows, in the taxable year that qualified property is placed in
service, a 50-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for qualified property
placed in service by the taxpayer before January 1, 2020 (or January 1, 2021, for
qualified property described in §§ 168(k)(2)(B) or 168(k)(2)(C)).

       Section 168(k)(7) allows a taxpayer to elect not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation for any class of property placed in service by the taxpayer during the
taxable year.

       Section 4.04 of Rev. Proc. 2017-33, 2017-19 I.R.B. 1236, 1240, provides
guidance regarding the election under § 168(k)(7) not to deduct the additional first year
depreciation (the § 168(k)(7) election). Section 4.04(1) of Rev. Proc. 2017-33 provides
that the rules for making the § 168(k)(7) election are similar to the rules for making the
election under § 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) as in effect before the enactment of the PATH Act. As
a result, the § 168(k)(7) election applies to all qualified property that is in the same class
of property and placed in service in the same taxable year. Section 4.04(2) of Rev.
Proc. 2017-33 provides that generally rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2), (3),
(5) and (7) apply for purposes of § 168(k)(7). Section 4.04(3) of Rev. Proc. 2017-33
provides special rules for a taxpayer with a taxable year beginning in 2015 and ending
in 2016.

       Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3

       Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has discretion to
grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.

       Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the
Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
PLR-104729-17                                 6

elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

        Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be
granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSION

        Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the
requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for its D-year, E-year,
and F-year of property placed in service by Taxpayer during the A taxable year that
qualify for the additional first year depreciation deduction. This election must be made
by Parent filing an amended consolidated federal income tax return for the A taxable
year, with a statement indicating that Taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation for its D-year, E-year, and F-year property placed in service
during that taxable year.

       Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the
federal income tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of §168). Specifically, no opinion is
expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by
Taxpayer during the A taxable year is eligible for the additional first year depreciation
deduction.

      The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by Parent and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.
PLR-104729-17                                7

      This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

        In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter
ruling to Parent's authorized representative. We also are sending a copy of this letter
ruling to the appropriate operating division director.



                                                 Sincerely yours,

                                                 KATHLEEN REED

                                                 KATHLEEN REED
                                                 Chief, Branch 7
                                                 Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                                 (Income Tax & Accounting)


Enclosures (2):
      copy of this letter
      copy for section 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.