Private Letter Ruling 201718034 Released May 5, 2017 Approved

Consolidated group may switch to tax-book-value asset valuation

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

A consolidated group and a related domestic corporation had used the fair-market-value method to value assets when apportioning interest expense. After the group acquired another consolidated group that had used tax book value, the group and the related corporation separately requested permission to change methods. The regulations generally require a taxpayer and related persons to continue using fair market value unless the Commissioner authorizes a change. The IRS allowed all members of the requesting consolidated group to use tax book value for the group's redacted taxable year and future years when apportioning interest expense under all operative sections, including sections 199 and 904.

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Could the consolidated group change from fair-market-value to tax-book-value asset valuation for interest-expense apportionment?
  • Outcome: approved
  • Key authorities: IRC §§ 199, 864(e), 904; Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8(f)(2), 1.861-8T(c)(2), and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service                                     Department of the Treasury
                                                             Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201718034                                            [Third Party Communication:
Release Date: 5/5/2017                                       Date of Communication: Month DD, YYYY]
Index Number: 861.09-00, 861.09-06,
              861.09-07                                      Person To Contact:
                                                             ------------------------, ID No. ------------------
-----------------------------------                          ----------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------                    Telephone Number:
-----------------------                                      ----------------------
-------------------------------                              Refer Reply To:
                                                             [CC:INTL:B03]
                                                             PLR-139090-16
                                                             Date:
                                                             February 03, 2017


TY: -------


CORP A             = ----------------------
CORP B             = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     -------------------------------------
CORP C             = ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     ----------------------------------------
CORP D             = ----------------
COUNTRY            = ----------
Z
DATE 1             = -------------------



Dear ---------------:

This is in response to your representative’s letter dated December 19, 2016, requesting
a ruling on behalf of CORP B’s consolidated group that the consolidated group
members be permitted to value their assets on the basis of the tax book value method
of asset valuation for purposes of the consolidated group’s ------- taxable year.

The rulings contained in this letter are based upon information and representations
submitted by CORP B and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed by
an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted in
support of the request for rulings, it is subject to verification on examination.

CORP B, a domestic corporation, is a calendar year taxpayer that uses the accrual
method as its overall method of accounting. CORP B is the common parent of a group
of affiliated corporations that files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. CORP
PLR-139090-16                                  2

B consolidated group utilized the fair market value method of asset valuation for taxable
years prior to taxable year -------.

CORP B is wholly owned by CORP A. CORP A is a corporation created under the laws
of COUNTRY Z. CORP A also wholly owns CORP C. CORP C is a domestic
corporation that is not part of the CORP B consolidated group. CORP B and CORP C
are related persons within the meaning of Treas. Reg. § 1.861-8T(c)(2). Accordingly,
CORP C also utilized the fair market value method of asset valuation for taxable years
prior to taxable year -------. CORP C is simultaneously requesting to value its assets on
the basis of the tax book value method.

On DATE 1, a date in calendar year -------, CORP B completed the acquisition of CORP
D, the common parent of a U.S. consolidated group of corporations. For several years
prior to DATE 1, the CORP D consolidated group utilized the tax book value method of
asset valuation. As a result of the acquisition, the CORP D consolidated group
members became members of the CORP B consolidated group and will be included in
the CORP B consolidated federal income tax return starting from the day after DATE 1.

Section 864(e) provides that all allocations and apportionments of interest expense shall
be made on the basis of assets rather than gross income. Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8
through 1.861-12 and Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8T through 1.861-13T set forth the rules
specific to the allocation and apportionment of interest expense. Treas. Reg. 1.861-
9T(g)(1)(ii) provides that a taxpayer may elect to determine the value of its assets on
the basis of either tax book value or the fair market value of its assets. Treas. Reg. §
1.861-8T(c)(2) provides that, once a taxpayer uses the fair market value method, the
taxpayer and all related persons must continue to use such method unless expressly
authorized by the Commissioner to change methods.

Based solely on the information submitted and the representations made, pursuant to
Treas. Reg. § 1.861-8(f)(2) and Treas. Reg. §§ 1.861-8T(c)(2) and 1.861-9T(g)(1)(ii),
the CORP B consolidated group members may value their assets on the basis of the tax
book value method of asset valuation for purposes of apportioning interest expense for
all operative sections, including sections 199 and 904 of the Code, for the consolidated
group’s ------- taxable year and future years.

This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer requesting it. Section 6110(k)(3) of the Code
provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.

In accordance with the Power of Attorney on file with this office, a copy of this letter is
being sent to your authorized representatives.

A copy of this letter must be attached to any income tax return to which it is relevant.
Alternatively, taxpayers filing their returns electronically may satisfy this requirement by
PLR-139090-16                                  3

attaching a statement to their return that provides the date and control number of the
letter ruling.




                                  Sincerely,



                                  Jeffrey L. Parry
                                  Senior Counsel, Branch 3
                                  Office of Associate Chief Counsel (International)

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.