Private Letter Ruling 201725010 Released June 23, 2017 Approved

Spouses receive 120 days to allocate GST exemption to an old trust gift

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A grantor created a trust for descendants and relatives before December 31, 2000, and transferred property to it. The grantor and spouse timely elected gift splitting on their Forms 709, but their accountant failed to allocate either spouse's generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax exemption to the transfer. After discovering the omission years later, they sought relief under section 2642(g). The IRS granted 120 days to file Forms 709 allocating their available GST exemptions to the original transfer. The allocations would be effective as of the transfer date and would use the property's value as determined for federal gift tax purposes.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the grantor and spouse make late allocations of their GST exemptions to a pre-2001 trust transfer for which they had elected gift splitting?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2513, 2631, 2632, 2642(g), and 2652; Notice 2001-50; Treas. Reg. § 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                       Department of the Treasury
                                                               Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201725010                                              Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/23/2017                                        Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.00-00, 2642.00-00
                                                               Person To Contact:
                                                               --------------------------, ID No. --------------
                                                               Telephone Number:
---------------------------                                    ----------------------
----------------------                                         Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------                     CC:PSI:4
------------------------------------------                     PLR-129579-16
                                                               PLR-139218-16
                                                               Date: March 6, 2017


         Re: --------------------------------------------



Legend

Grantor                    =        ------------------------------------------------------
Spouse                     =        -------------------------------------------------
Trust                      =        --------------------------------------------
Date 1                     =        ----------------------------
Year 1                     =        -------
Year 2                     =        -------
Accountant                 =         -------------------------------


Dear ----------------------------------:

      This letter responds to your authorized representative’s letter of September 20,
2016 and subsequent correspondence, requesting an extension of time pursuant to
§ 2642(g) of the Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100 of the Procedure and
Administration Regulations to allocate Grantor’s and Spouse’s generation-skipping tax
(GST) exemption to a trust.

FACTS

         The facts and representations submitted are as follows:

      On Date 1, in Year 1, Grantor created Trust for the benefit of his issue and his
brother’s issue, and transferred property to Trust. Date 1 is prior to December 31, 2000.
Accountant prepared and filed Forms 709 (United States Gift (and Generation-Skipping
Transfer) Tax Return, in which Grantor and Spouse elected to split the gift under
PLR-129579-16                                 2
PLR-139218-16

§ 2513. However, Accountant failed to allocate Grantor and Spouse’s respective GST
exemption to the Year 1 transfer. The failure to make the election was discovered in
Year 2.

       Grantor and Spouse request an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) and
§§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 to allocate their GST exemption to the Date 1 transfer to
Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

        Section 2513(a)(1) provides that a gift made by one spouse to any person other
than his spouse shall be considered as made one-half by him and one-half by his
spouse, but only if at the time of the gift each spouse is a citizen or resident of the
United States. Under § 2513(a)(2), paragraph (a)(1) only applies if both spouses have
signified their consent to the application of paragraph (a)(1) in the case of all such gifts
made during the calendar year by either while married to the other.

        Section 2601 imposes a tax on every generation-skipping transfer (GST).
A generation-skipping transfer is defined under § 2611(a) as (1) a taxable distribution,
(2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

       Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the
taxable amount multiplied by the applicable rate.

       Section 2641(a) defines the term “applicable rate” with respect to any GST
transfer as the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio
with respect to the transfer.

       Section 2642(a)(1) provides that the inclusion ratio with respect to any property
transferred in a GST is the excess (if any) of 1 over the “applicable fraction.” With
respect to a GST that is not a direct skip, § 2642(a)(2) provides that the applicable
fraction is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the GST exemption
allocated to the trust, and the denominator of which is the value of the property
transferred to the trust, reduced by the sum of any federal estate tax or state death tax
actually recovered from the trust attributable to such property and any charitable
deduction allowed under § 2055 or 2522 with respect to such property.

       Section 2631(a), as in effect for Year 1, provides that, for purposes of
determining the inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of
$1,000,000 which may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property
with respect to which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that
any allocation under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.
PLR-129579-16                                 3
PLR-139218-16

       Section 2632(a) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her
GST exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date
prescribed for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s estate (determined with
regard to extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

       Section 26.2632-1(b)(4)(i) of the Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax Regulations
provides that an allocation of GST exemption to property transferred during the
transferor’s lifetime, other than in a direct skip, is made on Form 709.

        Section 2652(a)(2) and § 26.2652-1(a)(4) provide that, if, under § 2513, one-half
of a gift is treated as made by an individual and one-half of such gift is treated as made
by the spouse of the individual, then for purposes of the GST tax, each spouse is
treated as the transferor of one-half of the entire value of the property transferred by the
donor spouse, regardless of the interest the electing spouse is actually deemed to have
transferred under § 2513.

        Section 2642(b)(1) provides, in part, that, except as provided in § 2642(f), if the
allocation of the GST exemption to any transfers of property is made on a gift tax return
filed on or before the date prescribed by § 6075(b) for such transfer, the value of such
property for purposes of § 2642(a) shall be its value as finally determined for purposes
of chapter 12 (within the meaning of § 2001(f)(2)) and such allocation shall be effective
on and after the date of such transfer.

       Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe
such circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to
make an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election
under § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.

       Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under
this paragraph, the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances,
including evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer
and such other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining
whether to grant relief under this paragraph, the time for making the allocation (or
election) shall be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute.

        Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time
for allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for
electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust
as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice
further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation
PLR-129579-16                                4
PLR-139218-16

described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5)
under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

      Section 301.9100-1(c) provides that the Commissioner has discretion to grant a
reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and 301.9100-3
to make a regulatory election, or a statutory election (but no more than six months
except in the case of a taxpayer who is abroad), under all subtitles of the Internal
Revenue Code except in subtitles E, G, H, and I.

       Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that, in general, requests for extensions of time
for regulatory elections that do not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2 must be
made under the rules of § 301.9100-3.

       Under § 301.9100-1(b), a regulatory election includes an election whose due
date is prescribed by a notice published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin. In accordance
with § 2642(g)(1)(B) and Notice 2001-50, taxpayers may seek an extension of time to
make an election described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5) under the provisions of § 301.9100-3.

       Requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be granted when the taxpayer
provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the Commissioner that the
taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting relief will not prejudice
the interests of the government.

      Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or to advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

        Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that
the requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Therefore, Grantor and Spouse
are granted an extension of time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate their
available GST exemption to the Date 1 transfer to Trust. The allocations will be
effective as of the date of the transfer and the value of the transfer to Trust, as
determined for federal gift tax purposes, will be used in determining the amount of
Grantor’s and Spouse’s GST exemption to be allocated to Trust. The allocations should
be made on Forms 709 for Year 1, and filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center,
Cincinnati, Ohio 45999. A copy of this letter should be attached to each Form 709. A
copy of this letter is enclosed for this purpose.

      Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied
concerning the tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or
PLR-129579-16                                  5
PLR-139218-16

referenced in this letter. Moreover, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any modification of Trust after Date 1.

      This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of
the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

         In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this
letter is being sent to your authorized representative.

      The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and
representations submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.


                                           Sincerely,

                                            Associate Chief Counsel
                                            (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


                                      By: Lorraine E. Gardner
                                          Lorraine E. Gardner, Senior Counsel
                                          Branch 4
                                          Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                          (Passthroughs & Special Industries)




Enclosures (2)

       Copy of this letter
       Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.