Training lesson revises collection limitation suspension guidance

Number
201721016
Outcome
Advice
Document type
Chief Counsel Advice
IRS subject
Suspension of Running of Period of Limitation
Code sections
§ 6503
Ruling dated
March 14, 2017
Publicly released
May 26, 2017

Apply this to your situation

This page covers legal advice the IRS Office of Chief Counsel wrote for IRS staff, issued in 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current Code and IRS guidance say, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It is advice from the IRS Office of Chief Counsel to IRS personnel on the facts they presented, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

Chief Counsel reported that a levy, seizure, and sale training lesson had been revised to correct legal inaccuracies in its discussion of IRC § 6503 suspensions. The revision expanded the explanation of how suspension works in jeopardy situations. It also added a practice tip to refer the matter to “DJ” when the nominal collection statute expiration date begins to run, even though the IRS position is that the deadline is extended. The short message provides no further facts or legal analysis.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: What revisions were made to the training lesson's discussion of limitation-period suspensions?
  • Outcome: Advice given. The lesson corrects inaccuracies, expands jeopardy guidance, and adds a referral practice tip.
  • Key authorities: IRC § 6503

Full text (IRS public release)

ID: CCA_2017031413035557
UILC: 6503.00-00

Number: 201721016
Release Date: 5/26/2017
From:
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2017 1:03:55 PM
To:
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Lesson 8 (Levy Seizure Sale)

-----,

FYI, the discussion on section 6503 suspensions has been revised in the above- referenced lesson (the current one in the 2017 GL1 drive). Legal inaccuracies have been cleaned up and there is a beefed up discussion of how the suspension operates in jeopardy situations. It also has a practice tip (refer to DJ as the nominal CSED begins to run, even though our position is that there is a CSED extension).

Let me know if have any questions.

-------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------
-------------------------

What does the Code say today, for your facts?

This advice was written for IRS staff and cannot be cited. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance against your situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace