Private Letter Ruling 201726015 Released June 30, 2017 Approved Transcribed from scan

Parent may add an omitted subsidiary to its consolidated return

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A parent and one subsidiary filed a consolidated return, while another wholly owned subsidiary filed a separate return reporting no income or deductions. The return preparer mistakenly believed that including the omitted subsidiary was optional. The group did not qualify for automatic relief, and the omitted subsidiary's income was not on the consolidated return, its separate return had been filed, and it was absent from Form 851. The IRS nevertheless found a mistake of law under Treasury Regulation section 1.1502-75(b)(3). It allowed the parent to amend the consolidated return to include the subsidiary as though it had timely filed Form 1122 and joined in the original consolidated filing.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the parent amend its consolidated return to include a wholly owned subsidiary omitted because of the preparer's mistake of law?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 1501 and 1504; Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(3); Rev. Proc. 2014-24

Full text (IRS public release)

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20224

LARGE BUSINESS AND
INTERNATIONAL DIVISION April 5, 2017

Release Number: 201726015
Release Date: 6/30/2017
UIL Code: 1501.00-00

Legend

Taxpayer =

Parent =

Sub 1 =

Sub 2 =

Accounting Firm 1 =

Date 1 =

Date 2 =

Date 3 =

Date 4 =

Dear                 :

This letter responds to a letter dated Date 1, submitted on behalf of Taxpayer, requesting the
Commissioner make a determination regarding the failure of one of its wholly owned
subsidiaries, Sub 1, to join in the filing of a consolidated U.S. income tax return, as required by
Section 1.1502-75(a)(1) of the Regulations, for the tax year ended Date 2,

Representations

On Date 4, Parent purchased 100% of the outstanding stock of Sub 1.

On Date 3, Parent organized a wholly owned subsidiary, Sub 2, as a limited liability
company and timely filed Form 8832 in which Sub 2 elected to be taxed as a
corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, effective as of its formation.

• For the tax year ended Date 2, Parent and Sub 1 filed separate returns.

• For the tax year ended Date 2, Parent and one of its subsidiaries, Sub 2 elected to file a
consolidated return.

• For the tax year ended Date 2, Sub 1 filed a separate Form 1120, on which it reported
no income and no deductions.

• The Date 2 consolidated return for Taxpayer included Form 1122 Authorization and
Consent of Subsidiary Corporation To Be Included in a Consolidated Income Tax
Return for Sub 2.

• The Date 2 consolidated return for Taxpayer included Form 851 Affiliations Schedule,
on which Sub 2 was the only reported affiliated group member.

Law

IRC § 1501 provides that “An affiliated group of corporations shall...have the privilege of
making a consolidated return with respect to the income tax imposed by chapter 1 for the taxable
year in lieu of separate returns. The making of a consolidated return shall be upon the condition
that all corporations which at any time during the taxable year have been members of the
affiliated group consent to all the consolidated return regulations prescribed under section 1502
prior to the last day prescribed by law for the filing of such return. The making of a consolidated
return shall be considered as such consent.”

IRC § 1504(a)(1) and (2) define the term “affiliated group” as “1 or more chains of includible
corporations connected through stock ownership with a common parent corporation which is an
includible corporation, but only if—

(i) The common parent directly owns stock with at least 80% of the total voting power
and 80% of the total value of at least 1 other includible corporations, and

(ii) Stock with at least 80% of the total voting power and 80% of the total value of each
of the includible corporations is directly owned by 1 or more of the other includible

corporations.”


Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(a)(1) provides that “A group which did not file a consolidated return for
the immediately preceding taxable year may file a consolidated return in lieu of separate returns
for the taxable year, provided that each corporation that has been a member during any part of
the taxable year for which the consolidated return is to be filed consents (in the manner provided
in paragraph (b) of this section) to the regulations under section 1502.”

Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(1) provides that “The consent of a corporation shall be made by the
corporation joining in the making of the consolidated return for such year. A corporation shall
be deemed to have joined in the making of a consolidated return if it files a Form 1122 in the
manner specified in paragraph (h)(2) of this section.”

Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(2) provides that “If a member of the group fails to file Form 1122,
the Commissioner may under the facts and circumstances determine that such member has joined
in the making of a consolidated return by such group. The following circumstances, among
others, will be taken into account in making this determination: (i) Whether or not the income
and deductions of the member were included in the consolidated return; (ii) Whether or not a
separate return was filed by the member for that taxable year; and (iii) Whether or not the
member was included in the affiliations schedule, Form 851. If the Commissioner determines
that the member has joined in the making of the consolidated return, such member shall be
treated as if it had filed a Form 1122 for such year for purposes of paragraph (h)(2) of this
section.”

Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(3) provides that “If any member has failed to join in the making of
a consolidated return under either subparagraph (1) or (2) of this paragraph, then the tax liability
of each member of the group shall be determined on the basis of separate returns unless the
common parent corporation establishes to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the failure of
such member to join in the making of the consolidated return was due to a mistake of law or fact,
or to inadvertence. In such case, such member shall be treated as if it had filed a Form 1122 for
such year for purposes of paragraph (h)(2) of this section, and thus joined in the making of the
consolidated return for such year.”

Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(h)(2) provides that “If a group wishes to file a consolidated return for a
taxable year, then a Form 1122 (“Authorization and Consent of Subsidiary Corporation To Be
Included in a Consolidated Income Tax Return”) must be executed by each subsidiary... For
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2002, the group must attach either executed Forms
1122 or unsigned copies of the completed Forms 1122 to the consolidated return. ... Form 1122
is not required for a taxable year if a consolidated return was filed (or was required to be filed)
by the group for the immediately preceding taxable year.”

Rev. Proc. 2014-24 allows an affiliated group that satisfies certain requirements to obtain an
automatic determination to treat a subsidiary member of the affiliated group as if it filed a Form
1122, even though it failed to do so.

In this case, the Parent affiliated group does not satisfy the requirements of Revenue Procedure
2014-24 necessary to obtain automatic relief to treat Sub 1 as if it filed Form 1122 for the tax
year ended Date 2. However, the IRS may act on behalf of the Commissioner to treat Sub 1 as if
it had filed a Form 1122 and joined in the filing of the Parent consolidated return under the


provisions of Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(2) or (3). Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(2) does not apply
in this case, because: 1) the income and deductions of Sub 1 were not included in the Parent
consolidated return, 2) Sub 1 filed a separate return for Date 2, and 3) Sub 1 was not included in
the Parent Form 851 affiliations schedule. In order to obtain relief under Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-
75(b)(3), Sub 1’s failure to join in the making of the consolidated return must have been due to a
mistake of law or fact, or to inadvertence.

Determination

It is our position that Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(3) applies in this case, and an amended return
to include Sub 1 as a member of the Parent consolidated return should be allowed.

The fact that “The Date 2 consolidated return for Taxpayer included Form 1122 Authorization
and Consent of Subsidiary Corporation To Be Included in a Consolidated Income Tax Return for
Sub 2, and the fact that “The Date 2 consolidated return for Taxpayer included Parent and Sub 2
in the Form 851 Affiliations Schedule” indicate that the Parent affiliated group intended to file a
consolidated return for the year ended Date 2. Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(a)(1) allows the Parent
affiliated group to file a consolidated return in lieu of separate returns for the Date 2 tax year,
provided that each corporation which was a member of the Parent affiliated group at any time
during Date 2 tax year joins in the filing of the Parent consolidated return. The Taxpayer states
that “at the time of the preparation of the relevant Date 2 U.S. federal income tax returns
Accounting Firm 1 [the return preparer] mistakenly believed that the inclusion of Sub 1 in the
Consolidated Return was voluntary, not mandatory.”

It is our opinion that the common Parent corporation has satisfactorily established that the failure
of Sub 1 to join in the making of the consolidated return was due to a mistake of law. If Parent
intended to exercise its privilege of filing a consolidated return, and Parent directly owned at
least 80% of the total voting power and 80% of the total value of Sub 1, then Sub 1 was required
to join in the filing of the consolidated return in order to obtain the benefits of consolidation and
should be treated as if it filed Form 1122 for the Date 2 taxable year per Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-
75(b)(3).

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations set forth above, we conclude
that pursuant to Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75(b)(3), the taxpayer may be allowed to amend their
consolidated return for the tax year ended Date 2, in order to include Sub 1 as a member of the
consolidated return as if Sub 1 had timely filed Form 1122, and therefore joined in the making of
a consolidated return.

Caveats

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the federal
income tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in this
letter or about the tax treatment of any condition existing at the time of, or effects resulting from,
any transaction or item that is not specifically covered by the above determination.


The determination contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by an

appropriate party.
Procedural Matters

This determination is directed only to the taxpayer who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

This office will associate a copy of this determination letter with the taxpayer’s federal income
tax return for the Initial Year. A copy of this determination letter should be kept in the
taxpayer’s permanent records.

Sincerely,

Scott Ballint

Digitally signed by Scott Ballint
DN: cn=Scott Ballint, o=Eastern
Compliance Practice Area, DFO Great
Lakes, ou, [email protected],
c=US
Date: 2017.03.16 19:57:37 -04'00'

Scott Ballint, Acting Director Field Operations-Great Lakes
Large Business & International
Eastern Compliance Practice Area

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.