Private Letter Ruling 201724022 Released June 16, 2017 Approved

Donor receives more time to allocate GST exemption to a trust

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A donor transferred property to an irrevocable trust with generation-skipping transfer potential before December 31, 2000. Her accountant timely filed the gift tax return but reported the gift and GST exemption allocation incorrectly and omitted the required notice of allocation. The IRS concluded that the donor satisfied the discretionary-relief standard, based on her reliance on a qualified tax professional, and granted 120 days to allocate available GST exemption effective as of the original transfer date. The allocation must be made on a supplemental Form 709 with a copy of the ruling attached.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the donor make a late allocation of GST exemption to the trust effective as of the original transfer date?
  • Outcome: Approved. The IRS granted 120 days to file the allocation on a supplemental Form 709.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 2601, 2611, 2631, 2632, 2641, 2642; Treas. Reg. §§ 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3; Notice 2001-50

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201724022 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/16/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 2642.00-00, 9100.00-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------- ----------------, ID No. ------------------
--------------------------------- Telephone Number:
------------------------- ----------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:04
Re: -------------------- PLR-137293-16
Date:
March 06, 2017

Legend
Donor = ----------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ----------------------------
Trust = ----------------------------------
x = ------------
Accountant = -----------------------

Dear --------------:

This letter responds to the letter dated November 28, 2016, submitted by your
authorized representative, requesting an extension of time pursuant to § 2642(g) of the
Internal Revenue Code and § 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration
Regulations to allocate generation-skipping transfer (GST) exemption to a transfer to a
trust.

FACTS

The facts and representations submitted are as follows.

On Date 1, a date prior to December 31, 2000, Donor created an irrevocable trust,
Trust. Trust has GST potential. On the same date, Donor transferred $x to Trust.

Accountant prepared and timely filed Donor’s Form 709, United States Gift (and
Generation-Skipping Transfer) Tax Return, reporting the transfer to Trust. However,
Accountant improperly reported the gift on Schedule A, Part 2 (Gifts That are Direct
Skips and are Subject to Both Gift Tax and Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax). On
Schedule C, Computation of Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax, Accountant improperly
reported an allocation of Donor’s GST exemption on the incorrect line in Part 2 (GST
Exemption Reconciliation) and failed to attach a Notice of Allocation. These errors were
discovered subsequently when Donor retained new estate planning counsel. Donor

PLR-137293-16 2

represents she has sufficient GST exemption available to allocate to the Date 1 transfer
to Trust.

Donor requests an extension of time to make an election under § 2642(g) and
§§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3, to allocate GST exemption to the Date 1 transfer to
Trust, effective as of the date of the transfer to Trust.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

Section 2601 imposes a tax on every GST. A GST is defined under § 2611(a) as
(1) a taxable distribution, (2) a taxable termination, and (3) a direct skip.

Section 2602 provides that the amount of the tax imposed by § 2601 is the taxable
amount multiplied by the applicable rate. Section 2641(a) defines the applicable rate as
the product of the maximum federal estate tax rate and the inclusion ratio with respect
to the transfer.

Under § 2642(a), the inclusion ratio with respect to any property transferred in a GST is
the excess (if any) of one over the applicable fraction. The applicable fraction, as
defined in § 2642(a)(2), is a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of the GST
exemption under § 2631 allocated to the trust, and the denominator of which is the
value of the property transferred to the trust.

Section 2631(a), as in effect on Date 1, provided that for purposes of determining the
inclusion ratio, every individual shall be allowed a GST exemption of $1,000,000 which
may be allocated by such individual (or his executor) to any property with respect to
which such individual is the transferor. Section 2631(b) provides that any allocation
under § 2631(a), once made, shall be irrevocable.

Section 2632(a)(1) provides that any allocation by an individual of his or her GST
exemption under § 2631(a) may be made at any time on or before the date prescribed
for filing the estate tax return for such individual’s estate (determined with regard to
extensions), regardless of whether such a return is required to be filed.

Section 2642(g)(1)(A) provides that the Secretary shall by regulation prescribe such
circumstances and procedures under which extensions of time will be granted to make
an allocation of GST exemption described in § 2642(b)(1) or (2), and an election under
§ 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5). Such regulations shall include procedures for requesting
comparable relief with respect to transfers made before the date of the enactment of
this paragraph.

Section 2642(g)(1)(B) provides that in determining whether to grant relief under
§ 2642(g)(1), the Secretary shall take into account all relevant circumstances, including
evidence of intent contained in the trust instrument or instrument of transfer and such

PLR-137293-16 3

other factors as the Secretary deems relevant. For purposes of determining whether to
grant relief, the time for making the allocation (or election) shall be treated as if not
expressly prescribed by statute.

Notice 2001-50, 2001-2 C.B. 189, provides that under § 2642(g)(1)(B), the time for
allocating the GST exemption to lifetime transfers and transfers at death, the time for
electing out of the automatic allocation rules, and the time for electing to treat any trust
as a GST trust are to be treated as if not expressly prescribed by statute. The Notice
further provides that taxpayers may seek an extension of time to make an allocation
described in § 2642(b)(1) or (b)(2) or an election described in § 2632(b)(3) or (c)(5)
under the provisions of § 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3.

Section 301.9100-3 provides the standards used to determine whether to grant an
extension of time to make an election whose due date is prescribed by a regulation (and
not expressly provided by statute).

Section 301.9100-3(a) provides, in part, that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will
be granted when the taxpayer provides the evidence to establish to the satisfaction of
the Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and that
granting relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

Section 301.9100-3(b)(1)(v) provides that a taxpayer is deemed to have acted
reasonably and in good faith if the taxpayer reasonably relied on a qualified tax
professional, including a tax professional employed by the taxpayer, and the tax
professional failed to make, or advise the taxpayer to make, the election.

Based on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude that the
requirements of § 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Donor is granted an extension of
time of 120 days from the date of this letter to allocate her available GST exemption to
the transfer made to Trust on Date 1.

The allocation should be made on a supplemental Form 709 and filed with the
Cincinnati Service Center at the following address: Internal Revenue Service,
Cincinnati Service Center — Stop 82, Cincinnati, OH 45999. A copy of this letter should
be attached to the return.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied concerning the
tax consequences of any aspect of any transaction or item discussed or referenced in
this letter.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

PLR-137293-16 4

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representative.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)


                                   Lorraine E. Gardner
                                By:______________________________
                                   Lorraine E. Gardner
                                   Senior Counsel, Branch 4
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures (2)
Copy of the letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.