Taxpayer receives relief to opt out of bonus depreciation for seven years

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group intended not to claim additional first-year depreciation for every class of qualified property placed in service over seven tax years. Its returns, depreciation calculations, asset-disposition calculations, and financial statements consistently reflected that choice, but it failed to attach the required election statements. The IRS concluded that the group satisfied the discretionary-relief requirements and granted 60 days to make the elections under IRC § 168(k). For open years the parent must file amended consolidated returns, while for closed years it must file written statements with the office where the original returns were filed.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: May the taxpayer make late elections out of bonus depreciation for qualified property placed in service over seven tax years?
• Outcome: Approved. The taxpayer received 60 days to file the required amended returns and statements.
• Key authorities: IRC § 168(k); Treas. Reg. §§ 1.168(k)-1(e), 301.9100-1, 301.9100-3

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201723007 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 6/9/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 9100.04-00
Person To Contact:
-------------------------- -------------------------, ID No. -----------------
--------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- Telephone Number:
---------------------
------------------------------ Refer Reply To:
-------------------------------- CC:ITA:7
PLR-128511-16
Date:
February 22, 2017

Re: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LEGEND:

Parent = ----------------------------------------------------
S1 = -----------------------------------------------------------
Year 1 = -------
Year 2 = -------
Year 3 = -------
Year 4 = -------
Year 5 = -------
Year 6 = -------
Year 7 = -------

Dear ------------------:

  This letter responds to a letter dated September 13, 2016, and subsequent

correspondence, submitted by Parent on behalf of itself and S1 (hereinafter, Parent and
S1 are collectively referred to as Taxpayer) requesting an extension of time pursuant to
§ 301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election not
to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) of the Internal Revenue
Code for all classes of qualified property placed in service during the taxable years Year
1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7.

PLR-128511-16 2

   Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this letter to § 168 are treated as a

reference to § 168 of the Internal Revenue Code as in effect on the day before the date
of the enactment of the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 (PATH Act),
enacted as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2016, Division Q, Pub. L. 114-
113, 129 Stat. 2242 (December 18, 2015).

FACTS

   Taxpayer represents that the facts are as follows:

   Parent is the common parent of an affiliated group of corporations that includes

S1. The affiliated group of corporations files a consolidated federal income tax return
on a calendar-year basis. Taxpayer’s principal business activity is the manufacturing
and marketing of beauty and related products. As of the date of filing this letter ruling
request, Taxpayer’s taxable years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, and Year 5 are
taxable years for which the period of limitation on assessment under § 6501(a) has
expired.

   Taxpayer placed in service qualified property (as defined in § 168(k)(2) before

the application of § 168(k)(2)(D)(iii)) that is 3-year, 5-year, 7-year, 10-year, or 15-year
property, qualified leasehold improvement property and computer software, during the
taxable years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7. For each of
these taxable years, Taxpayer decided to make the election under § 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) not
to claim the additional first year depreciation under §§ 168(k)(1) or 168(k)(5), as
applicable, with respect to each class of qualified property.

    On Parent’s timely filed consolidated federal income tax returns for the taxable

years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7, Taxpayer did not
deduct the additional first year depreciation for qualified property placed in service
during those years. However, Taxpayer inadvertently failed to attach to the return for
the taxable years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7, the
election statement not to claim the additional first year depreciation deduction for such
qualified property, as required by § 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) of the Income Tax Regulations.

    For the placed-in-service year and each subsequent taxable year, Taxpayer

determined the depreciation deductions under § 168 for the qualified property at issue
as if Taxpayer had made timely the aforementioned election not to deduct the additional
first year depreciation. Taxpayer has disposed of some of the property subject to this
ruling request. In determining the gain or loss for such disposed property, Taxpayer
reduced the basis of such property for the greater of the allowed or allowable
depreciation as if that election had been made timely by Taxpayer.

   Further, the tax provision in Taxpayer’s financial statements for the taxable years

at issue was calculated on the basis that Taxpayer had made timely the aforementioned

PLR-128511-16 3

election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation for the qualified property at
issue.

RULING REQUESTED

  Taxpayer requests an extension of time pursuant to §§ 301.9100-1 and

301.9100-3 of the Procedure and Administration Regulations to make the election not to
deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all classes of qualified
property placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3,
Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7.

LAW AND ANALYSIS

   Section 168(k)(1) allows, in the taxable year that qualified property is placed in

service, a 50-percent additional first year depreciation deduction for qualified property (i)
acquired by a taxpayer after December 31, 2007, and before September 9, 2010, or
after December 31, 2011 (or December 31, 2012, for qualified property described in
§§ 168(k)(2)(B) or 168(k)(2)(C)) and before January 1, 2015, and (ii) placed in service
by the taxpayer before September 9, 2010, or after December 31, 2011(or December
31, 2012, for qualified property described in §§ 168(k)(2)(B) or 168(k)(2)(C)) and before
January 1, 2015 (or January 1, 2016, for qualified property described in §§ 168(k)(2)(B)
or 168(k)(2)(C)).

   Section 168(k)(5) provides a 100-percent additional first year depreciation

deduction in the placed-in-service year for qualified property acquired by a taxpayer
after September 8, 2010, and generally before January 1, 2012, and placed in service
by the taxpayer after September 8, 2010, and generally before January 1, 2012. See
section 3 of Rev. Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B. 664, 665.

    Section 168(k)(2)(D)(iii) provides that a taxpayer may elect not to deduct the

additional first year depreciation for any class of property placed in service during the
taxable year. The term “class of property” is defined in § 1.168(k)-1(e)(2) as meaning, in
general, each class of property described in § 168(e) (for example, 5-year property).
See section 5.01 of Rev. Proc. 2008-54, 2008-2 C.B. 722, and section 3.01 of Rev.
Proc. 2011-26, 2011-16 I.R.B. at 665 (rules similar to the rules in § 1.168(k)-1 for
“qualified property” or for “30-percent additional first year depreciation deduction” apply
for purposes of § 168(k) as currently in effect).

   Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(i) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made by the due date (including extensions) of the federal
tax return for the taxable year in which the property is placed in service by the taxpayer.

  Section 1.168(k)-1(e)(3)(ii) provides that the election not to deduct additional first

year depreciation must be made in the manner prescribed on Form 4562, “Depreciation

PLR-128511-16 4

and Amortization,” and its instructions. The instructions to Form 4562 for the taxable
years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3, Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7 provided that the
election not to deduct the additional first year depreciation is made by attaching a
statement to the taxpayer’s timely filed tax return indicating that the taxpayer is electing
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation and the class of property for which
the taxpayer is making the election.

   Under § 301.9100-1, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has discretion to

grant a reasonable extension of time under the rules set forth in §§ 301.9100-2 and
301.9100-3 to make a regulatory election.

   Sections 301.9100-1 through 301.9100-3 provide the standards the

Commissioner will use to determine whether to grant an extension of time to make an
election. Section 301.9100-2 provides automatic extensions of time for making certain
elections. Section 301.9100-3 provides extensions of time for making elections that do
not meet the requirements of § 301.9100-2.

    Section 301.9100-3(a) provides that requests for relief under § 301.9100-3 will be

granted when the taxpayer provides evidence to establish to the satisfaction of the
Commissioner that the taxpayer acted reasonably and in good faith, and the grant of
relief will not prejudice the interests of the government.

CONCLUSIONS

   Based solely on the facts and representations submitted, we conclude that the

requirements of §§ 301.9100-1 and 301.9100-3 have been satisfied. Accordingly,
Taxpayer is granted 60 calendar days from the date of this letter to make the election
not to deduct the additional first year depreciation under § 168(k) for all classes of
property placed in service by Taxpayer during the taxable years Year 1, Year 2, Year 3,
Year 4, Year 5, Year 6, and Year 7, that qualify for the additional first year depreciation
deduction. This election must be made by Parent by: (i) filing an amended consolidated
federal income tax return for each such taxable year that is an open taxable year as of
the date provided in the preceding sentence, with a written statement indicating that
Taxpayer is electing not to deduct the additional first year depreciation and identifying
the class(es) of property for which the election is made; and (ii) filing a written statement
with such information with the IRS office where Parent filed its original consolidated
federal income tax return(s) for any taxable year(s) at issue that is a closed taxable
year(s) as of the date provided in the preceding sentence.

    A copy of this letter ruling must be attached to any federal income tax return to

which it is relevant or to the written statement, as applicable. A copy is enclosed for that
purpose. Alternatively, a taxpayer filing its federal income tax return electronically may
satisfy this requirement by attaching a statement to the return that provides the date and
control number of the letter ruling.

PLR-128511-16 5

   Except as specifically set forth above, no opinion is expressed or implied

concerning the federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other
provisions of the Code (including other subsections of § 168). Specifically, no opinion is
expressed or implied on whether any item of depreciable property placed in service by
Taxpayer during the taxable years at issue is eligible for the additional first year
depreciation deduction.

  The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and

representations submitted by Taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury
statement executed by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the
material submitted in support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on
examination.

  This letter ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3)

provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

    In accordance with the power of attorney, we are sending a copy of this letter

ruling to Parent’s authorized representatives. We also are sending a copy of this letter
ruling to the appropriate operating division director.

                                             Sincerely,

                                             Kathleen Reed

                                             KATHLEEN REED
                                             Branch Chief, Branch 7
                                             Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                             (Income Tax and Accounting)

Enclosures (2):
copy of this letter
copy for section 6110 purposes