Corporation retains S status after trust misses ESBT election

Plain-English summary

An estate transferred shares of an S corporation to a trust that could hold the shares for two years without making a special election. The trust failed to elect electing small business trust status when that period ended, which terminated the corporation's S election. The corporation continued filing as an S corporation and represented that the failure was inadvertent rather than tax-motivated. The IRS allowed the corporation to retain continuous S status, provided the trustee filed an ESBT election effective on the termination date within 120 days. The ruling would be void if that condition was not met.

Ruling snapshot

• Question: Could the corporation retain S status after a shareholder trust failed to make a timely ESBT election?
• Outcome: approved
• Key authorities: IRC §§ 1361(c), 1361(e), and 1362(f)

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
Washington, DC 20224

Number: 201716006 Third Party Communication: None
Release Date: 4/21/2017 Date of Communication: Not Applicable
Index Number: 1362.04-00
Person To Contact:
----------------------------- ------------------------, ID No. ------------------
---------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------- Telephone Number:
----------------------------------------------- ---------------------
Refer Reply To:
CC:PSI:B3
PLR-122761-16
Date: January 13, 2017

LEGEND

X = ------------------------------

               ---------------------------

A = ----------------------

Trust = ----------------------------------------
-------------------
------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------

State = -----------

Date 1 = --------------------------

Date 2 = ------------------

Date 3 = --------------------

Date 4 = -----------------------

Date 5 = ---------------------------

Date 6 = ----------------------------

n = --------------
PLR-122761-16 2

Dear --------------:

  This letter responds to a letter dated July 19, 2016, submitted on behalf of X,

requesting a ruling under § 1362(f) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code).

FACTS

   The information submitted states that X, was formed as a corporation under the

laws of State on Date1. X converted to a limited liability company under the laws of
State on Date 2. A died on Date 3. X elected to be an S corporation effective Date 4.
On Date 5, the estate of A transferred n% of X shares to Trust.

    Trust qualified under §1361(c)(2)(A)(iii) as an eligible S corporation shareholder

for a two-year period beginning when the shares of X were transferred to it Date 5. A
timely election to treat Trust as an Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT) was not made
Date 6, thus causing X's S election to terminate on Date 6. Beginning Date 6, X
represents that Trust was a trust that met the qualifications to be an EBST, except that
no EBST election had been timely filed on the behalf of Trust.

   X represents that X has filed tax returns consistent with X being an S corporation

since Date 6. X further represents that the circumstances resulting in the termination of
X's S corporation election were inadvertent and were not motivated by tax avoidance or
retroactive tax planning. X and its shareholders have agreed to make such adjustments
consistent with the treatment of X as an S corporation as may be required by the
Secretary.

LAW

    Section 1362(f) provides, in part, that if (1) an election under § 1362(a) by any

corporation (A) was not effective for the taxable year for which made (determined
without regard to § 1362(b)(2)) by reason of a failure to meet the requirements of
§ 1361(b) or to obtain shareholder consents or (B) was terminated under § 1362(d)(2)
or (3), (2) the Secretary determines that the circumstances resulting in the
ineffectiveness or termination were inadvertent, (3) no later than a reasonable period of
time after discovery of the circumstances resulting in the ineffectiveness or termination,
steps were taken (A) so that the corporation is a small business corporation or (B) to
acquire the required shareholder consents, and (4) the corporation and each person
who was a shareholder of the corporation at any time during the period specified
pursuant to § 1362(f), agrees to make such adjustments (consistent with the treatment
of the corporation as an S corporation) as may be required by the Secretary with
respect to such period, then, notwithstanding the circumstances resulting in the
PLR-122761-16 3

ineffectiveness or termination, the corporation will be treated as an S corporation during
the period specified by the Secretary.

CONCLUSION

    Based solely on the facts submitted and the representations made, we conclude

that X's S corporation election terminated on Date 6 when the trustee of Trust failed to
file an ESBT election under § 1361(e)(3) for Trust. We further conclude that the
termination of X's S corporation election on Date 6 was inadvertent within the meaning
of § 1362(f). Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of § 1362(f), X will be treated as
continuing to be an S corporation on Date 6 and thereafter, provided that X's S
corporation election was valid and not otherwise terminated under § 1362(d).

    This ruling is contingent upon the trustee of Trust filing an ESBT election on

behalf of Trust with an effective date of Date 6. This election must be filed with the
appropriate service center within 120 days of the date of this letter ruling. A copy of this
letter should be attached to the election.

   If the above conditions are not met, then this letter ruling is null and void.

Furthermore, if these conditions are not met, X must send a notification that its S
corporation election has terminated to the service center with which X's S corporation
election was filed.

   Except as specifically set forth above, we express no opinion concerning the

federal tax consequences of the facts described above under any other provision of the
Code. Specifically, we express no opinion regarding whether X is eligible to be an S
corporation or whether Trust is eligible to be an ESBT.

   The ruling contained in this letter is based upon information and representations

submitted by the taxpayer and accompanied by a penalty of perjury statement executed
by an appropriate party. While this office has not verified any of the material submitted
in support of the ruling request, it is subject to verification on examination.

   This ruling is directed only to the taxpayer that requested it. Section 6110(k)(3)

of the Code provides that it may not be used or cited as precedent.
PLR-122761-16 4

  In accordance with a power of attorney on file with this office, we are sending a

copy of this letter to your authorized representatives.

                                 Sincerely,



                                 Bradford R Poston
                                 Senior Counsel, Branch 3
                                 Office of Associate Chief Counsel
                                 (Passthroughs & Special Industries)

Enclosures: Copy of this letter
Copy for § 6110 purposes