Private Letter Ruling 201723010 Released June 9, 2017 Approved

Taxpayer receives relief for a late accounting-method application

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A taxpayer missed the deadline to file Form 3115 seeking consent to change its overall accounting method from cash to accrual, with an IRC § 481(a) adjustment. Accounting-method relief normally faces a stricter standard because the government's interests are deemed prejudiced unless unusual and compelling circumstances exist. The IRS concluded that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith and that relief would not prejudice the government, so it treated the submitted Form 3115 as timely. The ruling did not approve the accounting-method change itself, which remained subject to separate review.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: May the taxpayer's late Form 3115 be treated as timely filed?
  • Outcome: Approved. The application is timely, but permission for the proposed method change remains undecided.
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 446, 481(a); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.446-1(e), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3(c)(2)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201723010 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/9/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.10-00, 9100.10-01
Person To Contact:
--------------------------------------------- -------------------, ID No. ------------
-------------------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
------------------------------------------ CC:ITA:B06
------------------------------------------ PLR-128939-16
------------------------------------ Date:
March 08, 2017

Legend

Taxpayer = ---------------------------------------------
Date 1 = ---------------------------
Year 2 = -------
Date 3 = --------------------------

Dear ---------------:

This letter responds to Taxpayer’s request, dated Date 1, for an extension of time under
§ 301.9100-1(c) of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to file a Form 3115,
Application for Change in Accounting Method, for Year 2. Taxpayer failed to file its
Form 3115 by the due date, Date 3, and instead submitted it to this office with this
request for an extension of time.

Taxpayer would like to obtain permission to change its overall method of accounting
from the cash receipts and disbursements method to an accrual method of accounting
for Year 2. The accounting method change that Taxpayer proposes to make requires
an adjustment under § 481(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Generally, a taxpayer that fails to make an election timely may submit a request for
relief under §§ 301.9100-1 through -3, to obtain an extension of time to make the
desired election. For this purpose, § 301.9100-1(b) defines an election as including a
request to adopt, change, or retain an accounting method.

To obtain an extension of time to make a regulatory election that does not meet the
requirements of § 301.9100-2 (automatic extensions), such as in the instant case, a
taxpayer must satisfy the requirements set forth in § 301.9100-3. A request for relief
subject to § 301.9100-3 is granted when the taxpayer demonstrates to the satisfaction

PLR-128939-16 2

of the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue that it acted reasonably and in good faith,
and that granting the relief will not prejudice the interests of the Government. See id.

Special rules apply for determining whether the Government’s interests are prejudiced
when a taxpayer seeks relief with respect to an accounting method regulatory election.
See § 301.9100-3(c)(2). If the taxpayer’s intended election is subject to the advance
consent procedure described in § 1.446-1(e)(3)(i) of the Income Tax Regulations or
requires an adjustment under § 481(a), the Government's interests are deemed to be
prejudiced except in unusual and compelling circumstances. See id.

The information furnished by Taxpayer demonstrates to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that it acted reasonably and in good faith, and that granting an extension
of time to make the desired regulatory election would not prejudice the interests of the
Government. Accordingly, the Form 3115 that Taxpayer submitted with its request for
an extension of time under § 301.9100-1(c) will be considered as timely filed for Year 2.

Except as expressly provided herein, no opinion is expressed or implied as to the
application of any provisions of the Code or the regulations that may be applicable to
the transaction. The extension of time to file a Form 3115 granted in this ruling is not a
determination that Taxpayer will be permitted to change its accounting method as
proposed. That determination will be made separately upon the review of Taxpayer’s
Form 3115.

This ruling is directed only to Taxpayer, who requested it. Section 6110(k)(3) provides
that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to Taxpayer’s authorized representative.

The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations
submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by the appropriate penalty of perjury
statements. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in support of

PLR-128939-16 3

the request for this ruling, all information and representations is subject to verification on
examination.

                                   Sincerely,



                                   Cheryl L. Oseekey
                                   Senior Counsel, Branch 6
                                   Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                   (Income Tax & Accounting)

Enclosure
Copy for § 6110 purposes

cc:

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.