Determination Letter 201702041 Released January 13, 2017 Denied Transcribed from scan

Restaurant operations defeat charitable exemption

Apply this to your situation

This page covers one taxpayer's ruling from 2017, which can't be cited as precedent. Ezel answers your situation under the current Code and IRS guidance, with citations.

Currency note: this determination was released in 2017
Statutory amendments, regulation changes, court decisions, or later IRS guidance may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current tax advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or position mentioned here.
Not precedent. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6110(k)(3), this written determination may not be used or cited as precedent. It resolved one taxpayer's situation on its specific facts, and identifying details were redacted by the IRS before release. The official IRS release (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source.
About this page: The plain-English summary and ruling snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official IRS release. The full text is the IRS's own document.
Transcribed from a scanned original: the IRS released this determination as an image-only PDF. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the original PDF before quoting exact language.
View official IRS release (PDF)

Plain-English summary

An organization proposed domestic-violence education, survivor assistance, youth programs, and other charitable activities, but expected two public restaurants to provide most of its revenue. The restaurants would use ordinary menus and hours, buy ingredients from vendors, employ compensated workers described as volunteers, and compete with commercial restaurants. The organization argued that the restaurants also shared educational resources, employed disadvantaged people, and raised money for its other programs. The IRS concluded that those charitable and educational elements were insubstantial compared with the daily restaurant operations. Because operating the restaurants was a substantial nonexempt commercial purpose, the IRS denied exemption under section 501(c)(3).

Ruling snapshot

  • Question: Does operating public restaurants to fund and support charitable programs satisfy the section 501(c)(3) operational test?
  • Outcome: denied; Appeals issued a final adverse determination
  • Key authorities: IRC § 501(c)(3); Treas. Reg. § 1.501(c)(3)-1; Rev. Rul. 71-581; Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner

Full text (IRS public release)

Internal Revenue Service
Appeals Office

San Jose Appeals, MS-7100
55 S. Market St., Suite 440
San Jose, CA 95113

Release Number: 201702041
Release Date: 1/13/2017
Date: October 17, 2016

Department of the Treasury

Employer Identification Number:

Person to Contact:

Employee ID #:
Tel:
Fax:

UIL:
501.36-00
501.36-01

Certified Mail

Dear :

This is a final adverse determination that you do not qualify for exemption from Federal income tax under
Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) section 501(a) as an organization described in Code section
501(c)(3).
The adverse determination was made for the following reason(s):

You have not demonstrated that you are operated exclusively for exempt purposes within the
meaning of Internal Revenue Code § 501(c)(3) and Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1. While you
conduct some educational and charitable activities, your primary activity is operation of food service
establishments, a presumptively commercial activity, in a manner similar to comparable for-profit
establishments.

Contributions to you are not deductible under section 170 of the Code.

You are required to file Federal income tax returns on Forms 1120. File your return with the appropriate
Internal Revenue Service Center per the instructions of the return. For further instructions, forms, and
information please visit www.irs.gov.

We will make this letter and the proposed adverse determination letter available for public inspection
under Code section 6110 after deleting certain identifying information. We have provided to you, in a
separate mailing, Notice 437, Notice of Intention to Disclose. Please review the Notice 437 and the
documents attached that show our proposed deletions. If you disagree with our proposed deletions, follow
the instructions in Notice 437.

If you decide to contest this determination, you may file an action for declaratory judgment under the
provisions of section 7428 of the Code in one of the following three venues: 1) United States Tax Court,
2) the United States Court of Federal Claims, or 3) the United States District Court for the District of
Columbia. A petition or complaint in one of these three courts must be filed within 90 days from the date
this determination letter was mailed to you. Please contact the clerk of the appropriate court for rules and
the appropriate forms for filing petitions for declaratory judgment by referring to the enclosed Publication

  1. You may write to the courts at the following addresses:

United States Tax Court
400 Second Street, NW
Washington, DC 20217

US Court of Federal Claims
717 Madison Place, NW
Washington, DC 20005

U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia
333 Constitution Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20001

Processing of income tax returns and assessments of any taxes due will not be delayed should a petition
for declaratory judgment be filed under section 7428 of the Code.

You also have the right to contact the office of the Taxpayer Advocate. Taxpayer Advocate assistance is
not a substitute for established IRS procedures, such as the formal appeals process. The Taxpayer
Advocate cannot reverse a legally correct tax determination, or extend the time fixed by law that you have
to file a petition in a United States Court. The Taxpayer Advocate can, however, see that a tax matter
that may not have been resolved through normal channels get prompt and proper handling. If you want
Taxpayer Advocate assistance, please contact the Taxpayer Advocate for the IRS office that issued this
letter. You may call toll-free, 1-877-777-4778, for the Taxpayer Advocate or visit www.irs.gov/advocate
for more information.

If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone number are shown in
the heading of this letter.

Sincerely Yours,

Appeals Team Manager

Enclosure: Publication 892

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Date: September 9, 2015

Employer ID number:

Contact person/ID number:

Contact telephone number:

Contact fax number:

Legend

B= Program
C= Program
D= Program

E= Organization
F= Program

G= Organization
H= Restaurant

K= Date
L= Program
M= State

N= Program
P= Restaurant
Q= Restaurant
R= Program
S= Program
T= Board Member
U= Board Member
V= Board Member
W= Board Member

X= Number
Y= Number
Z= Number

J dollar= Amount

UIL:
501.36-00
501.36-01

Dear

We considered your application for recognition of exemption from federal income tax under Section 501(a) of
the Internal Revenue Code (Code). Based on the information provided, we determined that you don’t qualify for

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

exemption under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. This letter explains the basis for our conclusion. Please keep it
for your records.

Issues

Do you qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code? No, for the reasons stated below.

Facts

You formed as a nonprofit unincorporated association. Your organizing document states that your purpose is
to, “Become West M’s first public, 501(c)(3) Charitable Organization that re-innovates charity by helping an
area where the unemployment rate is higher than the State and National averages through lessening Government
burdens by providing financial assistance to volunteers, helping local vendors by using their products, helping
Communities with the battle of obesity by serving locally grown ingredients in healthy, freshly prepared meals,
helping others in need by donating to similar charities with known community service programs, helping
domestic violence victims transition into world-impacting survivors through L, and helping end domestic
violence by educating the public to the ugly truths about the #1 under-reported crime in the world, how to end
it, and who to contact for help .” Your goals include teaching students and the public that violence is a choice
and providing victims with the opportunity to safely transition to survivors through the L.

You plan to operate several programs, the first of which is the L where you will assist victims of domestic
violence with transitional tools. You will begin this program once enough funds have been raised. Your second
program is the R where you educate students about teen dating and domestic violence and provide resources to
those who need help. You also have an S where you educate and provide resources to the general public.

Your previous work in the service industry showed you that people want to be rewarded for spending money so
“you came up with a concept of, “rewarding ‘customers’ with tax deductible receipts in areas where they are
already spending the money as a ‘thank you’ for helping the foundation reach its goals of ending domestic
violence and re-innovating charity through its N.” Your N will be your primary source of funding and consists
of the operation of two restaurants, P and Q. You have signed five year lease agreements for each of these
locations and they will be “farm to table” public eateries. Through these restaurants, you will purchase goods
from local vendors, serve locally grown ingredients, and compensate “volunteers” for the work they perform at
the restaurants. You state that you will reward “customers” with tax deductible receipts for spending money on
freshly prepared meals. Your financial projections show that approximately Y percent of your revenue will
come from the restaurants and approximately Z percent of your expenses will be for salaries and wages. X
percent of your monthly revenue will be donated to other organizations that are dedicated to helping others in
need. In the future, you hope to expand your fundraising activities to include two additional N, one in the
wedding industry and another in the entertainment industry.

Other fundraising activities you conduct include accepting donations on your website, holding a 5K run/walk,
holding raffles for prizes, and soliciting donations via mail, email, and in person.

There are currently four members of your Board of Directors. The two founders, T and U, are married and
serve as Co-Presidents. They have a combined experience of 46 years in the service and hospitality industries.
The two remaining board members, V and W, are also married. Once the N are open to the public, T and U will

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

dedicate all of their time and efforts to operating the programs. V and W will also work full time for you once
your finances are able to provide reasonable compensation for them.

Law

Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code provides, in part, for the exemption from federal income tax of
organizations organized and operated exclusively for charitable, religious or educational purposes, no part of the
net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Income Tax Regulations states that, in order to be exempt as an organization
described in section 501(c)(3) of the Code, an organization must be both organized and operated exclusively for
one or more of the purposes specified in such section. If an organization fails to meet either the organizational
test or the operational test, it is not exempt.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Regulations provides that an organization will be regarded as “operated
exclusively” of one or more exempt purposes only if it engages primarily in activities which accomplish one or
more of such exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. An organization will not be so
regarded if more than an insubstantial part of its activities is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) of the Regulations provides that the term “charitable” is used in section 501(c)(3) of
the Code in its generally accepted legal sense and includes relief of the poor and distressed or of the
underprivileged as well as the advancement of education.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3) of the Regulations provides that the term “educational” refers to the instruction or
training of the individual for the purpose of improving or developing his capabilities, or the instruction of the
public on subjects useful to the individual and beneficial to the community.

Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(e)(1) of the Regulations provides that an organization may meet the requirements of
section 501(c)(3) although it operates a trade or business as a substantial part of its activities, if the operation of
such trade or business is in furtherance of the organization's exempt purpose or purposes and if the organization
is not organized or operated for the primary purposes of carrying on an unrelated trade or business.

In Rev. Rul. 69-177, 1969-1 C.B. 150, the Service held that an organization, wholly owned by a tax exempt
college, that manufactures and sells wood products primarily to employ students of the college to enable them
to continue their education does not qualify for exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

In Rev. Rul. 71-581, 1971-2 C.B. 236, the Service held that the operation of a separately incorporated thrift
shop to raise funds for a group of organizations exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Code qualifies for
exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Substantially all of the goods in the thrift shop had been
donated and more than half of the work was performed without compensation.

In Rev. Rul. 73-127, 1973-1 C.B. 221, the Service held that a nonprofit organization that operates a cut-price ~
retail grocery outlet and allocates a small portion of its earnings to provide on-the-job training the hard-core
unemployed does not qualify for exemption from income tax.

In Rev. Rul. 76-94, 1976-1 C.B. 171, the Service held that an exempt organization's operation of a retail grocery
store as part of its therapeutic program for emotionally disturbed adolescents, almost fully staffed by the

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

adolescents, and on a scale no larger than was reasonably necessary for the performance of the organization's
exempt functions, was not unrelated trade or business.

In Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), the Supreme Court
held that the presence of a single non-exempt purpose, if substantial in nature, will destroy a claim for
exemption regardless of the number or importance of truly exempt purposes.

In Nelson v. Commissioner, 30 T.C. 1151 (1958), the court held that an applicant for tax exempt status under
section 501(c)(3) has the burden of showing it “comes squarely within the terms of the laws conferring the
benefit sought.”

In American Institute for Economic Research v. United States, 302 F.2d 934 (Ct. Cl. 1962), the Court
considered the status of an organization that provided analysis of securities and industries and of the economic
climate in general. It sold subscriptions to various periodicals and services providing advice for purchases of
individual securities. The Court concluded that the totality of the organization's activities, which included the
sale of many publications as well as the sale of advice for a fee to individuals, was more indicative of a business
than that of an educational organization. The Court held that the organization had a significant non-exempt
commercial purpose that was not incidental to the educational purpose and that the organization was not entitled
to be regarded as exempt.

In Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner, 950 F.2d 365 (7th Cir. 1991), the Court of Appeals upheld a Tax Court
decision, T.C. Memo. 1990-484, that an organization operating restaurants and health food stores in a manner
consistent with the doctrines of the Seventh Day Adventist Church does not qualify under section 501(c)(3) of
the Code. The court found substantial evidence to support a conclusion that the organization's activities
furthered a substantial nonexempt purpose, including:

a. The organization's operations were presumptively commercial;

b. The organization competed directly with other restaurants and food stores;

c. The organization used profit-making pricing formulas common in the retail food business;

d. The organization engaged in a substantial amount of advertising;

e. The organization's hours of operation were competitive with other commercial enterprises; and

f. The organization lacked plans to solicit donations.

Application of Law

Your L, R, and S consist of educating individuals about domestic violence and assisting victims of domestic
violence. L, R, and S all serve charitable and educational purposes and fall under sections 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2)
and 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3) of the Regulations. However, your N, which are your primary activities, consist of
operating restaurants to raise funds and are not charitable or educational. For instance, compensating
individuals, whom you described as volunteers, for the work they perform preparing and serving meals is not
considered a “charitable” activity. Therefore, you are not described in section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the
Regulations because you are not both organized and operated exclusively for charitable, educational, or
religious purposes as specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

You are not described in section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Regulations because more than an insubstantial part
of your activities, specifically the operation of two restaurants, is devoted to non-exempt purposes. Similarly,
the operation of the restaurants is your primary activity and it is unrelated to, and not in furtherance of, your
other charitable and educational activities.

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

You are similar to the organization in Rev. Rul. 69-177 that operated a business to obtain funds for scholarship
purposes to enable individuals to continue their education. You are also operating businesses, your restaurants,
in order to raise funds for your scholarship program. Engaging in a trade or business to obtain funds for the L is
not an exempt activity merely because the profits will be used for this program.

You are also similar to the organization in Rev. Rul. 73-127. Like the organization in Rev. Rul. 73-127, several
of your activities such as educating individuals about domestic violence and assisting victims of domestic
violence are charitable and educational. However, you also have activities, the operation of your restaurants,
that are commercial in nature and do not fulfill a charitable or educational purpose. Your operation of the
restaurants does not fall under section 501(c)(3) of the Code.

You are not similar to the organization ruled in Rev. Rul. 76-94 because the operation of your restaurants is
your main function and your planned educational and charitable programs are secondary to your total activities.

You are similar to the organizations described in the American Institute for Economic Research v. United States
and Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner. You plan to operate two restaurants in competition with other for-
profit restaurants. Your restaurants are viewed as commercial. Your sources of revenues are mainly from
restaurant sales and your expenses are mainly for the restaurant operation. Taken in totality, your restaurants are
a significant non-exempt commercial activity that is not incidental.

As held in Better Business Bureau of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. United States, 326 U.S. 279 (1945), a single
non-exempt purpose, if substantial, will preclude tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Code. The
operation of your restaurants, a substantial part of your activities, is a non-exempt purpose; therefore, you are
not operating exclusively for an exempt purpose as described in Section 501(c)(3) Code.

According to the findings in Nelson v. Commissioner, you have the burden of proving that you satisfy the
requirements of the particular exemption statute. Whether you meet this requirement is a statement of fact. The
facts indicate that your primary activity is the operation of restaurants that are similar to other for-profit
restaurants. Thus, you do not qualify for exemption under Section 501(c)(3) Code.

Applicant's Position

You state your activities are charitable because it is your goal to help the less fortunate. You financially
compensate volunteers for their services to help maintain your charitable status while lessening the population’s
need for government assistance. You also supply resources to those in need. You will develop qualified teams
to teach students and the public about violence prevention. You will also develop age appropriate material for
younger children and provide resources to victims.

Service Response to Applicant's Position

Although several of your activities consist of educating students and the public as well as providing resources to
victims, which are charitable and educational in nature, your main activity consists of operating two restaurants,
which are in competition with other for-profit restaurants in the area. Your restaurants are commercial in nature
and not described under Section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Regulations. Additionally, compensating
individuals, whom you describe as volunteers, for the work they perform in the restaurants is not a charitable
activity.

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

Applicant’s Protest

You state that your community development programs fulfill the requirements of section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2),
section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3) and section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1). You state that your charitable mission is different
than the findings in Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner because your operations are to primarily help the
disadvantaged and educate the public. You cannot compete with commercial restaurants due to the fact that
your hours of operation are based upon volunteer schedules. You must use a type of profit making pricing
formula similar to those in the retail food business to ensure that expenses are covered and disadvantaged
employees have a paycheck. Additionally, your advertising is solely for fundraising purposes to solicit
donations and you solicit for donations at your fundraising locations/resource centers.

Your fundraising locations/resource centers, P and Q, provide the public with opportunities to donate to
charities and provide resources regarding how to recognize the signs of dating abuse and family violence and
who to contact for help. At your N, P, and Q you have monitors that show PowerPoint presentations that solicit
donations and provide electronic resources and foundation information. You also have televisions that display
local, national, and global resources and information about resources for help is located in the public restrooms.
There is also free WIFI and I-Pad use as well as free cell phone charging. Your N, P and Q, also provide the
recipients of L with employment. Disadvantaged “volunteers” are employed at P and Q and your sponsors are
advertised on the back of their uniforms. You submitted a menu for Q which shows a variety of breakfast and
lunch items and lists the hours for Q as Monday-Friday from 7a.m.-8p.m. and Saturday 8a.m.-4p.m.

You added several new activities:

• B: You collect gently used and new clothing and basic necessities at your fundraising locations/resource
centers for those in need at local domestic violence and homeless shelters.

• C: You teach youth the aspects of growing, producing, and maintaining sustainable food systems and
participants can explore career possibilities in various aspects of food preparation. Eligible participants
can also become employees at your fundraising locations/resource centers. The produce grown under
this program is provided to the public for donations for meals at your fundraising locations/resource

centers.

• D: At your fundraising locations/resource centers you provide healthy food produced by local farmers
and C to individuals who want a home-cooked meal in a restaurant type environment.

• F: This program is currently under development and will be a 5 week summer camp program for at risk
children of family violence, sexual abuse, and neglect. It will be funded from donations and from your
fundraising locations/resource centers.

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

Service Response to Applicant’s Protest

Several of your programs such as B, F, L, R, and S are charitable and educational and meet the requirements of
section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(2) and section 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(3) of the Regulations. C has an educational component,
but also benefits P and Q by providing produce that is used for meals. Additionally, there is education provided
at P and Q through the televisions, monitors, and signs, but it is insubstantial compared to the operation of the
restaurants.

You do not meet the requirements of section 1.501(c)(3)-1(c)(1) of the Regulations because you are not
operated exclusively of one or more exempt purposes. You do not primarily engage in activities which
accomplish one or more exempt purposes specified in section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Your main activity, the
operation of your N, P and Q, is commercial in nature and is not in furtherance of an exempt purpose. You are
open daily during daytime hours and the restaurant space can be reserved for meetings on Sundays. Your hours
of operation are competitive with other commercial enterprises and you therefore compete directly with other
restaurants. The menu submitted for Q is a typical menu with a listing of the food you serve with the
corresponding price. Meals range from j dollars with additional charges for side items and additions. Aside
from the listing and pricing of meals, the menu states that you are a fundraising location for the G and that
100% of the net proceeds are donated to L for survivors of family and violence. Operating restaurants to raise
funds is not a charitable activity.

The educational and charitable activities your organization conducts make up an insubstantial part of your
overall activities. Your primary activity is the daily operation of the restaurants. Engaging in a trade or
business to obtain funds for your other educational and charitable activities is not an exempt activity merely
because the profits will be used for those programs. Additionally, compensating individuals, whom you
described as volunteers, for the work they perform preparing and serving meals is not considered a charitable
activity. Your activities are commercial in nature and not described under section 1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the
Regulations.

Applicant’s Second Protest

You state that as of K the only programs that you will be conducting are those mentioned in your protest letter.
All others were vetoed by your governing board. You will H, a fundraising and resource center. You will also
have the L which now consists of allowing children of family violence, sexual assault, and neglect the
opportunity to attend F for free. The children will then be eligible to apply for college grants from you in their
senior year of high school that will be renewable based on grades and continued education. For adults, you will
be offering much needed employment to survivors of family violence. You will not be branching out into the
wedding or entertainment industries for monetary donations because you were unable to acquire the historic
location.

You explain that the first stages of seeking help from family violence are the most dangerous. When you put
take out menus from H into the hands of the public, M’s 24 hour crisis hotline number is printed on them so
when a victim is ready he/she can seek the help needed. You reinvent charity and combine providing on the job
training to the disadvantaged with the desire to help end violence in your community. You offer reasonably
priced meals prepared by survivors of abuse.

You compare yourself to E whose activities include thrift shops and argue that the only difference between you
is donated food being prepared and served by the disadvantaged compared to donated used items refurbished

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

and sold by the disadvantaged in order to fundraise and support each charity. You state, “Both charities
“compete” with non-charitable/commercial businesses. To help raise financial support for both charities, each
have set “hours of operation” and set, individual, itemized donation “pricing” that helps provide a “hand-up” in
the form of financial resources to the disadvantaged earning their living and improving their qualities of life
instead of being forced to beg for a “hand-out” and depend on Government Welfare for their livelihoods.” You
state that you mimic E’s charitable mission of providing employment to the disadvantaged. You indicate that
you both provide the disadvantaged with opportunities for employment and extended education that improves
the quality of life and you both collect new and gently used items. You are educational because you provide
information about family violence and dating abuse to the public. You are different from E because you have
your charitable program B which gives to those in need who do not have the money to replace the necessities
left behind or for food. You are also different because you provide the public with information and technology
and you offer healthy meals prepared by survivors of family violence who desire to better their community by
breaking the cycle of abuse. The money from meals purchased provides support for C, a charitable program for
underserved public schools that promotes extended education and offers dating violence resources to students.
Proceeds are also used to help a lunch ministry for disadvantaged children.

Service Response to Applicant’s Second Protest

You compared yourself to E, a thrift shop. However, you are not like the organization in Rev. Rul. 71-581 that
operates a thrift shop. Unlike the organization in Rev. Rul. 71-581, your activities at P and Q are conducted by
compensated individuals, not volunteers. In fact, approximately Z% of your revenue will go toward salaries and

wages. Additionally, all though you mention donated food in your protest, you previously stated that P and Q
would be “farm to table” public eateries and you would purchase goods from local vendors for the restaurants.
Therefore, unlike the organization in Rev. Rul. 71-581, you are not selling donated items. You are purchasing
items from local vendors for the meals that you sell to the public.

You are also like the organization in Living Faith, Inc. v. Commissioner. Your restaurants P and Q serve a
substantial nonexempt purpose. Although you do use the restaurants to provide some educational and charitable
items to the public, the main activity of the restaurants is providing food to the public for a fee. P and Q are
open daily and are in direct competition with other restaurants. Although you state you will provide a meal for
free if someone cannot afford it, your normal prices, or suggested donations for the food items, are in line with
other retail food businesses. Your sources of revenues are mainly from restaurant sales and your expenses are
mainly for the restaurant operations. Your activities are commercial in nature and not described under section
1.501(c)(3)-1(a)(1) of the Regulations.

Conclusion

Based on the facts and circumstances presented, we conclude that you do not qualify for recognition of
exemption from federal income tax as an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Code. Your
restaurant activities are indistinguishable from similar activities of an ordinary commercial enterprise.
Accordingly, you must file federal tax returns and contributions to you are not deductible under section 170 of
the Code.

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

If you don’t agree
You have a right to file a protest if you don’t agree with our proposed adverse determination. To do so, you
must send a statement to us within 30 days of the date of this letter. The statement must include:

• Your name, address, employer identification number (EIN), and a daytime phone
number

• A copy of this letter highlighting the findings you disagree with
• An explanation of why you disagree, including any supporting documents
• The law or authority, if any, you are relying on

• The signature of an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the
organization, or your authorized representative

• One of the following declarations:

For an officer, director, trustee, or other official who is authorized to sign for the organization:
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I examined this protest statement, including

accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

For authorized representatives:

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I prepared this protest statement, including
accompanying documents, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statement contains all
relevant facts and such facts are true, correct, and complete.

Your representative (attorney, certified public accountant, or other individual enrolled to practice before the
IRS) must file a Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representative, with us if he or she hasn’t
already done so. You can find more information about representation in Publication 947, Practice Before the
IRS and Power of Attorney.

We’ll review your protest statement and decide if you provided a basis for us to reconsider our determination.
If so, we’ll continue to process your case considering the information you provided. If you haven’t provided a
basis for reconsideration, we’ll forward your case to the Office of Appeals and notify you. You can find more
information about the role of the Appeals Office in Publication 892, How to Appeal an IRS Decision on Tax-
Exempt Status.

If you don’t file a protest within 30 days, you can’t seek a declaratory judgment in court at a later date because
the law requires that you use the IRS administrative process first (Section 7428(b)(2) of the Code).

Where to send your protest
Please send your protest statement, Form 2848, if needed, and any supporting documents to the applicable
address:

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

U.S. mail:

Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance
Room 7-008
P.O. Box 2508
Cincinnati, OH 45201

Street address for delivery service:

Internal Revenue Service
EO Determinations Quality Assurance
550 Main Street, Room 7-008
Cincinnati, OH 45202

You can also fax your statement and supporting documents to the fax number listed at the top of this letter. If
you fax your statement, please contact the person listed at the top of this letter to confirm that he or she received
it.

If you agree
If you agree with our proposed adverse determination, you don’t need to do anything. If we don’t hear from
you within 30 days, we’ll issue a final adverse determination letter. That letter will provide information on your
income tax filing requirements.

You can find all forms and publications mentioned in this letter on our website at www.irs.gov/formspubs. If
you have questions, you can contact the person listed at the top of this letter.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey I. Cooper
Director, Exempt Organizations
Rulings and Agreements

Enclosure:
Publication 892

Letter 4036 (Rev. 7-2014)
Catalog Number 47630W

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read what the IRS ruled for one taxpayer in 2017, and it can't be cited as precedent. Ezel checks the current Internal Revenue Code and IRS guidance and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.